I'd take the M70 anyday. Better stock, better safety, hinged floorplate instead of a DM...I think it's more of a sturdy no nonsense hunting rifle than the Sako.
And I prefer the Sako stock, detachable Mag, and honestly the safeties are a wash for me - just goes to show different strokes for different folks. The A7 is just within my budget and is my next pick-up.
I will say that the stock on both the A7 and the M70 feels significantly better than on $300 cheaper rifles like the Savage Weather Warrior and Tikka T3 light. Whether or not that's worth the $300 to you....
is there a better than the factory stock available for the Sako A7 short action?
I also need a stock for a short action Browning Stainless Stalker without the right hand palm swell, anyone know of something available?
The low end sako's are worse than some of the Mossberg rifles for quality of finish and Mossberg's are ugly. I handled a few of them when they first came out and was not impressed. If you really need a sako then save your money and buy new or look for a used 85 or 75. I bought a m70 extreme and it shoots three shots touching if I do my part. I'm happy with true controlled round feed, sako claims that is what they have but its not quite true. The sako 85's are good guns. They just can't compete with the Winchester prices for what you get in a new gun. The a7's are not my choice in a new gun to buy.



























