stickhunter
CGN frequent flyer
- Location
- Victoria, B.C.
Hey all,
A while back I picked up a sporterized byf 41 K98k. I wouldn't normally be interested, but the person was local to me and I figured it would make a decent range/hunting rifle. Now that I've had it for a while, I've given it a good look over and noticed that, aside from a few missing parts, it appears to be all-matching. I began looking at what would be required to desporterize it, and I've got this list of parts to source:
- replacement non-laminated stock with inlet for cup buttplate
- cleaning rod
- bayonet lug
- front and rear barrel bands w/ spring
- 2x action screw lock screws
- front sight hood
What I'd end up with is a desporterized full-wood K98k, but aside from a couple of rifles, I'm not a milsurp collector these days, so it wouldn't really fit into my collection, and I'd likely end up moving it along for something else. Since I'm no longer a collector, it comes down to an economics question for me... is it worth the effort/expense to desporterize a K98k, or do you end up with a rifle that is just (or less than!) a sum of its parts?
I also have a philosophical question regarding desporterizing. I'm not interested in passing off a desporterized rifle as original, and to that end, I picked up an (incorrect) laminated stock set as I figured that would be a good tell to anyone, but I've been hesitating with the idea of moving the matching numbers buttplate onto the new stock --- there's something about that that is causing me pause for thought as it might be misleading. What are your thoughts?
If desporterizing is the avenue I take, are there any particular gotchas/little details that I should take into account when finding the missing parts or would I be good to with any generic K98k hardware?
Any input is welcome... and because we all like pictures, I've taken a bunch that I've put in this gallery: https://imgur.com/a/UUPKK9M
... and here are a couple for ease of viewing... I'd suggest the gallery if you want to zoom in on detail...
A while back I picked up a sporterized byf 41 K98k. I wouldn't normally be interested, but the person was local to me and I figured it would make a decent range/hunting rifle. Now that I've had it for a while, I've given it a good look over and noticed that, aside from a few missing parts, it appears to be all-matching. I began looking at what would be required to desporterize it, and I've got this list of parts to source:
- replacement non-laminated stock with inlet for cup buttplate
- cleaning rod
- bayonet lug
- front and rear barrel bands w/ spring
- 2x action screw lock screws
- front sight hood
What I'd end up with is a desporterized full-wood K98k, but aside from a couple of rifles, I'm not a milsurp collector these days, so it wouldn't really fit into my collection, and I'd likely end up moving it along for something else. Since I'm no longer a collector, it comes down to an economics question for me... is it worth the effort/expense to desporterize a K98k, or do you end up with a rifle that is just (or less than!) a sum of its parts?
I also have a philosophical question regarding desporterizing. I'm not interested in passing off a desporterized rifle as original, and to that end, I picked up an (incorrect) laminated stock set as I figured that would be a good tell to anyone, but I've been hesitating with the idea of moving the matching numbers buttplate onto the new stock --- there's something about that that is causing me pause for thought as it might be misleading. What are your thoughts?
If desporterizing is the avenue I take, are there any particular gotchas/little details that I should take into account when finding the missing parts or would I be good to with any generic K98k hardware?
Any input is welcome... and because we all like pictures, I've taken a bunch that I've put in this gallery: https://imgur.com/a/UUPKK9M
... and here are a couple for ease of viewing... I'd suggest the gallery if you want to zoom in on detail...














Last edited: