I own a Tikka T3 Lite Stainless in .25-06 Remington. It is my first hunting caliber purchase (my dad gave me a 7mm Rem Mag which killed me at the range, so I returned it). I was in a rush (having received my PAL and having the bug to get a real rifle) and picked up a scope for it, a Zeiss 3-9x40mm MC Rapid-Z 600. Rifle ran for $900 and the scope (I think) $600+ and then add HST.
I did lots of research on .25-06 Rem before going for it, knowing I was not comfortable to shoot the 7mm Rem Mag all day. I am happy with the .25-06 Rem for Ontario and even mountain games (it is flat shooting and will take down sheep if the wind allows). I'll be shooting 115 gr with it.
I had some help this past weekend (thanks guyz at Silverdale) and sighted it in. I learnt later I can do better so I'll be going in for another day of sighting it in with some different parameters.
But I could not help wonder if I would have been better off with a Nightforce 2.5-10x42mm NXS compact with a Velocity 600 reticle. I know it is a $1,500+ scope, but I'll have only 2 rifles, so might as well get the best for it.
Is it worth getting rid of the Zeiss and getting the Nightforce? Is there really much difference?
I'll be using this for deer in Ontario but possibly sheep in Alberta in a year or two.
Or is this not an adequate sheep rifle and I should simply pick up a .270 WSM sheep rifle later anyway.
Some say a good sheep scope is fixed 6x magnification, and some say a 4-12x magnification. My dad used to use slugs for sheep in Iran, so he just got really close to the game. I know I can't.
Thoughts?
I did lots of research on .25-06 Rem before going for it, knowing I was not comfortable to shoot the 7mm Rem Mag all day. I am happy with the .25-06 Rem for Ontario and even mountain games (it is flat shooting and will take down sheep if the wind allows). I'll be shooting 115 gr with it.
I had some help this past weekend (thanks guyz at Silverdale) and sighted it in. I learnt later I can do better so I'll be going in for another day of sighting it in with some different parameters.
But I could not help wonder if I would have been better off with a Nightforce 2.5-10x42mm NXS compact with a Velocity 600 reticle. I know it is a $1,500+ scope, but I'll have only 2 rifles, so might as well get the best for it.
Is it worth getting rid of the Zeiss and getting the Nightforce? Is there really much difference?
I'll be using this for deer in Ontario but possibly sheep in Alberta in a year or two.
Or is this not an adequate sheep rifle and I should simply pick up a .270 WSM sheep rifle later anyway.
Some say a good sheep scope is fixed 6x magnification, and some say a 4-12x magnification. My dad used to use slugs for sheep in Iran, so he just got really close to the game. I know I can't.
Thoughts?


















































