Range Report: 96-year old Winchester Model 1892 38-40

Win 38-55

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
42   0   0
Well, after four months of no serious shooting, I figured it was time to get to the range and try out a new powder. I've been very interested in IMR SR4759 for the reason that it seems to give a pressure curve very close to black powder. Here's a report on the results of my first two loads, which turned out to be a bit conservative.

Rifle: Winchester Model 1892, made in 1913

Caliber: 38 W.C.F., also known as the 38-40

Original Black powder ballistics from 1896 Winchester catalogue: 180 grain pure lead bullet @ 1,268 fps

Load #1: 15 grains of IMR SR4759 under a 180 grain RCBS FN PB bullet sized to .401
Load #2: 17 grains of IMR SR4759 under a 180 grain RCBS FN PB bullet sized to .401

Chrono results of Load #1: 974 fps with an E.S. of 27 fps and an S.D. of 12 fps (5-shot reading)
Chrono results of Load #2: 1,094 fps with an E.S. of 105 fps and an S.D. of 35 fps (10-shot reading)

Here's a photo of my old 96-year old 38-40 ....

38-40-800-pix.jpg


First off, I tapped the rear sight over a tad, since previous trips to the range showed that it was hitting a bit to the left. To see if I'd adjusted properly, I set up a target at 50 yards and I fired off two rounds that had not been neck sized at all. The bullets were loose in the neck and held in by the crimp. I didn't want to use these in my official test, so I used them as sighters. The two bullets were very close to dead center laterally so I set up a target at 100 yards. Interestingly, the two bullets that were loose in the necks gave me exactly 100 fps more velocity than the same 15 grain load did when I sized the neck halfway down to the shoulder.

Load #1 Results at 100 yards:
First off, I was amazed at how slow the velocity was. Ken Waters lists 1,153 fps for the same load. Mine putted along at a sedate 974 fps. The rear notch is a small notch within a larger notch, making the top shoulders of the sighting notch not well defined. As a result, my vertical hold was a bit dicey. After 8 rounds fired into the 100 yard target, I had a horizontal spread of only 1 & 1/2", but a vertical spread of a whopping 4 & 1/4". I'm sure it was the problem of the poorly defined shoulders in the rear sight notch. I will have to do some work on that notch. Anyway, here is a photo of the target .....

38-40-15gr-4759.jpg


Load #2 Results at 100 yards, 5 minutes cooling after first 2 shots:
I tried a lot harder to obtain some sort of consistency with my vertical hold on the rear sight notch. After two shots, I headed down range to take a look. It was encouraging, so I went back and fired off the remaining three rounds for this set. Again, I was surprised at the low velocity I got compared to Ken Waters for the same load. He got 1,339 fps and I only got a measly 1,094 fps. The necks were still sooty, so I'm definitely not getting a very high pressure with this load. I got a decent 5-shot group of 2 & 3/8" (100 yards with open iron sights). Still possibly a bit of vertical spread, but I was pleased. Here's a photo of the target ....

38-40-17gr-4759-slow.jpg


Load #2 Results at 100 yards, 5 fairly quick shots, no cooling:
Finally, I decided to crank out 5 shots in a row with no cooling, but still with reasonably careful aiming. This group was not too bad, 5 shots forming a 2 & 7/8" group at 100 yards, but it was spread a bit more horizontally. I wonder if it was from a warming barrel. Here's a photo of that target .....

38-40-17gr-4759-fast.jpg


Concluding thoughts:
Ken Waters lists the max load for Group two rifles as 19 grains of IMR SR4759. I don't know if his batch of 4759 was different from mine, but I do know that his batch would have been a sight older than mine, just bought this past month. I really want to develop a hunting load of around 1,500 fps. Next loads will be 18 and 19 grains of SR 4759. If I can't get 1,500 fps with the 19 grain load, I may have to go with 2400. I see I still have to tap that dadgummed rear sight over a wee bit more.
 
Win 38-55: your first two shots interest me. I wonder if your bullet isn't marginally too small for the bore. The bullets in the unsized cases were faster so is it possible that you are losing a bit of bullet diameter in the neck sized cases from seating and losing a bit of the seal the unaffected bullets provided on the first 2 shots? I imagine you slugged your bore - what did you learn about it for diameter? The vertical dispersion may be simple sighting error and I know I am prone to spread them more vertically than horizontally using open sights. Just can't see the typical bead that sharply against the aiming point. It can also be the effect of changing muzzle rise as the weight distribution changes as shells are taken out of the magazine for each shot. Nice little rifle.
 
Last edited:
Stocker, I slugged my bore, but can't find the slug and paper right now. As I recall, the groove diameter was around .4005" and I'm sizing my bullets to .401". I did try some unsized .403" bullets late in the fall, but accuracy was pretty poor with the larger diameter. Given how hard it is to actually see where the shoulder of the rear sighting notch angles away, I'm pretty sure that the vertical spread in the first load was due to that. I'm 54 years old and my eyes just don't get as sharp a sight picture as they did when I was a young fellow.
 
Win 38-55; Wait'll you get to near 70. It doesn't get better. I find my open sight groups at 50 and 75 yards tell me more about the load and rifle ability and the 100 yard groups more about my inabailities to see a sharp sight picture. I'd play with the diameter a bit. You might even try seating a bullet in a sized case and then use a kinetic puller to tear it down and re-measure the bullet to see if the seating is affecting it's diameter.

Try .402 and/or a lube change or two and maybe you'll find a sweet combination. I think you'll have some fun with it.
 
I sure do hope I can shoot iron sights all my life. I'm saving enough lead to cast my own bullets until I'm 93, so I want to keep shooting iron sights until then. However, I'm not agin using a tang sight. I've got one of those, but not the screws to install it on my 38-40. I do have a Lyman receiver sight on my 30-30 and it sure does improve the sight picture.
 
Back
Top Bottom