Short review of a custom F/TR and custom Tactical build

Tomochan

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
341   0   0
Location
The Cariboo, BC
If you have read any of my other reviews, you will know that I have a weakness for the .308 cartridge and for fine rifles chambered in that calibre. On a money-wasting 1-10 scale with 10 being the worst, addiction to nice .308’s is only marginally better (7) than an addiction to vehicles (8) but we all like toys and so I thought I would show two more of mine. Today the two rifles up for review and comment are a custom F/TR that I have had for a while and another one of those tactical-style builds of which I am especially fond.

Written primarily for the newer shooter, I hope this review will give some ideas (inspiration ?) about what you can build but I should caution that while ‘going custom’ allows you to get exactly what you want/afford, if you decide to sell you will take a greater hit on the resale. In my opinion, the market for used customs isn’t anywhere near as strong as for example used TRG’s AI’s or semi-customs like the PGW Coyote and Timberwolf.

With that cautionary note out of the way, on to the rifles with the first up being my custom F/TR rifle.

IMG_0584.jpg


Put together by Paul Reiben and Mick McPhee out of Kamloops BC this single-shot rifle is built on the RPA Quadlock action (http://www.rangemasterprecisionarms.com).

IMG_0583.jpg


The RPA action is a descendant of the much lauded Swing action designed in the 1970’s and, as suggested by its’ name, the RPA uses a four-lug bolt system and not surprisingly, it is especially popular in the UK and often found on match-winning rifles over that side of the pond. Of the bolt rifles I have owned this is the smoothest operating – even smoother than the exceptional action produced by PGW. Perhaps unusually for a custom action, the price of the RPA includes a RPA trigger which is a two-stage (very similar in feel to the Sako TRG) adjustable and is a very, very nice trigger which breaks clean and crisp. If you like two-stage triggers this one is hard to beat.

For this rifle, I chose to use a Krieger barrel as one was in stock when I ordered the rifle and I have been very happy with the Krieger on my Coyote. In my view, using a Krieger means one less thing to worry about as any accuracy problems are most unlikely to be attributed to the barrel.

IMG_0585.jpg


The stock is an attractive to the eye laminate Reiben which is outfitted with a 6-way adjustable butt, vertical (but not lateral) adjust cheekpiece and a full-length Anschutz-style rail that allows for the installation of most, if not all, bipods. This stock is very comfortable to get behind and for me comfort is a key ingredient in making good shots.

IMG_0581.jpg


When it comes to outfitting this rifle for the range I choose to use a Centershot F-Class bipod

IMG_0579.jpg


I like the ability to make precise adjustments without having to constantly be squeezing the rear bag and the Centershot is really precise. For glass, I choose to use the Nightforce Benchrest 12-42x56 which in my opinion has the best glass of the Nightforce range of scopes and wih 42 mad and 1/8 MOA adjustments is perfect for F/TR. So dressed, the rifle comes in under the F/TR weight limit and is ready to shoot.

So, how does it shoot ? Well, I would love to be able to say it is a ¼ MOA out of the box but given that it isn’t an ‘Internet Only CGN Special built on an old Stevens 200’ ( sorry, couldn’t resist ) I have to say that isn’t the case. In fact, I found this rifle quite picky with ammo but, after much experimentation, I am closing in on a good load and the rifle is now showing a preference for the new 155 SMK and the Berger 155.5 BT’s over a load of 46-47 grains of Varget. Loads in this range produce close to, but not under, ½ MOA. Nevertheless, this is a really nice rifle to shoot and I am confident further load development may well lead to me being able to call this a true, consistent, half minute rifle but as of today I am not quite there.

The second rifle I’d like to share with you is another ATRS Tactical-style build.

IMG_0573.jpg


I have a definite preference for this type of rifle and have owned/still own a number of custom and high-end factory offerings of this type. In fact, avid followers of the crap I write will see that this rifle is almost identical to another ATRS build I had commissioned using a Stiller action which rifle regrettably I had to let go due to unforeseen circumstances arising. When having this rifle built I chose to use a Defiance ‘Rebel’ action. Defiance Machine (www.defiancemachine.com) which is located in Columbia Falls, Montana has a fine reputation for making custom actions on the 700 footprint and this one appears to be no exception. As smooth as my Stiller, the Defiance has the benefit of having a one-piece bolt and handle - unlike the Stiller which had the bolt handle break off on me (it was repaired free of charge and Rick and |Dustin were great to deal with but Jeff Stiller in the USA needs to be reminded of the need for good customer service).

Since comments I have for this rifle will be much of a repeat about those I wrote on the Stiller build, I will just stick to the highlights: For the barrel I stuck with what I had liked on the previous ATRS build - going once again with a 1:10 twist 24” Rock Creek M40 profile barrel as the look I was hoping to achieve was of an updated USMC M40 SWS.
IMG_0574.jpg







Cerakoted black, the rifle and action sits in my favourite stock - the McMillian A5 with integral cheekpiece ( the saddle type are a pet peeve of mine even though there is nothing at all wrong with them and I have them on my Coyote and custom 700 I still feel they look kinda cheap ), and adjustable butt. Rounding out the build I used a Jewel trigger, ATRS bottom metal and AICS mags (which are in my view the best of the aftermarket magazines).

Outfitting this rifle for range work I chose to attach my favorite tactical bipod, the Versapod and also ulilised the Anschutz rail to attach Jerry Teo’s fine MPOD ( yes, it wore two bipods to the range !).

IMG_0577.jpg


As an aside, I would recommend asking whoever builds your custom tactical to install such an Anschutz type rail and they really can be useful. Topping off this rifle I decided to mount my favorite scope for tactical rifles – my Schmidt and Bender PMii 10-50x56.

Pictured with the Coyote for comparison:

IMG_0586.jpg


IMG_0587.jpg

Outfitted with scope and both bipods and ready for the range how does this rifle shoot ? Well, I have had it out once – at the Port Coquitlam and District range – and put 60 rounds through it using a mix of ammo made up for other .308’s. All shooting was done at 200m and it shot everything under 1 MOA with the best group of 5 shots being produced by some 190g SMK over 41.7 Varget which measured measuring a very respectable 1 ¼” that my math makes to be about ½ MOA at that distance. The very best group would have been with the FGMM which put 3 into the same hole but then I got excited and pulled #4 to ruin the group and was still pissed at myself when letting #5 go. These results were not quite as good as what I recorded with my previous ATRS build but that was at a different range under different conditions. Still ½ MOA with all other groups being under 1 MOA on day one with loads made up for other rifles really isn’t too shabby at all and I expect that with proper load development that this rifle will end up as being a consistent ½ to ¾ performer which is most acceptable in my book for a tactical rifle.

In my opinion even though re-sale is not as solid, it is usually worth considering a custom when deciding to buy a new rifle - perhaps this short article will give some ideas.

Thanks for reading.

Bob
 
Last edited:
Very nice builds!

If I may ask- where'd you get those bipods? Interested in one for my DMR project- do they attack to swivel studs, or to picatinny rails?
 
Very nice builds!

If I may ask- where'd you get those bipods? Interested in one for my DMR project- do they attack to swivel studs, or to picatinny rails?

I got the Versapod through Rick at ATRS and the MPOD is a creation of CGN's own Jerry Teo at Mystic Precision. The Versapod attaches through a stud and the MPOD attaches to most Anschutz type rails but I think Jerry can sell you attachments for other anchor points. I reviewed both bipods in some detail a week or so ago on this page.
 
My CG Millennium target rifle is in that exact same stock. How long ago did you buy that stock? Last time I talked to Paul, all he had was 2 tone wood stocks, but that was last summer.
 
Thank you for posting a great write up on two impressive rifles. You don't know how nice it is to read a post that uses capital letters at the beginning of sentences and actual punctuation. However, that should be the subject of a different thread.
 
I got the stock last summer - possibly the last one ? Yes, Ryan, Rainbow - keeping in touch with that alternative lifestyle you lads keep harping on about.

Ted - one has to try doesn't one :)
 
Nice builds

Bob you have two well built rifles and you will be very competive in F-TR the only thing I have noticed is Sure-Shot is no Remple or Star shooter bi-pods there not springy like Sure-Shot.
And I probably get flamed over this but your choice of caliber should have been 223 for FTR.
I shot at the Kingston shoot on weekend. Google Ontario Rifle Association results will be posted today.
Just look at the F open class top two shooters shooting 6 BRs then look at top two shooters in F/TR both shooting 223 fast-twist 30" guns,90gr bullets

La Bill a member on site shot a stunning 249 out of 250 at 300 & 600y on 1/2moa targets on Sat never seen a .308 shoot even remotly close to his scores.
Both 223 where built by Ian Robertson, usinga Star Shooter bi-pod
La Bill rifle is a Defiance Machine action, Roberts Stock,he used my JGS Reamer made for the 90gr bullets

Here is his score for Sat

2+10 at 300=50-8v
2+15 at 300=75-14v bulls, yes 14
2+10 at 600=49-8v
2+15 at 600=75-13v bull

He ended up shooting a score of 489 out 500 for Sat & Sun



P1080743.jpg
 
Last edited:
And I probably get flamed over this but your choice of caliber should have been 223 for FTR.

A man after my own heart. There is little doubt the 223 can do well at the shorter distances. The key is what happens out to 1000yds and beyond.

That is my challenge for this season. Will see what Nokomis has to offer.

Really nice rigs Tomochan. I look forward to sneaking a peak through that S&B someday.

Jerry
 
Gerry
I will be watching the results of westerns and expecially yours, the .308 has nothing over your 223.its better than the .308
Less wind drift,no elevation problems that shooters are having with the 200gr+ bullets.
but most of all no recoil. just pay attention to reloading, good scale .02 at least,measure the ogives and sort if using Bergers.Don,t use a double base powder that can cause problems in heat like RL 15/VT 500 series..
Get it out of your head that the .308 is better, its not!!
There nothing more I would love to see is the 223 win the westerns & the Eastern championships, and all the 308 lovers make 223 rem for there wives & children and see this sport really grow.
To win Gerry you have to make sure of every shot, the gun is rock solid and cross hairs are dead steady like shooting the last shot of a 5 shot group when all you can see down range is one hole.
Read about mirage I shot a 75+8v at 600y yesterday and only looked at flags on sighters and one time during relay, shot 2 v bulls in a boil held off when mirage slowed, It works.
And lastly after shooting 30 shots + sighters clean your barrel, patch out till dry with twill patches, your next sighters will be just fine
manitou
Good Luck
 
You always write interesting, good down to earth and most of all honest reviews.

I do think you might have wrote a little premature though. I bet you get them both easily half MOA (or better) given enough play time.
 
When building a rifle like those 2 beautys, what is the accuracy standard, .2 or .3 would be the norm or it is more .5 .6 ....Thank. JP.
 
Gerry
I will be watching the results of westerns and expecially yours, the .308 has nothing over your 223.its better than the .308
Less wind drift,no elevation problems that shooters are having with the 200gr+ bullets.
but most of all no recoil. just pay attention to reloading, good scale .02 at least,measure the ogives and sort if using Bergers.Don,t use a double base powder that can cause problems in heat like RL 15/VT 500 series..
Get it out of your head that the .308 is better, its not!!
There nothing more I would love to see is the 223 win the westerns & the Eastern championships, and all the 308 lovers make 223 rem for there wives & children and see this sport really grow.
To win Gerry you have to make sure of every shot, the gun is rock solid and cross hairs are dead steady like shooting the last shot of a 5 shot group when all you can see down range is one hole.
Read about mirage I shot a 75+8v at 600y yesterday and only looked at flags on sighters and one time during relay, shot 2 v bulls in a boil held off when mirage slowed, It works.
And lastly after shooting 30 shots + sighters clean your barrel, patch out till dry with twill patches, your next sighters will be just fine
manitou
Good Luck

Off topic but I am the weak link in this puzzle. Oh well, wind reading skills is what F class is all about.

Hope to give a strong showing.

Jerry
 
You always write interesting, good down to earth and most of all honest reviews.

I do think you might have wrote a little premature though. I bet you get them both easily half MOA (or better) given enough play time.

Had the rifle out last night - shot multiple 5 shot groups that were all a hair more than an inch at 200 meters. Used 175g SMK with 44g Varget so I'm happy to say this is a 1/2 moa gun. Will write a more fullsome range report after some load development.
 
Back
Top Bottom