I have a Leupold ultimate slam on my savage 212 and I have a Nikon Prostaff slug scope on my 870 w/rifled cantilever barrel. The Leupold glass quality is fantastic and definitely pulls more light at dawn and dusk. Both reticles are quite similar. Both hold zero well and have held up to abuse and the test of time. I paid $400 on here for the Leupold and I paid $125 for the Nikon. The Leupold is superior. But not worth 3x the price IMO. Just remember, it’s a slug gun. You’re not shooting long range. Hope this helps.