Same old Brands & Germany Russia Hating

Teapot said:
Actually I like Hk94's and Sako 95's becuase both have a 30 caliber round and both operating systems are simple and reliable. I have found lots of HK94's for sale but am unable to get it into Canada. I am not moaning. It just seems like what I like is not allowed with no reason or an unreasonable reason given. All rifles shoot bullets and all semi-automatic rifles shoot them one at a time. this is not a moan just a statement of fact. I don't like stupidity in laws or rules. A little bit of logic would go a long way.

HK94 is 9mm. UMP is available in 9mm if you want to pay lots and can find one.
 
Well,

I'm happy some of you guys went thru the trouble of importing the CZ/VZ-58... :D

9-7-2006-9_14_52-PM_image001.jpg
 
Ok, Redleg, I may have the nomenclature mixed up, no need to be pedantic as I am sure my meaning was understood. Let's say I like the semi-automatic version of the G-3 rifle (the HK-91) and the Sako 95 semi-automatic version.

Nothing wrong with the VEPR rifles but again they are singled out as bad semi-automatics. But the Hk-91 would be the rifle I would like to buy most.

So I agree that there are more rifles added each year but just not the ones I would like to buy. Nothing anyone need be offended by, I am just saying what I like and what I do not. But there is a bias against these two rifles and anything that is a variant of them. I was simply saying that it is my opinion that because these rifles hailed from a former enemy nation they are banned and that the attitude towards these countries has not changed much in the minds of the older politicians,hence tha prohibited status for only semi-automatics.
 
Hey, Boer seun,

The Kalashnikov was copied by the Finns under licence by Valmet. Valmet and Sako made the Sako95. The Israeli's bought Valmet rifle-making machine tools from Valmet to make the Galil rifle. The South Africans bought the plans for the Galil and made it under licence.

Boer means Afrikaner but what about seun?
 
Teapot said:
Ok, Redleg, I may have the nomenclature mixed up, no need to be pedantic as I am sure my meaning was understood. Let's say I like the semi-automatic version of the G-3 rifle (the HK-91) and the Sako 95 semi-automatic version.

Nothing wrong with the VEPR rifles but again they are singled out as bad semi-automatics. But the Hk-91 would be the rifle I would like to buy most.

So I agree that there are more rifles added each year but just not the ones I would like to buy. Nothing anyone need be offended by, I am just saying what I like and what I do not. But there is a bias against these two rifles and anything that is a variant of them. I was simply saying that it is my opinion that because these rifles hailed from a former enemy nation they are banned and that the attitude towards these countries has not changed much in the minds of the older politicians,hence tha prohibited status for only semi-automatics.

Sorry if it is coming off as pedantic, but your argument is a little hard to follow, maybe because you are trying too hard to make the government's position on these guns rational.
They went through a picture book and labelled anything they saw and disliked as prohibited. Simple as that. They could care less where they came from, who made them, how effective they were or how popular they were. If they looked "evil" they were banned. Guns that have been produced since (as long as they were not advertised as derivatives of "evil guns") are designated based on physical characteristics.
 
I suppose red poppies look evil too. They remind people how these soldiers actually died and what was spilled when the same happened. Now we are supposed to think only about peace when we see a white poppy not about the dead men and their sacrifices.
Same logic as playing the firearm classification game. Those government people must surely be mad, bi-polar and mannic-depressive. We must be simply weak for letting these people get away with what they visit upon us.
 
Back
Top Bottom