First let me say that I am not an M&P or S&W basher. I consider myself a bit of an M&P aficionado and have owned a few different ones over the years including a JG Edition M&P9. I currently have a M&P9 Pro (my favorite gun that I have ever owned) and am trying to decide between the Carry & Range kit or the VTAC for my next purchase.
The problem is that S&W is notoriously bad at getting real info out about their different models and various SKUs for each model... That leaves the internet to take up the slack and most of the "facts" and "specs" that we see are really just hearsay, conjecture and speculation; often based on nothing more than it seems to make sense that it should be this way...
For example, when the JG Edition was released (long before the Pro models came out) people were pretty certain that the JG should have a better trigger/sear because, after all, it was Julie G's gun. The reality was the the only thing different about the JG was the sights and the pink backstraps. It was still an awesome gun, but not as good as the guys that never did shoot one think it was/should be...
That brings us to the VTAC. The only things, that I can see from what I have read, that separate the VTAC from a run of the mill M&P are the sights, the FDE frame,and the PVD coated slide.
Nothing that I have read form any remotely official source indicates that there is any difference internally between the VTAC and the rest of the non-Pro M&P line-up... Despite this, there seems to be much speculation (which again has turned into "fact|") about the internals of the VTAC being the same as the Pro, or being factory smoothed, or customized somehow...
Does anyone have a link to any 100% credible or official source that shows definitively that the internals of the VTAC are somehow upgraded from the standard line-up?
Now, I'd like to keep thread to the point and to the facts. If you read on another forum that a guy knows a guy who's cousin gave Kyle Lamb a handjob in the back seat of his Jeep and heard that the VTAC has superior internals, please do not post that garbage here.
I politely ask that you only post what you can back up with official or at the very least credible sources.
If you personally have shot (at the very minimum) at least one of each of the following: regular M&P, M&P Pro, VTAC; and all within a few days of each other; and can indisputably speak to how each trigger felt in direct comparison to the others, then I would consider that to be credible as well.
Also this is not the thread to rag on or brag up the VTAC. There are already a few threads going that have those angles covered. This thread is just the facts.
So... What do we actually know about the VTAC? Anyone?
The problem is that S&W is notoriously bad at getting real info out about their different models and various SKUs for each model... That leaves the internet to take up the slack and most of the "facts" and "specs" that we see are really just hearsay, conjecture and speculation; often based on nothing more than it seems to make sense that it should be this way...
For example, when the JG Edition was released (long before the Pro models came out) people were pretty certain that the JG should have a better trigger/sear because, after all, it was Julie G's gun. The reality was the the only thing different about the JG was the sights and the pink backstraps. It was still an awesome gun, but not as good as the guys that never did shoot one think it was/should be...
That brings us to the VTAC. The only things, that I can see from what I have read, that separate the VTAC from a run of the mill M&P are the sights, the FDE frame,and the PVD coated slide.
Nothing that I have read form any remotely official source indicates that there is any difference internally between the VTAC and the rest of the non-Pro M&P line-up... Despite this, there seems to be much speculation (which again has turned into "fact|") about the internals of the VTAC being the same as the Pro, or being factory smoothed, or customized somehow...
Does anyone have a link to any 100% credible or official source that shows definitively that the internals of the VTAC are somehow upgraded from the standard line-up?
Now, I'd like to keep thread to the point and to the facts. If you read on another forum that a guy knows a guy who's cousin gave Kyle Lamb a handjob in the back seat of his Jeep and heard that the VTAC has superior internals, please do not post that garbage here.
I politely ask that you only post what you can back up with official or at the very least credible sources.
If you personally have shot (at the very minimum) at least one of each of the following: regular M&P, M&P Pro, VTAC; and all within a few days of each other; and can indisputably speak to how each trigger felt in direct comparison to the others, then I would consider that to be credible as well.
Also this is not the thread to rag on or brag up the VTAC. There are already a few threads going that have those angles covered. This thread is just the facts.
So... What do we actually know about the VTAC? Anyone?




















































