ruger #1s: which one?

Depends on what you want to use it for. I'd probably say the .375 H&H and the 9.3x74R are a toss-up. The former is better at long range and brass is MUCH easier to find (not to mention cheaper). When was the last time you saw 9.3x74R brass and dies? On the other hand the 9.3 is very cool, and you can rest assured that you won't cross paths with many other hunters who use it. The .405 just doesn't do it for me.
 
Of the cartridges you noted, the .375 H&H is probably the most practical - but since when are Gunnutz practical? The .405 would be my choice right at this moment as the most interesting, but when it comes to Ruger #1's, IMHO they are all worth owning. The 9.3 that turns my crank is the 9.3X62, but I'd want that one in a bolt gun I think.
 
was just checking ballistics of 9.3x74r, hard to believe that huge case cannot be throttled up past the 9.3x62. another thing i wish is that the calibre had been released in the tropical, a little extra weight would have been nice. I understand the .405 can really be hotrodded in the no.1. aside from woodleigh, does anyone else make the 400 grain bullets?
 
I'd go 9.3x74R.

I dunno, it's just a bit different, and doesn't have an ugly, useless belt. But that's just my opinion
 
I've got the .375 and the .405, awaiting the 9.3 in a #1, but do have one in a Farquharson. Having used them all successfully, the 9.3 would be the most versatile and good for anything North American with less recoil. I've taken most big game with a 9.3 double or single shot and it's a favorite cartridge.
If it's just a big bore you want, pick up a .405 and have Ralf Martini rechamber it to 450/400 and you'll have the ultimate for up to pachaderms, and still not bad for recoil. Mine shoots under an inch and even women are comfortable shooting it! ~Arctic~
 
m1978 said:
I understand the .405 can really be hotrodded in the no.1. aside from woodleigh, does anyone else make the 400 grain bullets?
Click to expand...

Hawk Bullets makes a 400 gr 0.411" bullet, and I think Wholesae Sports lists 300, 325, 350, and 400 gr X Bullets by Barnes.

I have the tropical #1 in 405, and it is a great shooter. Haven't perforated anything but paper yet, but it does that quite nicely. Still in the break in phase, but the groups are running in the 1-1.5" area. Fit and finish are good, and the trigger on mine is very nice as is.

Can't remember which forum it was on, but someone was saying that with a case full of Varget, he was getting 2,600 fps with the 300 gr Hornady. I think that may be a little "optimistic" :) but even if a guy was to get 2400 to 2500, you got all the horsepower of a 375 more or less, and a classic cartridge that is a true big bore.

So far, no problems getting components. Factory ammo is a little pricey, though. I think I paid $48 for a box of 20 just to get things goin. The Hornady brass is pretty steep too, but she's a real shooter, and ample for anything on this side of the globe.
 
crazy_davey said:
I thought you didnt like the recoil of a 45-70 according to your other posts, now you are thinking about these :confused:
Click to expand...

the .405 in a no.1 wouldn't be that bad. a 9.3x74r isnt that stout either. only the .375 h&h would be stiff, and i've ruled it out anyhow. the .405 would be slightly worse if you hotrodded it in the no.1 (you would generate tremendous energy though). as for the 45-70, my biggest complaint was for the recoil to energy produced, its not worth it in my opinion, even though i am going to pick up a used h&r locally as a beater rifle (hiking etc), its at a price i can't refuse.
 
Last edited:
for ease of finding components, and ammo, I'd go 375 H&H

lots of power, recoil isnt too bad, even women shoot it ;)

also it has some good reach. maybe try and find a Ruger No1 in 444 :p
​
 
todbartell said:
for ease of finding components, and ammo, I'd go 375 H&H

lots of power, recoil isnt too bad, even women shoot it ;)

also it has some good reach. maybe try and find a Ruger No1 in 444 :p
​
Click to expand...

duh. would prefer a rimmed cart in a single anyhow. still hung up on the 444 thread huh? tod bartell, who is he? a prick. hehe (i'm saying this because i assume you're being a smartass). actually, a 444 would be pretty sweet in a #1, but somewhat redundant with the .405 already in the lineup
 
Last edited:
I think the obvious choice is the 9.3x74R.
Here's a cartridge that was developed for drillings so it could duplicate the ballistics of the 9.3x62 with less pressure and they did this by giving it more powder capacity.
The case isn't inherrently weaker so load the bugger right up!:D
With the #1 you can conceivably load it until you start to see signs of wear on the cases.
As such it'll soon be mimicking the 9.3x64 Brenneke or perhaps even sit on the heels of the 9.3x66 Sako if you use the correct powder and watch for pressure signs.
Remember, the 45-70 can be loaded right up in a #1, almost to 458 Win levels, and it's only 53.47mm long.
Just imagine what that extra 20mm can do for you....... :eek: ;)
It's actually really cool to see people discovering the 9.3mm family.
It's about time they got the credit they're due as 9.3mm is more than "same as 35 cal".:rolleyes:
 
my only gripe against the 9.3 in the ruger is that it is chambered in a 7.25 lb rifle. the .405 at least is 8.5 lbs. if the 9.3 were in an 8.5 lb rifle, i would consider that perfect! lots of history with both carts. the 405 can be turned into an absolute brute with the 400 grain bullets (overpowered for here, but one can always dream of travelling). tough decision!
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom