significant advantage?

ratherbefishin

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
EE Expired
Rating - 100%
29   0   0
is there any significant advantage to a heavy barrel on a 22 as far as acurracy is concerned?-and for that matter,given the fact that 22 lr velocity decreases in a barrel over 16'' long-what advantage is there to having a barrel much longer than that?[Cutting my 22 brno down from its original 26'' seemed to improve the accuracy,balance, although a bit louder]
 
Last edited:
Generally speaking, assuming all variables are kept the same (chamber, crown, bore diameter, ect), a heavy barrel will shoot more accuratly. This is because of barrel harmonics. Each time you shoot, although you many not realize it, the barrel vibrates. And even very large bull barrels vibrate. But what the bull barrel does, is it has more control over the vibtrations of the barrel, and the vibrations are kept more consistant.

With a skinnier barrel, there are more vibrations and these vibrations can be less consistant, hence, making the gun less accurate.

This is also why barrel tuners are used; to limit and control the ammount of vibrations a gun has.

Cutting a barrel down in lenght isn't going to affect accuracy at all, the only thing it may do is that when you go to recrown it, you may be getting a better crown.

Usually, benchrest guys who use a tuner like the longer barrels, and guys without tuners it doesn't seem to matter.

The only real advantage a barrel over 16" has is its better on the bench (more weight).

Hope this helps,
Jordan
 
ratherbefishin said:
is not a 16'' barrel stiffer and therefore inherintly more accurate?

Check the barrel length on this gun (27.1") This company knows what they're doing. http://www.championshooters.com/1913big.htm

But Volquartsen seems to be using the shorter barrels. Most of their's seem to be somewhere between 16 and 21 inches.

I think a lot of it depends a lot on balance and how you're using the gun, on whether you're bench resting, or it's a target competition.
 
ratherbefishin said:
due to my aging eyes,I need a scope.The shorter barrel seems to balance nicely as a carry gun,too.

I do too. Especially if the gun has ramp sights. Some of my .22's I can't even use anymore because you can't even put a scope on them. I can still do ok with peeps though. Here's a 25 yard 3 shot group with peep sights I did last time I was out shooting (offhand). :)

match 54 offhand group.jpg
 
I can understand the advantage of a longer barrel for open sights,but since the maximum velocity of a 22lr is reached in a 16'' barrel, but if a rifle was scoped-once the balance aspect was addressed-I fail to see the advantage of a longer barrel,apart from looks
 
If you were to draw a 20' straight line along a wall with a marker, and used a ruler for only the first 2', how straight would your line be at the 20' mark?

More barrel = more ruler.
 
I understand the advantges of a longer sight plane for open sights-but once the balance issue is met,on a scope mounted 22,ithe question was,is there any significant advantage to having a barrel longer once maximum velocity has been reached, which I understand is 16'' for a 22 lr[not sure for hyper velocity 22's , 22 magnums, or the .17]
 
One additional reason that they used and still use long barrels 26-28 inch range is for bullet consistence. As you have stated most 22lr ammo reaches max velocity at 16 inch, beyond that the bullet starts to slow down. What longer barrels provide are consistent or more consistent velocities. Standard 22 ammo is designed to be just under the speed of sound and any error will put it in the supersonic range this error causes huge headaches for vertical and horizontal spreads. The longer barrel helps reduce the speed of the bullet so shots are more consistent leaving the barrel.

As to why you’re 16-inch barrel shoots better then it original length. It could be because you cut the barrel at a length that showed the tightest spot in the barrel. Or you found a node (harmonics) that favors your gun in its present state
 
Back
Top Bottom