I see alot of people that use a savage action for a precision rifle that they have the barrel installed the traditional way without the barrel nut. Is there a reason for this or is it strictly cosmetic? Also other than being "cheap" is there anything wrong with basing a build off the savage action? Is it as safe strong and reliable as the Remington 700?
My first commercial actions were Rems and I built a few rifles. They shot well.
Then I found the Savage/Stevens and this is all I will use for now. It is a great action with some very unique strengths.
There is alot to be gained by using a Savage or Stevens over a box stock Rem. It is not only more ecomonical, but faster and easier to get a rig up and going.
Also, Savage today offers so many great factory rifles that reduce the head ache of running around trying to find parts.
I have used both the barrel nut and the shoulder way of headspacing. There is no difference in potential accuracy. Both will allow you to reach the accuracy inherent in the BARREL.
Now with prechambered/threaded barrels, you can play to your hearts delight and try many chamberings, contours and styles. The installs, using a nut, can be done easily at home thus saving alot on install costs and the time needed to get the work done.
Takes me about 10 mins to change barrels.
I can't think of a better action for those that want to tinker and try various things. And for those who want very accurate shooting guns for min $$$ spent.
Jerry