RC ce 41 mauser

fugawi

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
EE Expired
Rating - 100%
31   0   0
With all the mauser talk lately I thought I'd post some pics of my mismatched Russian Capture ce 41 K98k that I bought in the 'Peg back when Cabela's was still S.I.R.

For those who don't know the ce refers to J.P. Sauer and Sohn who is one of Germany's oldest gun makers and was one of the prime manufacturers of prewar K98k rifles. Beginning production in 1934 with a s/147 receiver code, the Sauer code was changed in 1941 to a script ce with the number 41 below it. Waffenamts were e/359 and e/37 (in 1940 there were also e/280 on safeties, bolt sleeves and other parts).

On my RC ce 41 the only matching parts are the front sight (no hood), barrel and receiver. The front and rear bands don't match as neither do the butt plate, the bayonet lug, trigger and floor plate, rear sights or the stock. The bolt is a true mixmaster - nothing matches. However the stock is laminate and has a flat butt plate which is correct for 1940 and I suspect acceptable for 1941 as the cupped butt plate was only introduced in 1941. The bolt is electro penciled to the receiver and the stock is embossed with the matching serial number on the left butt stock by Ivan not Hans.

The metal parts have that black 'paint' that you find on Russian refurbs and the stock is finished in what I think is Russian shellac. In a word its ugly. I would rate this milsurp as 'good condition' only. Even as refurbished.

That said its a 1941 K98k so it conceivably seen lots of action - Barbarossa, Stalingrad, Kursk... who knows? Its a bit of a transitional piece - the aforementioned flat butt plate and no front sight hood.

What made this appeal to me was 1. price - it was cheap compared to what RCs are going for today and 2. available. The bonus came in the Waffenamts - none of them are peened. Note the script ce 41 is faint you can't see it unless you use a loupe or magnifying glass plus it has that black 'paint' on the receiver (hence no photo). I thought the code had been ground off until I looked closer.

Apologies I had no chalk to make the stamps more visible. Plus my camera has no macro feature so the pics aren't very good (I'll fix that with a new camera). I will try to post a few more better photos. All statistics and information except that gleaned from my ce 41 is from The Sauer K98k written by Bob Jensen and edited by Peter Kuck.

qb6IM.jpg

Three mausers. Top to bottom: prewar Polish Wz. 29, post war Czech tgf 50, 1941 ce 41.

U2JtQ.jpg

Swastika and four digit serial number on the barrel. According to Jensen, the known serial number range is 1005 to 613v for an estimated production of 225,000 1941 rifles.

ZsJbm.jpg

Eagle/359, Eagle/37, Eagle/37 Waffenamts - on the receiver right side.

nO3Z7.jpg

Mod. 98 legend on the left siderail of the receiver. Just faintly visible to the left is the matching serial number and a Swastika.

VJIgd.jpg

Mismatched floor plate and trigger guard - different Waffenamts, missing both lock screws. Electro pencil serial number on the trigger guard.

qrIvY.jpg

Bent handle and stock recess in the laminate stock.

gSzTf.jpg

Serial number embossed on butt stock by Ivan. Original serial numbers and Waffen acceptance stamp were underneath the stock. My ce 41 may have them still but its hard to be sure.

78qFd.jpg

Front and rear bands with spring.

N718F.jpg

For comparison, note the difference in the post war front band of my tgf 50 K98k (top) as well as the different front sight.

p4LVJ.jpg


aBWpr.jpg

Two photos of the front sight. The Sauer made K98k did not have the sight hood in 1940. These were introduced in 1941. My ce 41 has grooves for a sight hood so it may be missing its hood.

I will post pictures of the bolt, rear sight and butt plate including Waffenamts later.
 
Last edited:
Nice!
Looks like a decent K98K for sure. All the US forums are so down on the RC but I like them. Lots of history, and real world rifle you can shoot and not hide all the time.
 
Very nice! I love my J.P., one of the most accurate Mausers I own and the first one I started my collection out on.

I have your sister rifle, made less than a year before yours but she also went the same path to the Soviet Union. Strangely, there is no "X" for capture or peened Swasis on mine either. When they refurbed mine, the guy doing it made sure just about every part was "EP" to match as compared to my bcd 1944 where only the bolt body has the EP. Also, interestingly, my J.P. has a lot of plum coloured parts whereas my bcd has none. It seems there wasn't a very clear procedure as to how to refurb these rifles at the time.

So many people look down on the RCs but they are true history, rifles that were "there". Best part is, they are not faked unlike their unfortunate Mitchell's Mauser cousins south of the border. Who knows, you may have a part from a rifle that was at Moscow, Stalingrad, Kursk or even the final days of the Reich in Berlin (my bcd has a stamped floorplate made in 1945 for instance) ? That is just the fun of it.

The other thing you can do is track the WaA numbers and figure out the rough production year of the parts and where they could have come from. I noticed alot of my parts were a mix of Erma Erfurt and J.P. parts for my 1940 ranging in production years from 1938 to 1941 so she has proper period parts for her configuration. My bcd has parts stretching from Imperial Germany up to 1945 so she is my real mix-master of parts.

I added the sight hood, cleaning rod, and sling package back onto my bcd and she looks fantastic. My J.P. does not have the slot to take the hood though but did come with the proper flat butt plate stock.

I am thinking your J.P. *should* have the cupped butt plate but don't worry as the Germans, and later the Soviets, used whatever was on hand. For example, both of my Kar98ks have Imperial German parts from Gewehr 98s or Kar 98s from WW1 on them.

Holding and shooting my J.P. reminds me of that scene from Full Metal Jacket where they are reciting the rifle lullaby :D.

IMG_8778s.jpg


IMG_8782s.jpg
 
Yes more mausers please. ArtyMan. Thanks CanadianAR - true our cousins down south, some tend to look down on the RC, but some don't for the same reasons we don't - they are inexpensive and still available. Any Wehrmacht K98k that matches and isn't peened will be expensive anywhere now.

Nabs, I don't think the lack of a cupped butt plate or even a sight hood is a big thing. I read that those came in 1941 and while my ce is a 1941, it serial number is only 1070 higher than the beginning of the known range. The flat butt plate may have still been in the manufacturing line.

I have done nothing to restore my ce 41 accept clean it. Its only electro penciled on the bolt shroud and trigger guard and embossed on the stock. It has different Waffenamts on the floor plate, bands, bolt (everything is different). No cleaning rod or sling. It even has that black 'paint' on the bolt takedown. I've never fired it, I want to check the headspacing first.

I'll post about my tgf 50 soon.
 
Fantastic guys!! I love the history behind the K98, and the RC is just another part of it all.
Don`t sweat our American cousins and their loss of love for the k98...just wait a few more years until they too begin to dry up. Then they will love them plenty I am sure:)
Thanks for posting, Gentlemen!
 
Yeah< I would think that as the vets die, there will be less and less "closet finds" and such for the US guys.
There is still tons more down there which is frustrating. lol
 
That a lovely collecton Fugawi. Nab's; your RC is very interesting. Hang on it. As Mausers become as common as the California Condor, you will find the RC's shoot up in value!
 
Love the RC's! They are about as legitimate as any milsurp out there. I like to think about the things my 1937 Sauer&Sohn RC K98 must have seen. The stock looks like it was run over by something, it has that horrible black paint and shellac, and I wouldn't have it any other way. It also shoots as well as anything in my collection.
 
Hey fugawi, you know what we both missed ? Shots of the receivers! Now our rifles are both unique in a way, they are from before and after the German production code switch of 1941. I always liked the "ce" as it is stamped very nicely.

Here is my J.P. for a second round. I never could figure out what the "triangle" stamp means as it is the only rifle I have ever seen it on. Anyone else ?

Oh, by the way, the same two inspectors looked over your rifle as did mine. From left to right, WaA 359 is receiver hardness, WaA 37 is parts fitting, and the last WaA 37 is final fit and inspection of assembled rifle.

IMG_2017s.jpg
 
Hey fugawi, you know what we both missed ? Shots of the receivers! Now our rifles are both unique in a way, they are from before and after the German production code switch of 1941. I always liked the "ce" as it is stamped very nicely.

I didn't take a pic of the receiver as at first glance there's nothing visible. I initially thought the ce 41 had been scrubbed but its there, only its faint and has that crappy 'paint' or Russian bluing over it. I only saw it when I used a magnifier.

Wondering if I should try to remove it? Is your 1940 front sight grooved for a hood?

I don't know if its the same inspectors just the same inspection code for Sauer. In 1940 Sauer used e/280 in addition to e/359 and e/37 according to Jensen.
 
Last edited:
No front sight groove on my 1940.

Interesting about WaA 280 as i read it was used by Erma Erfurt.

According to my quick reference list, WaA 280 appeared on J.P rifles from 1942 to 1944.

Up to you if you wish to remove the paint. I did on my J.P. because there was only a little bit left and it was covered over in shellac and a previous owners varnish layer. She looks a lot better now with it gone and I didn't even have to re-finish the wood.

Does your butt stock have WaA markings ? My J.P. does but my bcd does not.

I would still like to see a picture of your receiver in any event, even if it is polished somewhat.

Oh, here is my quick list for WaA numbers:

Wiki Waffenamt Codes.
 
No front sight groove on my 1940.

Interesting about WaA 280 as i read it was used by Erma Erfurt.

According to my quick reference list, WaA 280 appeared on J.P rifles from 1942 to 1944.

Up to you if you wish to remove the paint. I did on my J.P. because there was only a little bit left and it was covered over in shellac and a previous owners varnish layer. She looks a lot better now with it gone and I didn't even have to re-finish the wood.

Does your butt stock have WaA markings ? My J.P. does but my bcd does not.

I would still like to see a picture of your receiver in any event, even if it is polished somewhat.

Oh, here is my quick list for WaA numbers:

Wiki Waffenamt Codes.

Nabs; Thanks for tweeking my excitment over RC's. I might have a line on one. I'll keep you posted. If I get it, I'll call you over for a history lesson and ID session!
 
Anything I can to do to help spread the knowledge and passion for these underrated rifles :D.

Now your going to say she is a 1935 or 1936 dated one, right ? ;)

One of my side goals is to get a 1937 or 1938, right when they were switching from the Weimar style eagles to the WaA numbers. Sometimes you see a mix of both types of marks on the receiver and it is quite interesting to look at. An early '35 or '36 would also be neat too. I did see a 1936 J.P. on the EE a few months back, boy did she sell quickly.
 
Anything I can to do to help spread the knowledge and passion for these underrated rifles :D.

Now your going to say she is a 1935 or 1936 dated one, right ? ;)

One of my side goals is to get a 1937 or 1938, right when they were switching from the Weimar style eagles to the WaA numbers. Sometimes you see a mix of both types of marks on the receiver and it is quite interesting to look at. An early '35 or '36 would also be neat too. I did see a 1936 J.P. on the EE a few months back, boy did she sell quickly.

My friend has 2 and they're collecting dust. Both early 40's. I'm trying to get him to let one go :)
 
No front sight groove on my 1940.

Interesting about WaA 280 as i read it was used by Erma Erfurt.

According to my quick reference list, WaA 280 appeared on J.P rifles from 1942 to 1944.

I'm taking my info from Jensen's article which was written in 1995 and edited by Kuck in 2002. Jensen says this about the 1940 Sauer K98k:

"The production standards used for the 1940 “147” code K98k were the same as those used for 1939. Waffenamts “37” and “359” continued to be used and a few waffenamt “280” proofs can be found on parts such as the safeties, firing pins, and bolt sleeves. Stocks and handguards are exclusively made of laminates and still use flat buttplates."

He then states that in 1942:

"The waffenamt "280" as a final acceptance proof
appeared on the right side of the receiver ring in the “p” serial number range..."

Jensen then goes on to say that Waffenamt numbers remained e/37, e/359, and e/280 in 1943 and 1944.

Maybe someone can check another reference as well. Just a note that the same authors that wrote Kreigsmodell Volume 3 about the late war K98k are also working on Volume 1 about the early K98k.
 
Back
Top Bottom