Real world experience with 6.5/284 and the 120 TSX?

iron cat

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
29   0   0
As the title says , I have two boxes on my bullet drawer so figured to try them this fall out of the son’s single shot but don’t Have any experience with the 120 TSX although I have loaded lots of 140 XLC’s in a 264 and have loaded and killed with the .311/ 150’s
Looking for any suggestions in using them
Cat
 
Closest I have done is 130gr TSX from 260 Rem (2850 fps) and 127gr LRX from 260 (2900 fps). They don't bounce off meat and bones, you'll have no issues with them at any sensible distance

Any powder RL19 burn rate and slower will yield best speeds for the least amount of pressure. RL22, RL23, RL25, RL26, H4831, H1000, IMR 4955, IMR 4831, IMR 7828, IMR 7977, Ramshot Hunter, Ramshot Magnum, Viht N560, N565, Accurate Magpro
 
As the title says , I have two boxes on my bullet drawer so figured to try them this fall out of the son’s single shot but don’t Have any experience with the 120 TSX although I have loaded lots of 140 XLC’s in a 264 and have loaded and killed with the .311/ 150’s
Looking for any suggestions in using them
Cat

While doing my research for which projectile I wanted to try first in my 6.5x55, ballistic studies claimed that a 1:8' twist 6.5 firing 120gr TSX/TTSX creates quite a dramatic effect: https://www.ballisticstudies.com/Knowledgebase/6.5x55.html
Every once in a while, during the course of testing for this knowledge base, a cartridge and bullet combination come together in such a way as to produce unique results. This is certainly the case with the Swede and 120 grain Barnes TSX and especially TTSX bullets. These 120 grain bullets have a long bearing surface, ideal for the fast twist rate of the Swede, producing optimum accuracy. The fast twist rate and fairly high muzzle velocity of the Swede combined with the blender blade style Barnes produce a result that, to be blunt, is best described as vicious.

The 120 grain Barnes bullets (BC .381) will take medium sized game end to end with tail on shots as well as giving fast kills during this process. Wounding at close ranges is fierce and wound channels at ranges of between 250 and 300 yards remain very broad if major bones are encountered. This load is perfectly balanced for use on all game up to the size of Elk, again with attention to shot placement due to limitations of the caliber. Wide wounding tapers off after 300 yards (2200fps) and this is the one caveat with these bullets - they are not fully consistent in action. The Barnes bullets need both velocity and or a measure of body weight resistance in order to produce wide wounding. The use of a light bullet such as the 120 grain weight also helps to enhance energy transfer. But if rear lung shots are taken at ranges of 250 yards and beyond, or if the range is simply too long- all bets are off. At extended ranges, the Barnes bullets simply cannot create wide wounds.
 
Thanks Guys , I was going to use these things in the 6.5 BadCat but the Gamekings and Alberta Wildcats were so crazy accurate that I never tried them
I’ll see if they work in the gain twist barrel on the B78
Cat
 
Tested today with 48 grains of Hybrid 100
And an OAL of 2.880
Load shows potential as far as group size ( 1/2 MOA at 200 yards ) with repeatable three shot groups
300 meter drop is somewhere around 7 or 8” but I can’t say for certain because I just shot steel at that distance, I only had a target set at 200 fir initial testing.
Next trip will be with the chronograph and targets at 1,2, and 300:cool:
Cat
 
Back
Top Bottom