hmm, having owned a half dozen or so examples of each (cz 550 and Husqvarna FN98 rifles) and rebarreling FN 98's to 9.3x62 on a couple of occasions I think you fella's need to have your prescriptions checked. Both actions are forged and the barrels are both hammer forged and thats about where the similarities end
no cut in the locking lug cz 550, better recoil lug (2nd in the big booters on the barrel) cz 550. single set trigger that is wonderfully adjustable on the 550 and far nicer wood in most instances than anything Ive owned from husqvarna. Stock bedding has been better with the cz's and workmanship overall at least as good on any of the rifles Ive owned. 19mm dovetail cuts in the reciever (square bridge by the way) for a solid scope mount , bolt dissasembles in 2 seconds etc, you get the idea.
And before the flame attack starts I currently own 9.3x62's in each flavour and if I had to part with one it wouldnt be the CZ.
Everyone of my cz rifles has been wonderfully accurate (sub moa), far more so than any of the 98's (other than one 8x57 with the original tube that shoots like a house on fire) even with the heym and douglass barrel's I put on em. Both have their strong points , the cz is an improved mauser in my opinion So each to their own I suppose, but better trigger, smoother bolt ,better workmanship on an FN 98, I'm not buying it not for a second. How about better engineered , manufactured , more features and metalurgically superior for the 550 ?