Is This Right??
I'm not sure if anyone will pay that - consider this a bit of an experiment - if someone does buy my SKS - great.. if not, meh.
Here is how I justify that price:
Original purchase price of SKS-D in 2001:
$300 + Tax @ 7% + Shipping $25 + Transfer Fee $25
= $371
http://www.bankofcanada.ca/en/rates/inflation_calc.html
Adjust for inflation = $421.80
Extra AK magazine: $13.00 + Tax @ 14% + $10 shipping = $24.82
Marstar SKS Scope mount: $40 + Tax @ 14% + $10 shipping = $55.60
$421.80 + $55.60 + $24.82 = $502.22
So, in 2007 dollars, I have put $502.22 in this rifle, which means if I put it up for sale at $500, I'm losing money. So I figured hey, what the hell - some dude just sold a plain jane norinco SKS for $450, and my SKS-D cost $150 more than an SKS brand new, so why not charge an extra $150 over that asking price and see what happens?
So here we are.
The answer to everyone's question? NO, a nearly new SKS-D is not worth $600.... until someone buys it, at which point it will be worth $600 (probably including shipping).
Cheers!
Not to dis your sale but using that logic my 1995 F150 is worth at least $40,000 adjusted dollars.
Not to dis your sale but using that logic my 1995 F150 is worth at least $40,000 adjusted dollars.
Correction: You would have PAID $40,000 in adjusted dollars had you bought it new today. Because you've been using it, putting miles on it, and because Ford has since released a newer, more stylish version of it, the price has depreciated.
Guns don't depreciate like cars do, especially when they are guns that are in relatively high demand that arent being made anymore. For a better car analogy, think of a classic car, for example: a 1957's corvette. The original sticker price of this car would have been about $4000. Adjusted for inflation, that's about 30,503.40 in 2007 dollars, yet yhese things sell for upwards of$100,000 these days. Why? Because someone is willing to pay $100,000 for them these days. That simple.
I disagree, safe dings in the wood, primer corrosion, handling marks, throat erosion and blueing wear does NOT add value to rifle in my opinion. I don't believe it is a God given right to make a profit off every rifle sale.
Theres an SKS-D on the EE for 1000 dollars.(it comes with 4 30/5 rnd mags, a bubba'd ATI Dragunov stock,etc...)
I guess people will pay for a non-restricted that will take AK47 mags.
I think at that price, you're probably better off with a VZ-858.
(Anyone notice Marstar just got them in???)
Personally, I think they are s**tty rifles, I will stick with my regular toploaders as they are much faster and more practical. If I want to shoot something with big mags and only 5 rounds I drag out my CZ858...
With 858s out there, why SKS-D it? Lever has a new D with seven 30/5 mags, webbing, etc. for $590.