Remington 788, anyone have info on them?

I have 4 of them. 223 with a 1-9 heavy barrel, 6mm, 6mm-284, and a 7mm-08 carbine. Good guns, all accurate. I don't think k they are a 600 dollar gun, but in today's market 500 would be fair. Having said that, I have duplicates of all these so maybe it's time to send them to a new home. - dan
 
I've had 788's in .223, .22-250, 7mm-08 & .44 magnum and loved the way they handled & shot for me. All were bought new, and I never had any issues with them as for accuracy, functioning or reliability. Sure, they were budget built using the screw machinery of the time, but the rifles performed so well in the accuracy dept., that a great many custom gun builders capitalized on the inherent strengths of the 788 platform soon after it's introduction.

There's plenty of good info on the successes of 788 based rifles, both in hunting and competition shooting to show their worth.

That said, as good as the 788 is for general use & custom builds, I would now lean strongly toward a Remington 783 based option nowadays because of it's better adaptability and aftermarket support.:)
 
Last edited:
I had collected and owned every calibre that the 788's were chambered in . They are fantastic rifles. I still have two left (.223 and .308). The .223 I have cannot be outshot by anything else I have tested it against, and there was a lot of test (LOL). Yes built as a budget rifle but has rightfully owned a loyal following.
 
I had collected and owned every calibre that the 788's were chambered in . They are fantastic rifles. I still have two left (.223 and .308). The .223 I have cannot be outshot by anything else I have tested it against, and there was a lot of test (LOL). Yes built as a budget rifle but has rightfully owned a loyal following.

I wore the barrel out of a 223 hunting Coyotes back when I farmed in Saskatchewan.
It became tired after nearly 20 winters so I re-barreled it to 17 Rem and it still did the job but didn't feel the same so I let it go.
And now I'd like to have another 788 in 223 someday ( wishful thinking )..
 
Well I picked this one up to check it out, and damned if there isn't a spot of rust in the bore. It's immaculate inside except for one small speck of rust that once I removed, revealed a tiny section of pitting about 1/8" long, 1/16" wide in the bore.

What a shame. Killed it's resale value, I'll see how it shoots but I guess I got my hopes up for naught.
 
Curious to know more about that scope?
Between the scope, mount and detach mag, you got the
funds covered............me thinks.

You'll make up any differences on the old Winchester.
One can always use a trunk muhnkie.
 
Curious to know more about that scope?
Between the scope, mount and detach mag, you got the
funds covered............me thinks.

You'll make up any differences on the old Winchester.
One can always use a trunk muhnkie.

It's otherwise a nice looking gun. I'll see how it shoots before I make a final decision, I haven't yet paid for it. And it might still shoot fine yet one a couple rounds go down it. I've got the rust spot out and the pitted spot is hardly noticeable. But I can see it, because I know it's there...





Some unfortunate spots on the exterior... :(
 
I've got two 788's. One in 222 which I purchased new in 1980. Very accurate rifle. Won more than a few turkey's at local shoots. The second is a much rarer 30-30 I picked up about 10 yrs ago. If I remember correctly I paid 500 bucks for it. At that time it was the gun to have for postal matches with Cast Bullet Association. Strangely enough I lost interest in the postal matches and have done very little load development with it. There was also a 44 Mag for sale in the little gun shop at the same time.
To me they look unattractive but the 3 or 4 I used to shoot against (all in 222) were very accurate. Most would outshoot the 700 sporters that used to turn up at the same shoots. The old 700's are beautiful rifles in my opinion.
 
mikeystew;
Good morning to you sir, I trust this damp cool morning finds you well.

I was reading your 788 thread with interest to see where it would wander and the responses thus far have actually been quite civilized, tame and fact filled - so a tip of the hat to the respondents for maintaining their decorum.:)

The first 788 I can ever recall handling or even looking at was the one my then new wife picked out of a rack at the gun shop just outside of Moosamin, SK - this was 34 years ago this fall. In those times the shop wasn't open during the day in hunting season, so we went down at night. When she asked how it kicked, the owner of the shop pulled two cartridges out of a box, pointed out the door across an empty field and said "Put a couple of them out there and see".

