Sorry if this is a repost, but.........
- Thread starter olek_Z_bc
- Start date
FN2000 is a bullpup and not prohib. Billpup does not = prohib.
See how the convoluted and irrational gun laws keep us ignorant and saying " If I am not sure it means Prohib or not allowed." Who needs the CFC and Bill C-68?
Like a good peasants, we keep ourselves down.
See how the convoluted and irrational gun laws keep us ignorant and saying " If I am not sure it means Prohib or not allowed." Who needs the CFC and Bill C-68?
Like a good peasants, we keep ourselves down.
curtton said:
i agree,it doesn't look comfortable or ergonomic for shooting by the picture anyways.i don't understand the fascination with bullpups to start with.
of course being a lefty for shooting makes me biased against them for the most part.
Teapot said:
I already had this conversation with strange day in a thread on CGS (the guy who brought in the FNS2000) , and yes this stock is prohib'. Now If Norinco ever brings in a semi auto version of there bullpup rifle, and it doesn't get labeled an "AK variant", then it will be a different story.
http://world.guns.ru/assault/as28-e.htm
buster said:
like everything else, people are fascinated with smaller and lighter, like the way our cell phone been going (remember the motorola club phone?).... bullpups has been in the works for over 50 years, only in the last couple of decades its been catching on, when nato adopted lighter ammo, the best part of a bullpups is it illiminates the length of the butt, a real advantage in close quarter combats (not that most of us need that) ofcos there are disadvantages, like you mention for lefties , you could end up with a mouth full of casings, haha, fumes up our nostril , heighten sights and not a direct connection from trigger to hammer.
but inspite of those disadvantages, bullpups are here to stay.
Last edited:
