Sporting Clays Guns: Beretta Versus Blaser/Sigarms

pontcanna

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
EE Expired
Rating - 100%
32   0   0
Location
Victoria, BC
Mid-Grade Sporting Clays Guns: Beretta Versus Blaser/Sigarms
By C. Fergus Covey

There are plenty of guns in the $1,000 to $3,000 range. When most shooters who have become serious about the sport look to upgrade to something fancier, they usually end up searching in the $10,000-and-up range. Why? Because there just aren’t a lot of offerings in the midrange price class.

However, we found two 12-gauge sporting-clays guns in that midrange price zone—the Blaser F3 Competition Sporting, $5,195; and Beretta’s 687 EL Gold Pigeon II Sporting No. J687526, $5,495. Though both were worth the bucks, we favor the Blaser, for reasons we detail below.

We shot several hundred rounds through the guns on several different sporting clays courses offering a variety of difficulty levels. The subtle differences we found in handling and balance are factors that experienced competitive shooters will appreciate (it’s hard to imagine a beginner competitor would start with one of these, so this line-up isn’t aimed at them), especially those looking to get out of the Browning 525-class of guns without dumping $10K or more into a Kreighoff or Perazzi.

For accuracy, we shot the guns standing at 40 yards as measured by a Bushnell rangefinder (as if for patterning) and from the Shooter’s Ridge Steady Rest on Midway USA’s MTM portable shooting bench for point-of-impact tests, using the National Target Company’s shotgun patterning target (both proved accurately regulated). Trigger pulls were measured by an RCBS trigger-pull gauge provided by Midway USA. Here’s what we found:

The F3 is one of the most unadorned guns we’ve seen in this price range. It has a clean, stark beauty we appreciated.

Beretta 687 EL Gold Pigeon II Sporting, J687526, $5,495

http://www.gun-tests.com/newspics/1106GTShotgunsBeretta.pdf

Open the hard case that comes with this gun, and it’s hard not to gasp "oooohhh!" This is one pretty gun, especially if you’re into heavy engraving. That’s what we’d expect for upgrading out of the first-buyer’s price range—good looks, that is. We want to see improved fit and finish, more embellishments, and a better piece of wood. The Beretta 687 EL Gold Pigeon II Sporting has all of that.

The receiver, which is the most eye-catching portion of the gun, has false sideplates engraved in the high profile bas-relief style. On the left appear three flushing pheasants against a backdrop of rolling, rising hills, an oak tree, and grasses, the latter swirled into ambiguity at the front and back end of the scene. The only thing out of place is a small gathering of conifers in the scene’s left corner—well, at least out of place when it comes to any pheasants we’ve ever hunted. On the right side is a trio of quail on the flush in front of what could be either be a short-tailed English pointer or a too-long-tailed German shorthair. Whichever it is, the dog is depicted in an old-fashioned manner, tail down. Again, there are the hills in the backdrop and bits of tree, log, and grass swirling around the quartet (but no pine trees).

The bottom of the receiver, fences, top tang, and toplever joint are engraved in a scroll-type manner, with flowers embedded at screw and pin points, as well as at the toplever head. The model name and number appear at the receiver underside, lightly integrated with the scroll. The trigger guard has a double-leaf pattern surrounding the Beretta trident symbol.

Though we could pick apart the engraving for legitimacy—pine trees with the pheasants, the ambiguous breed of pointing dog—we really had only one true objection, and that was the forescrew attaching the trigger guard tang to the receiver’s underside. It was intended to bear the same flower motif as the other screw points, all of which are well executed. But this one not only has an oversized slot in it, which disrupts the pattern, it has a second small, gold inset screw near the top that interrupts both the pattern and the overall motif—no other gold appears anywhere but the trigger. Worst of all, it’s not aligned with the slot it’s set into, rather criminal compared to the care taken with the others.

The wood on both the buttstock and Schnabel forend are a good match to the heavy engraving on this gun, possessing strong figuring in shades of dark to milk chocolate. The checkering, however, left something to be desired. Though a tight pattern of 24 lines per inch, the relief is so low as to offer almost no more purchase than the rest of the wood. It looks nice, but on hot days will be slick in an ungloved hand. The border is also a bit roughly done and has some runover at the points.

That runover was indicative of the rest of the fit and finish between wood and metal on the gun. We noticed a few places along the butt pad where the wood just wasn’t as flush as it should be—a couple more passes with the sandpaper before the gloss finish was added would have easily solved this. Too, at the underside of the receiver, there’s at least one point on the exposed wood edge of the inletting that’s not stained. And on the metal itself, the toplever has a half-dozen lateral cuts across just its top edge, assumedly to aid thumb purchase, yet because there’s so little of it and it’s not cut deeply, to us it looks cheaply done. Beretta so well executed the opposing hatch marks on the safety/barrel selector, we wondered why they couldn’t be bothered doing the same on the toplever. Finally, the back edge of the butt pad, where it has been ground down to round what might have been an edge (it doesn’t actually look like there was much of one), is unevenly and roughly done.

These are tiny points, but we think these finish discrepancies are an issue for a gun in this price range. In our opinion, potential buyers should examine several samples of this model for fit and finish details at these points (and anywhere else for that matter) before committing their wallets.

Overall, this is a beautiful gun. It also shot as well as we’d hoped.

Equipped with 32-inch barrels, this gun was one of the most controllable we’ve shot in a long time. Even a mismount (which happened frequently during testing, thanks to this gun’s long 14.75-inch length of pull, 0.75 inches longer than our main test shooter was used to handling) didn’t prevent us from realigning everything to make the break. The balance is forward, but the barrels themselves are anything but clubs, making corrections a real possibility, a big bonus in a competitive gun.

Function was flawless. Even the lightest loads we shot, Winchester’s X-tra Lights, never failed to reset the firing pin for the second barrel (ditto for the F3). Likewise, the barrel selector and safety. This gun does not auto-safe, as to be expected with a competitive over/under, and it took positive pushes on the selector/safety to engage either function, which means no accidental bumping.

Elsewhere, the trigger was crisp, with almost no takeup, and creep was nonexistent. We also like that the traditionally styled forend latch stayed open upon prying, with the forend itself easily disengaging and reengaging.

The EL Gold Pigeon II was straight as an arrow on the shoulder on our right-handed test shooter, thanks to a bit of cast-off. Yet the cast-off is subtle enough that we don’t think most lefties will feel canted; the super-sensitive will want to have the stock bent the other way by a qualified stockman, or talk to Beretta about the possibility of have the stock ordered cast-on. The vent rib (the barrels are separated from the forend lug back, but not forward to the muzzle) is fairly low profile, which also helped with the excellent view to the white end bead. The barrels are not ported, but we didn’t feel the gun needed it; muzzle rise wasn’t an issue.

The only other things we wish Beretta had included were extended choke tubes. No one on a sporting-clays course uses flush-mount tubes any more, so at this price, and because of the specifically competitive designation of this gun, a set of extended tubes is the right move.

Other than the cosmetics noted above, the only drawback we could really find was that its weight was too far forward for several averaged-sized test shooters. The weight distribution didn’t affect control to the target, but it did affect how the shooter felt over a long course. Several commented how much effort they were putting into mounting the gun near the end of a 100-round course, feeling the strain across their shoulders, back, and even biceps. Thirty-inch barrels might have countermanded this some, but we still have to conclude that as much as we love this gun’s handling characteristics, this is a big boy’s gun. It needs someone with the build and muscle to keep pushing it around, especially given the circumstances of most sporting clays shoots: hot weather, 100-round-plus main events, plus numerous side-game and warm-up rounds add up to a lot of gun lifting over a day or weekend. This gun is not for the weak of stature.


Blaser/Sigarms F3, $5195

http://www.gun-tests.com/newspics/1106GTShotgunsBlaser.pdf

Compared to the Beretta, the Blaser/Sigarms F3 is less embellished, so if that’s what you’re seeking in a competition upgrade, then you’ll be disappointed. However, this gun is not a plain Jane.

Our sample possesses a very nice piece of wood, well striped laterally, with quite a bit of shimmery tiger striping as you turn the gun to catch the light. Checkering at the wrist and forend isn’t nearly as tight at 17 lines per inch, but it is well done. It’s also done in a very non-traditional way, with the bumps between the lines rounded, rather than left sharp. It provides good purchase for the hand, we thought.

The buttstock possesses a palm swell large enough to be felt without being obtrusive. The Beretta’s proved smaller. There’s just the tiniest bit of cast-off with the F3, so this will be an excellent choice for shooters of either hand; the right-side palm swell shouldn’t disturb a leftie, though they miss it if they had had a left-handed gun before. A truly left-handed gun can be ordered at extra charge.

The forend is Schnable, but it keeps with the angular lines of the gun by possessing no belly and flaring at the end without dramatics. As for the receiver, the flat, gun-metal-gray finish is virtually unadorned. A gold "F3" model designation is inlaid at the lower rear of each side of the receiver, and "Blaser," in darker gray, is inset on the underside. That’s it. If you can call contrasting shades of black and grey, such as those between the receiver and the hinge-pin cover, trigger guard, top tang, and toplever, then you have a wider definition of embellishment than us. Overall, the gun is striking in a distinctly stark, German, sharp-angled way. It doesn’t make you want to touch it like the Beretta does, but it doesn’t lack its own beauty.