My how times have changed in the interim.

Anyway hers was/is a .308 carbine and with factory Remington 150gr Cor-Lokt would shoot 3 shots under 3/4" with boring regularity. Eventually I stocked it with a blank I picked up from Don Robinson in Kelowna and it's got a Timney trigger in it now - the original going into a project rifle I'll cover in a bit.

Her rifle;
insurance013.jpg


As well as her's I've bedded and modified two more 788's, both .308's - one more carbine and one standard length, left handed action.
3081_zpsc942debd.jpg


The bolt stop pin was broken on this one, so I put the trigger from her carbine into it and installed a new Timney.

To reiterate what's been said, they are a rear lug action that does flex some, so like a Savage 99 it's wise to stay a grain back from max if you want the brass to last.

The trigger is not adjustable, but if you change out the spring in it, a reasonable pull can be had - we add trigger shoes to ours too though and we think they help with consistency a wee tad.

It's not a bad idea to epoxy the scope bases down on them as there's only one rear screw holding and because they were an economy action the epoxy also takes up any differences in the radii of the base/action. I actually have been gluing down bases for 25 years now and unless someone asks me not to, a rifle coming through my shop gets that as a standard procedure. I should note I do not glue the retaining 6-48 screws in - we're just making sure the fit between the action and base is perfect and of course will stay that way until we heat it up - 375° - to remove it.

When I used to shoot a bit of hunter rifle class in local competitions in Oliver, there was a family that came down from Midway that had a 6mm and a 7-08 in 788 that we all lost a fair bit of money to.

Then too, the now late Forslund brothers would come down from Cherryville and pronounced my wife's rifle - "that ****ing gun. It shoots better than it has any right to Dwayne!" ;)

Personally I believe the small ejection port as well as the relatively small slot for the single column magazine helped make for a stiffer than usual action. That combined with a reasonably quick lock time and good barrels made so many shoot well. Somebody must have cared about barrel quality then too though, you know?

While I'd likely not be inclined to spend a whole ton of money building a bench gun with one, they are an interesting enough platform to play with to see what they and you as a shooter can do. With my wife's little carbine, shooting 130gr HP Speers and 748, if you hit beyond ¼" of your point of aim it was your fault. Even after building a few custom projects - barrels along costing way, way more than we paid for the 788 - it's still a tie for most accurate arm in the safe.

That, as they say, isn't that bad.....

Good luck with your rifle whichever way you decide sir. Hopefully that was useful information for you or someone out there today and all the best to you as we go into the time change weekend.

Dwayne
 
Thanks for the interesting story Dwayne. It is certainly inspiring me that there could still be hope for this rifle. I've seen guns with a small bit of pitting still shoot fine, and the spot on the bore in this one is so short I suspect the bullet will skim right over it. I'm going to take it out tomorrow afternoon and see how tidies and make a decision from there, and my fingers are crossed because otherwise I really like the way the gun feels. It handles really well.
Cheers.
 
Took it out to the range today... Not bad. Not bad at all. I was shooting pretty old hunting ammo that came with the gun and still did alright. The 6x scope was a bit blurry at 100m, but I think with hand loads and a better scope this thing will be a real good shooter.

50m


100m. And I'm 99% sure the errant shot to the left was totally my fault.


 
Last edited:
I do... But hadn't thought to adjust it just yet. But I might check that out looky. It was nice and clear at 50m, but noticeably more difficult to focus at 100. And the parallax on the scope is supposedly set to 150, so I was expecting better clarity down range.
 
You should give me the .223 Dan. Do you still have my 30.06 AI ?

Yes it's still in the vault. The 223 is a project, barrel, receiver, bolt, trigger. Make me an offer. Forgot two other 788's I have; a 22-250 and a 22-243 Middlestead. I also have the plans and instructions for making the triggers adjustable (drill holes, thread, add trigger screws). Had a friend I worked with at the railway years ago who had a few customs built on 788's as well. Not sure what happened to them once he passed on. Had a really nice triple deuce in a black laminate thumb hole stock that was sweet. Good guns all in all. - dan
 
Back
Top Bottom