Slugfest!

WanstallsOnline said:
Why would they reduce capacity if they are actually shorter than 2-3/4"? We have not found this to be true whatsoever in any gun we have tried them in.

Additionally, the S&B slugs are 1350fps minimum. That is faster than many slugs out and only about 16% off the 1600 maximum listed by everyone else. S&B is conservative in their numbers and as they use European measures for opened shells they also conservatively list their ammo as 2-5/8" instead of 2-3/4" (2-6/8")

They are fantastic shooting slugs. They do not reduce capacity whatsoever. They are shorter than 2-3/4" shells by a miniscule amount.
Click to expand...
These are my favourite slugs and thank you for getting them. And no they do not reduce the capacity of rounds.
 
Brian46 said:
someone can not read a tape measure
Click to expand...

WanstallsOnline said:
Why would they reduce capacity if they are actually shorter than 2-3/4"? We have not found this to be true whatsoever in any gun we have tried them in.

Additionally, the S&B slugs are 1350fps minimum. That is faster than many slugs out and only about 16% off the 1600 maximum listed by everyone else. S&B is conservative in their numbers and as they use European measures for opened shells they also conservatively list their ammo as 2-5/8" instead of 2-3/4" (2-6/8")

They are fantastic shooting slugs. They do not reduce capacity whatsoever. They are shorter than 2-3/4" shells by a miniscule amount.
Click to expand...
When I encountered the problem, I must have visually compared the S&B slug to a Dominion slug, which is listed as 2 3/4 but is shorter than the S&B.
In my picture below, it shows a 2 3/4 Dominion Buckshot, which is taller than both the other two. If you minus the brass, the opened hull still reads as longer as well.


 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom