While you are on the site, in your browser find and click "Add to Home Screen" A CGN beaver app icon will then be created to your phone that is directly link to the site.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm considering using a sidemount on custom rifle but I'm testing the waters.
What are people's feelings on them?
Bad, ugly, effective, cool looking?
And post why you think they suck/rock etc.?
Take my negative views with a grain of salt Kombi as my experience is limited. Had an Enfield Sporter with P.H. side mounts that ended up going south. Of course right after I shipped the rifle to a new owner. Aluminum crap! Have a Cooey m75 with side mounts. Hate it. Its just not a strong enough system IMHO. Too much potential leverage on small screws. I'm sure some of the humungous rigs for ARs and such are plenty strong but for a sporter I say bit the bullet and drill some holes for a conventional mount. my $.02
I had one on a Mannlicher-Schoenauer M1908. Those rifles needed them because of the split bridge, but they are bulky and unattractive (to my eyes). Plus you usually have to take wood out of the stock, so it's a one-way street.
They can be useable and sturdy as shown by the No.4T and M14 mounts as well as others however I just can't like them. To see a beautiful old 1886 or 71 Winchester or classic mauser with a side mount is almost criminal in my view. Then again high rise, see through mounts are very week and ugly but many people actually like them too.
As long as you are only putting it on an old Enfield or something, who cares.
I agree that some of the side mounts can be tough and durable, but they also can be finicky, to be polite. The #1 issue I had with them was constantly allignment issues, between the bore and the rifle. It doesn't take much misallignment, and you suddenly 6 inchs off at 100yds (or worse).