CanFire said:
I
like the looks of the loading lever.
Didn't you say in another thread that you prefer the all steel look of the London model Grant? If so, I'd have to agree.
Dean:
Yes, I personally prefer the looks of the "all steel" London Navy - and also am partial to that model because it was Canada's first official military handgun. Sounds like you ought to get a decent London Model 1851 to use in original cap & ball configuration, and you can look into getting one of the "drop in" cartridge conversions later on - at least with those you can retain the loading lever in place, since you like that look .... (There are also replacement "cut down" cylinder pins available to use with these conversion cylinders, to permit a switch to the "leverless" look ...)
FWIW, I can provide a bit of further news about what is currently available at Shooter's Choice, in the Cartridge Conversion models. As I mentioned, I was enquiring about availability of an "Open Top" in .45 Colt, and received an e-mail reply from them today, which I'll quote in its entirety:
Yes, the pricing on our website is current. However, the Open
Tops in .45 Colt have been on order for about 2 years now, and we still
have not received any. We get ocassional shipments of .38 Special and
.45 Schofield, but currently only have .38 Specials in stock. Sorry I
cannot be of more help.
Well - so much for my hope of being able to acquire an Open Top in .45 Colt any time soon ...

"Plan B" has been to write back and see if they have any Richards-Mason conversions in .45 Schofield - a cartridge which I can load with my existing dies using reduced-length .45 Colt brass. I have also even asked about my "Plan C" - which would be to consider breaking down and getting something chambered in .38 Special - in that case, my definite preference would be an octagon-barreled Richards-Mason conversion, which would look best as a "companion piece" for my 1851 Navy C&B. (Since I was penning a reply, I also threw in an enquiry about availability of a London Model 1851 Navy - will let you know what they say.)
On the topic of brass versus steel triggerguard and gripstraps - I am reminded of what I did with my "brace" of Model 1875 Remington revolver repros, which are both Uberti-made, but quite a bit different in age. One of them had a blued steel triggerguard, but the triggerguard on the other is brass (gripstraps on both are steel.) Since I prefer the steel look (and since original Remington 1875's had steel triggerguards) I treated the brass guard with "Brass Black" to standardize the appearance of the pair. It actually works fairly well, though it does tend to wear through a bit with continued use. In that case, however, you can just give it another treatment ....
To show you what I mean, here is a picture of my pair of 1875's. There was already some wear on my blackening treatment of the brass triggerguard whenthis photo was taken, but I can't tell which one is which, in the picture ...
So that actually suggests another option you might consider to get the "London Model" look, if it turns out that only the standard brass triggerguard models are readily available. (If I do end up having to go with my "Plan C", I would likely do that with the brass bits on that revolver ...)