I have had the NS522 for a couple of years, but never shot it past 25 yards. I had the impression it was a good shooter, but never tried to find out how well it shot, or what ammo was best. Today I shot both rifles off sandbags at 50 yards, indoors. No wind.
The EM322A Scorpio was purchased last week, so this was the first time out. It had less than 10 rounds through it by the time this test started.
For ammo, I took samples of the ammo I had in the bunker:
The old CIL Canuck blew 5 rims out of the first 10 shots, so I did not repeat it in the second rifle.
The Junior ammo is steel case Russian ammo (cheap -65 cents a pack) It did not extract at all, so it was not tested.
I have done this kind of testing many times before, and I knew 2 things for sure before I started the test. I knew that match ammo (expensive) shoots better than bulk ammo (cheap) and I knew that in each rifle some ammo works better than other. I was hoping to find a cheap ammo that shot almost as well as match.
As you can see, there was quite a difference in group sizes in the NS522:
With the Scorpio I saw something new. The group shifted a lot with different ammo. I was shooting at 50 yards, so expected to see a small elevation difference between high velocity and standard velocity - maybe an inch.
Groups 1 to 5 were all shot with the same scope setting:
It appears that the standard velocity ammo shoots to a different place than the high velocity. I have not bedded this rifle, so I am guessing something is flexing. I will try more torque on the action screws.
I included some super high velocity ammo. The CCI Velocitor and the Aguilla Interceptor launch 40 gr bullets at over 1400 fps. I was curious to see if there was any accuracy. (Yes, there is.)
The next step is to measure all the groups, label the targets, and tabulate the results.
Conclusions:
NS522 shoots well and better than Scorpion.
Skorpion shoots well enough to distinguish between fair ammo and match ammo.
SK Match is good stuff.
Aguilla Interceptor delivers power and accuracy. Over 1400 fps (1437)
The cheap ammo that shoots well is the Armscor precision. I bought a 5,000 round case of this for $250 a few years ago. I still have it because it does not work well in pistols.
The NS522 fed all ammo well.
The Scorpio did not feed the Ely or Winchester very well. The blunt bullet nose would hang up on the chamber mouth. I will see if I can champfer the chamber a bit. I used the same 10 shot Scorpio mag in both rifles.
The Scorpio is very, very comfortable to shoot. I think it is ugly, but feels good. (I knew a woman like that...)
I will play with the bedding, and if the groups don't improve, it will get the iron sights and be a favourite plinker.
Note: NS22 had a 24X scope. EM322A had a 12X scope.
The EM322A Scorpio was purchased last week, so this was the first time out. It had less than 10 rounds through it by the time this test started.
For ammo, I took samples of the ammo I had in the bunker:
The old CIL Canuck blew 5 rims out of the first 10 shots, so I did not repeat it in the second rifle.
The Junior ammo is steel case Russian ammo (cheap -65 cents a pack) It did not extract at all, so it was not tested.
I have done this kind of testing many times before, and I knew 2 things for sure before I started the test. I knew that match ammo (expensive) shoots better than bulk ammo (cheap) and I knew that in each rifle some ammo works better than other. I was hoping to find a cheap ammo that shot almost as well as match.
As you can see, there was quite a difference in group sizes in the NS522:
With the Scorpio I saw something new. The group shifted a lot with different ammo. I was shooting at 50 yards, so expected to see a small elevation difference between high velocity and standard velocity - maybe an inch.
Groups 1 to 5 were all shot with the same scope setting:
It appears that the standard velocity ammo shoots to a different place than the high velocity. I have not bedded this rifle, so I am guessing something is flexing. I will try more torque on the action screws.
I included some super high velocity ammo. The CCI Velocitor and the Aguilla Interceptor launch 40 gr bullets at over 1400 fps. I was curious to see if there was any accuracy. (Yes, there is.)
The next step is to measure all the groups, label the targets, and tabulate the results.
Conclusions:
NS522 shoots well and better than Scorpion.
Skorpion shoots well enough to distinguish between fair ammo and match ammo.
SK Match is good stuff.
Aguilla Interceptor delivers power and accuracy. Over 1400 fps (1437)
The cheap ammo that shoots well is the Armscor precision. I bought a 5,000 round case of this for $250 a few years ago. I still have it because it does not work well in pistols.
The NS522 fed all ammo well.
The Scorpio did not feed the Ely or Winchester very well. The blunt bullet nose would hang up on the chamber mouth. I will see if I can champfer the chamber a bit. I used the same 10 shot Scorpio mag in both rifles.
The Scorpio is very, very comfortable to shoot. I think it is ugly, but feels good. (I knew a woman like that...)
I will play with the bedding, and if the groups don't improve, it will get the iron sights and be a favourite plinker.
Note: NS22 had a 24X scope. EM322A had a 12X scope.
Last edited:
