It's not "just wind" for the intellectuals out there.
Did a search on Wikipedia and this is what I got...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_refraction
Atmospheric refraction is the deviation of light or other electromagnetic wave from a straight line as it passes through the atmosphere due to the variation in air density as a function of altitude. Atmospheric refraction near the ground produces mirages and can make distant objects appear to
shimmer or ripple, elevated or lowered, stretched or shortened with no mirage involved. The term also applies to the refraction of sound.
Atmospheric refraction causes astronomical objects to appear higher in the sky than they are in reality. It affects not only lightrays but all electromagnetic radiation, although in varying degrees (see dispersion in optics). For example in visible light, blue is more affected than red. This may cause astronomical objects to be spread out into a spectrum in high-resolution images.
Whenever possible, astronomers will schedule their observations around the time of culmination of an object when it is highest in the sky. Likewise sailors will never shoot a star which is not at least 20° or more above the horizon. If observations close to the horizon cannot be avoided, it is possible to equip a telescope with control systems to compensate for the shift caused by the refraction. If the dispersion is a problem too, (in case of broadband high-resolution observations) atmospheric refraction correctors can be employed as well (made from pairs of rotating glass prisms). But as the amount of atmospheric refraction is a function of temperature and pressure as well as humidity (the amount of water vapour is especially important at mid-infrared wavelengths) the amount of effort needed for a successful compensation can be prohibitive.
Atmospheric refraction
becomes more severe when the atmospheric refraction is not homogenous, when there is turbulence in the air for example. This is the cause of twinkling of the stars and deformation of the shape of the sun at sunset and sunrise.
For those of you still reading and probably with an IQ above 100 here's more...
http://mintaka.sdsu.edu/GF/explain/atmos_refr/astr_refr.html
Astronomical Refraction
Terminology
“Astronomical refraction” is the angular displacement of astronomical objects from their true or geometrical position, because of the bending of rays in the Earth's atmosphere. It is contrasted with “terrestrial refraction,” which is the corresponding angular displacement of objects on the Earth and in its atmosphere, such as ships, mountains, clouds, etc.
As the same atmosphere is doing the refracting in both cases, you can think of terrestrial refraction as the part of the astronomical refraction caused by the atmosphere between you and some object; obviously, this is not the whole atmosphere, so terrestrial refraction is always less than astronomical refraction at the same altitude above the horizon. On the other hand, as distant objects are never very far from the horizon, and refraction generally is largest near the horizon, even the terrestrial refraction can be quite large. Astronomers usually have the luxury of observing objects well above the horizon, where even the refraction due to the whole atmosphere is fairly small.
There's more detail about the relation between terrestrial and astronomical refractions on another page.
Amount of refraction
Astronomical refraction
To give some rough numbers: the astronomical refraction is about a minute of arc in the part of the sky midway between zenith and astronomical horizon, but is typically over 30 minutes of arc (half a degree) at the horizon. (This is the basis for the common claim that “when you see the Sun just touching the horizon, it has already set.”) However, in the Novaya Zemlya effect, commonly observed at high latitudes, but occasionally seen even as close to the equator as San Diego, the horizontal refraction can exceed two degrees.
Terrestrial refraction
Of course, the terrestrial refraction is smaller. But even so, it rarely is less than 1/15 of the angular distance of an object from the observer, as seen from the center of the Earth. Bearing in mind the rule that “a minute [of arc on the Earth's surface] is a [nautical] mile,” you can see that terrestrial refraction is usually several seconds of arc for relatively nearby objects, and can easily amount to several minutes of arc for distant mountains.
While terrestrial refraction is often imperceptible to the naked eye, it's huge compared to the errors of measurement in surveying, which are a few seconds of arc, or less. It turns out to be a more serious problem for geodesy than the astronomical refraction is for astronomy — especially because the refraction near the horizon is extremely variable, while astronomical refraction is well behaved at altitudes above 10 or 15 degrees.
This good behavior of the astronomical refraction over most of the sky was proved mathematically by Barnaba Oriani in 1787, so this rule is sometimes called “Oriani's Theorem”. (However, many other people had already noticed that very different atmospheric models gave almost identical results within about 75° of the zenith.)
Variability near the horizon
This variability near the horizon is very surprising to the average astronomer, who has been educated to believe that refraction (in the part of the sky where astronomical measurements are usually made) can be calculated accurately from the local atmospheric temperature and pressure. This is true in the part of the sky where Oriani's Theorem holds, but it breaks down very rapidly on approaching the horizon.
In fact, it can be shown that the refraction near the horizon depends mostly on the local temperature gradient, which is much more important than the local temperature itself. For this reason, all the refraction phenomena near the horizon — mirages, dip, terrestrial refraction, etc., as well as the astronomical refraction — are very sensitive to the temperature gradient; and they all vary a great deal more than does the astronomical refraction well up in the sky.
This sensitivity to temperature gradients, which vary a great deal from day to day, is the reason for the apparent “capriciousness” of green flashes (to use the term introduced by Willard J. Fisher.)
Calculation of the refraction
Given a model atmosphere, we can calculate the refraction at any apparent zenith distance (or altitude, which is the complement of the zenith distance). As the apparent (refracted) altitude happ is just the sum of the true (geometrical) altitude ht and the astronomical refraction R, the calculated table of R(happ) is easily transformed into a table of ht = happ − R. This function ht ( happ ) is often called the “transfer function” for astronomical refraction.
Once the transfer function is tabulated, it can be used to map the true shape of the low Sun (a small circle in the geometric sky) to the apparent shape we actually see, distorted by refraction. This is not quite as straightforward as it appears, because the calculation gives true altitude as a function of apparent. So we really have to do the mapping in reverse, and figure out what part (if any!) of the Sun appears at a given altitude in the sky. Really, it's necessary to do the calculation this way, because ht is a single-valued function of happ; but, in miraging conditions, happ can be a multiple-valued function of ht. That is, the multiple images of mirages mean that the same part of the Sun appears in two or more different places in the sky.
To do the green-flash simulations, it's necessary to repeat this calculation for several different wavelengths, and then combine the distorted images of different colors in a way that resembles what is actually seen in the sky. The details of how the simulations are made are given on a separate page.
