Restricted AR .22's ???

KMAX

KMAX

Regular
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Are all AR .22's restricted?
I see on Wanstalls web their Colt AR .22 is restricted? Just wondering if this is the case for all AR 22's.

Tks.
 
All AR variants are restricted. Seems simple nuff.
Look at rifles asthetically simpliar....but not variants.
I.E. SR22; mossberg WTF ever that P.O.S. is called.
SR 22 is the way to go ;)
 
xman111 said:
What I was saying is a JR Carbine looks pretty close to an AR, is probably more potent than the 15-22 but is unrestricted.
Click to expand...

:HR:

Stop trying to make sense of it! Save yourself the headache!

These laws are not in place to serve any useful, logical purpose, only to appear that way to the ignorant sheep who make up most of the voting public!
 
xman111 said:
What I was saying is a JR Carbine looks pretty close to an AR, is probably more potent than the 15-22 but is unrestricted.
Click to expand...

the JR carbine visually looks like an AR that fell out of the ugly tree, hit every branch on the way down, BROKE A BRANCH OFF IN THE FALL. Some handicapped person walking buy grabs the broken branch and starts beating the f**k out of it with said branch. Then some mobidly obese dude started s**t kicking it with steel toe UGLAIH (ugly) shoes. And the resulting mess was the JR carbine.

*EDIT* IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED

that I mixed up the Theuron defense carbine with the JR carbine.
JR carbine looks fine.
The above post describes the Theuron Defense.
 
There is the ISSC MK 22 if you want. Non restricted to boot :)

issc_mk22_desert.jpg
 
xman111 said:
Doesn't make sense that the 9mm JR carbine isn't restricted if the 22's are. Welcome to Canada's gun laws :)
Click to expand...
It's a scary black M16 look alike it must be restricted. We're kind of lucky it's only restricted though initially it was going to be like the AK and all clones were going to be prohibited. Even if they didn't fire the same cartridge, look similar, or share any parts in common, it's somehow a "variant".
 
A 22 rimfire ar variant is really in no relation to a centerfire ar 223. An ar 223 uses gas to load and eject a cartridge. A 22 ar uses a simple blow back operation. Two completely different actions and really have no parts in the upper that can be swapped back and forth. So the reason these are restricted doesn't make sense at all. Yes, I know it will never makes sense and the law makers dont really have an understanding about firearms.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom