"Quiet Crown" on a Howa (review)

Dosing

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
75   0   0
Location
AB
Well if any of you enjoyed watching Richard Franklins videos on precision gunsmith, as I did, you may have been wondering about the "quiet crown" which he illustrates.
DSC_0018.JPG

favoriterifle1.jpg



The idea is not to reduce the sound but direct it more forward and in particular direct the shockwave/concusive force in a more forward direction.
Having developed a flinch years ago from way too much 300 and 338WM, I figured anything that would stop that 'smack' from hitting me in the face was worth a try. So I started on this project.
Firstly I was able to pick up a short (20in) heavy barreled Howa/Hogue model, in 223. This rifle is destined for rechambering eventually, so in the meantime I planned to abuse the hell out of the barrel, which incidentally was .850 at the muzzle.
HOW_HvyBarrelVarminter.jpg

Out of the box the rifle if pretty nice, though the stock was longer than I wanted, and regrettably Hogues cant easily be shortened, and I wasn't willing to buy another stock, so I fabbed up a shorter buttpad. Other than that, I like the stock, but they are not meant for much in the way of precision, they are only pillar bedded, not the more expensive aluminum chassis version.
The trigger is quite nice out of the box, no real pull (maybe 2mm) or over travel, the weight is a little high (I have no scale, but it is said to be 5lbs).

Anyway after getting it to fit, and making sure it worked I tore it down and had Striker 'greenify' the rifle.

I decided to keep this a budget build, and went with Leupy PRW steel bases, then modified them with an extra cut,
DSC00712.jpg


Regrettably the rear Rem 700 bases do not align as one would like on these rifles, with them projecting forward into the feed/ejection port area:
DSC00711.jpg

DSC00714.jpg


The only other issue was the quality of the milling inside the trigger guard, it was a little rough, hidden under the black epoxy coating, but visible under the thinner gunkote
DSC00719.jpg


Anyway the last step I had taken before refinishing was to do the counterboring for the quiet crown. Unfortunately I didnt have access to a small carbide boring bar that Franklin uses, and had to use a regular steel boring bar. To start off with a 1/2inch drill was used to remove the bulk of the material, and then the boring bar was used to cut the counterbore deeper, and after a couple of resharpenings, used to face off the crown to a sharp 90 like Franklin illustrates.
In all the process was well over an hour.
The depth was about 1.5inchs, the theory going that this is removable, and on a 20in even if I cut it off now, the barrel will still be over 18inchs.
DSC00729.jpg

DSC00737.jpg

DSC00739.jpg

the casing is a 308, and that gives an idea of size, Franklin seems to make his even bigger, but I wanted to keep the barrel walls thick-ish incase they were too thin and were thus easily damaged.

howa013.jpg



Well yesterday was range day, and man was it bad. The Howas 1:12 twist may have been part of the reason it generated palm sized groups at 100yds with the heavier match loads, but either way the results were universal, from either a bag or bipod. Frankly I suspect the stock and optics more, a bedding and better scope might solve the precieved problem.

That said I was interested in the muzzle, how and how well it worked.
After plowing about 80rds down range in rapid succession a check of the muzzle showed alot of residue buildup:
DSC00878.jpg

DSC00856.jpg

DSC00855.jpg

DSC00859.jpg

howa015.jpg

howa017.jpg


As for the promised shock decrease, I felt it did happen, at 8ft away there was no perceptable shockwave, at 6ft you could just feel it in your nose. When actually behind the trigger, you noticed none. This is all perception though, with out some serious monitering equipment there to check it. I would think it would cut the shock as well as a Noveske brake/flash suppressor, but without two side by side guns with the same barrel lengths its only a guess. Compared to the M4 there the shockwave was marginal, the M4s clearly evident at 10ft.
Picture020.jpg


All in all, looks cool, but I would say the jury is still out on this one, that said, if your crown is screwed, rather than start clipping inchs off, its always an option. I personally figure it needs to be wider than mine, but it certainly doesnt seem detrimental on Franklins guns.
 
Interesting. Maybe your crown is a little off and it's part of the reason behind the largish groups.
 
Interesting. Maybe your crown is a little off and it's part of the reason behind the largish groups.

