Thank you. I knew I was missing something. Every board seems to be different. But I got it now.You only put the alphanumeric tag ('F8ipQFO0h6c') in the [youtube] things:
It would make a world of difference in the handling of the rifle. If they don't, I hope a 3rd party does.Again excellent review thanks again. I hope bushmaster comes out with a lighter barrel. I might consider one if they can trim some of its weight.
Nice review.
Although it kind of bugs me when guys do comparisons to ARs and 1911s.
A high hold on a 1911 makes practical sense. Doing it on a rifle may or may not make sense. Every firearm out there is only as ergonomic as the user wants to adapt their style of shooting or operation of it.
Ok then. I'll try to remember that the next time I pick up my Fabarm or 625.It bugs me when people assume everyone uses a different technique for every firearm they own vs. doing things consistently.
Certainly not disputing that, just pointing out the fact your review is based on personal bias surrounding another platform you are familiar with as opposed to an actual design flaw with the rifle. You can certainly get a solid grip on the rifle although you may need to mount it slightly differently from what you are used to.A proper grip, as taught by just about every rifle or handgun course I'm aware of is a deep, solid grip on the rifle or handgun. It gives you better control over it for not just shooting but also thrusting, etc.
It bugs me when people assume everyone uses a different technique for every firearm they own vs. doing things consistently.A proper grip, as taught by just about every rifle or handgun course I'm aware of is a deep, solid grip on the rifle or handgun. It gives you better control over it for not just shooting but also thrusting, etc. I don't think it's unfair to expect the selector lever to remain clear of the operators firing finger regardless of his or her grip style.
I think this may have been mitigated with the selector was located higher.
On the note of ergonomics, I would be very interested to see drills done on both systems. I was originally very excited about the Magpul Masada turn Bushmaster ACR prototype for the simplicity and location of controls.
I think the ARX-160 is going to completely blow away both the SCAR and ACR in terms of ergonomics, ambidextrous capability and accessibility to controls. The charging handle can be swapped without tools in mere seconds, you can change the side where it ejects with the tip of a round and the 3-second barrel change is well - simply unheard of.
That's the one Im holding out for. Plus the accuracy from the promotional videos looks promising. Price tag also looks promising.
And you know what, with what the ARX-160 has to be offer - I'm cool with $3k.
Wow, you're killing me... These attitudes are why our prices our out of control on the cool, potentially non-res guns. "I'll pay whatever, bend me over please" IIRC reps for the ARX-160 said prices will be under $1900 guaranteed. So you are saying that over a 1k gouge is fine, geez I wish I had your money to piss away... The XCR has about a 500 dollar mark-up over American retail, that would be a hell of alot better then over 1k.
Just sayin' these are that attitudes that open the flood gates...