Yesterday I posted an ad for sale in the optics section. The scope I sold ( it sold within minutes ) was a NF NXS 8-32x56 (older style - no ZS ) and I have been accused by a member on here "Bucktomcat" of posting pictures of a scope other than what was advertised - specifically he says that the pics refer to a 22x model with ZS.
I have offered to speak to Bucktomcat and have provided him my personal phone number and I have asked for an apology. He has doubled down on the allegation suggesting my quick removal of the for sale ad is in some way suspicious.
To say this allegation has annoyed me would be an understatement as I strongly believe in posting real pics of what I am really selling. Since I removed my 'for sale ad' (because it sold) I've reposted the pics I uploaded and If other optics folks could opine/verify I'd appreciate it.
These are the pics I posted.
"EDIT: Short version - I was wrong about the scope as, indeed, it had the ZS feature. So, the buyer got a much better deal than expected - being a real gent he said he would send it back for re-listing but I said a deal is a deal and I'm OK with the fact that my mistake was to his benefit. Bucktomcat has not apologized for saying that I put one picture up (of a top-tier scope) while selling a lesser scope. The buyer has said that he will confirm that the scope that he gets is the scope photographed"



Thanks in advance everyone. I know I shouldn't get so upset about this but when my integrity is questioned I just get pretty ticked off.
Bob
I have offered to speak to Bucktomcat and have provided him my personal phone number and I have asked for an apology. He has doubled down on the allegation suggesting my quick removal of the for sale ad is in some way suspicious.
To say this allegation has annoyed me would be an understatement as I strongly believe in posting real pics of what I am really selling. Since I removed my 'for sale ad' (because it sold) I've reposted the pics I uploaded and If other optics folks could opine/verify I'd appreciate it.
These are the pics I posted.
"EDIT: Short version - I was wrong about the scope as, indeed, it had the ZS feature. So, the buyer got a much better deal than expected - being a real gent he said he would send it back for re-listing but I said a deal is a deal and I'm OK with the fact that my mistake was to his benefit. Bucktomcat has not apologized for saying that I put one picture up (of a top-tier scope) while selling a lesser scope. The buyer has said that he will confirm that the scope that he gets is the scope photographed"



Thanks in advance everyone. I know I shouldn't get so upset about this but when my integrity is questioned I just get pretty ticked off.
Bob
Last edited:






















