I thought that might be a contributor, but on looking at the crown the gas deposits are uniform, 6 nice petals. Before doing any more I will try cleaning the barrel well, and lighter bullets. After that if it persists, probably a try at another crown.
 
a ball reaming wouldn't hurt the crown even if you are getting uniform deposits around it doesn't hurt to soften up the edges a bit and guarantees uniformity.
 
Well an update, and confirmation the quiet crown does indeed work!
Once I got a good look at my muzzle I saw it was not as crisp as I would like, so I had the barrel cut back to 19inchs, and then had the crown recut. Achieving a good cut 1.5inchs down a hole proved trickier than expected, so this time my crown only ended up recessed half an inch, and the difference was astounding! Compared to when there was an extra inch of quiet muzzle the shock wave was definite, highly noticable, and far worse than the last setup. I am sticking with the configuration I have now, 19 inch barrel and all, but in a future application I would seriously consider a 1.5inch recess, if the crown could be better cut.
Oh, and the accuaracy came back as well, with 6 shots landing in about 1.5inchs, which isnt great, even for a carbine, but there are others issues, including the user...
 
I'd bet you could get the same results as the "quiet crown" by machining a normal crown and threading the muzzle for a 1 1/2 inch 'extension' of sorts. The crown would be recessed, but it would certainly be a lot easier to machine .... and clean for that matter.

Just a thought.
 
I'd bet you could get the same results as the "quiet crown" by machining a normal crown and threading the muzzle for a 1 1/2 inch 'extension' of sorts. The crown would be recessed, but it would certainly be a lot easier to machine .... and clean for that matter.

Just a thought.

That would let you easily experiement with different shapes for the extension, too.

Mark
 
I'd bet you could get the same results as the "quiet crown" by machining a normal crown and threading the muzzle for a 1 1/2 inch 'extension' of sorts. The crown would be recessed, but it would certainly be a lot easier to machine .... and clean for that matter.

Just a thought.

True, goop tubes etc have been around along time. That would be an easier way I suppose, I wanted to see how easy it was to do it like Franklin shows, without the right stuff its a little harder than I thought it would be. Anyway, I think your right, a screw on tube would be the way to go.
 
how would the shock wave passing the bullet affect it's travel?? apparently the groups got better with a shorter quite crown :( ... either way the screw on version would able to show the difference in shot to shot accuracy. however something that screws onto the barrel of a gun and makes it quieter may raise the eyebrows of LE. even though you aren't containing it. I love it. I have flinching prob's. I'll try it. Hmmmmm... bull barrel with muzzle brake inside bloop tube?? interesting??? 30" barrel with 10" muzzle braked Bloop would be prolly pretty quiet. :)
 
Last edited:
It is not the shock wave passing the bullet as the bullet is what creates the shock wave.

What happens is the gas is able to move faster than the bullet as it clears the muzzle. This gas can then cause some yaw by pushing the bullet base to the side as it passes the bullet.

Ballistics are broken down into 4 areas
1. Internal (everything from primmer pop till the bullet starts to clear the muzzle.
2. Transitional (starts to clear the muzzle untill the bullet is no longer affected by propellant gasses.
3. External (until it hits the target)
4. Terminal (what it does after it contacts the target)

For this reason some believe that rifles with suppressors/ brakes are more accurate as they are able to strip the gas away from the bullet and reduce its ability to disturb the bullet. This includes research done by G.Bull on the GC45 howitzer.
 
Last edited:
Oh, and the accuaracy came back as well, with 6 shots landing in about 1.5inchs, which isnt great, even for a carbine, but there are others issues, including the user...
Thank you for pointing that out..:D
Better glass would help..and I'd throw that versapod in the trash..
 
I have flinching prob's. I'll try it.

I dont think it can hurt. Striker and I were out today, and just using foam ear plugs I can tell you that the Howa was the easiest one on the ears by far, with minimal concusion. In between heavy gusting wind the Howa managed 100yd .25inch groups. It particularly liked the lighter 45gr bullets I had, and even with the 55s it was 1/2inch stuff. Behind the gun it was very comfortable to shoot noise wise, and for the first time in a very long time I wasnt aware of a flinch, so maybe, just maybe I am making progress.
 
I must admit..redoing the crown really tightened up the group..
As for the concussion being different..I was way to close to my m4gery to hear anything else..:D
Post the pics of your 3 round group..
 
Back
Top Bottom