Handling is what really earned this gun the "wow" factor. The F3 is nearly surgical in its precision. It absolutely goes where your hands go—no pushing, no shoving, no grasping for control. We even managed to make the break with more than a few bad mismounts (the F3 is a bit long out of the box at 14.6 inches length of pull, similar to the Beretta). The only thing we found a bit weird about this gun, functionally speaking, was its barrel selector. The safety is top-tang mounted like normal, but the barrel selector is in a forward/backward-activated switch located within the trigger guard in front of the trigger. No, no one will hit it accidentally, but it is odd to find it there.

A bit more on the F3’s handling: Not only did it fare well for our test shooters on the clays courses, but one of our shooters took it to Alaska for duck and ptarmigan hunting. Even in a crowded, made-on-the-spot blind on a bay shore, the F3, with its 32-inch tubes and 3-inch chambers, performed marvelously, taking several cackling geese and a limit of brant. Plenty of ptarmigan fell to the gun, too, back on the tundra. That shooter didn’t even really notice much more recoil from the 3-inch BB shells used on the sea fowl, and that says a lot about how an over/under is constructed and balanced.

Part of gun’s excellent handling abilities have to do with the barrel construction. On an F3, the 32-inch barrels weigh the same as the 30-inch barrels, which weigh the same as the 27-inchers and any other barrel length offered. Blaser incorporated that feature so that should a person wish to use the gun, say, for grouse hunting, where they might want to switch to a shorter 27-inch barrel, he or she would feel no difference in the gun’s swing or momentum. We believe that even though our test version weighed in at 8.5 pounds, a full half-pound heavier than the Beretta, the lightened barrels were the reason our test shooters didn’t feel worn out shooting this one. The competition version (there are field configurations, as well) is also equipped with Blaser/Sig’s "Balancer," a threaded, two-piece weight set in the stock that shooters can adjust individually to accommodate their preferred point of balance. Use one, use both, use neither, spread them apart, put them close to the receiver or close to the butt pad, whatever, it’s totally up to the shooter (a stock wrench is included with the gun for easy access without a gunsmith).

Blaser/Sig goes yet another step in buyer adaptation. If you have a pretty good idea what your desired stock dimensions are (LOP, drop at comb, drop at heel, etc.), the company offers two sets of stock dimensions on the F3, out of the box, one of which will undoubtedly be closer to yours. One doesn’t cost more than the other, and even if neither is exact, the closer you can get off the shelf, the less work your stocksmith has to do. You can custom order an F3 to your exacting dimensions (which will cost extra), but to have two sets of stock dimensions available to buyers with no cost difference is revolutionary in terms of consumer accommodation. We think these factors, mated with the gun’s superb handling skills and evenly weighted barrel selection, justify its price tag.

Gun Tests Recommends

Beretta EL Gold Pigeon II Competition Sporting $5,495. Conditional Buy.

If you’ve yearned for a Kreighoff but can’t bring yourself to shell out the bucks, then the EL Gold Pigeon II may be a perfect choice at roughly half the price. It’s certainly no less functional or beautiful, in our opinion. We loved the way this gun shoots and its pretty, pretty looks, despite some nitpicking with the fit and finish and the lack of extended choke tubes. There’s a lot of value here for the money.

Still, we give this gun a Conditional Buy, not because it has forward balance—nearly all sporting-clays guns have forward weight, that’s a necessity in the clays game—but because of how much it has. The particular way the Beretta balances will probably narrow the pool of shooters who want that aspect. Try before you buy, if possible.

***** Blaser/SigArms F3, $5195. Best Buy.

Can a gun that costs so much still be a Best Buy? Compared to guns that cost twice as much, we think so. Clean good looks, outstanding handling, extended choke tubes, integral fiber-optic sights, dual stock configurations to choose from, the Balancer weight distribution system, and an array of equally weighted barrels make the F3 a complete package that’s worth a steep price tag. The only ones who won’t like it are those looking for the fancier look of the Beretta, but they should shoot this one before they decline to open their wallets. After all, this is about putting "Xs" on the score sheet, not whose gun looks best doing it. GT

Written and photographed by C. Fergus Covey, using evaluations from Gun tests team testers.
 
I swear pontcanna sometimes I think you post these reviews just for my amusement because this is the funniest one from these stumble bums yet.

First of all they start by comparing the Blaser and a tarted up 687. With all respect to the 687 it's not in the same league as the Blaser. They might have done better if they'd compared the Beretta 682E which is Beretta's main target gun in the 68 series.

Now for the funny parts.
has false sideplates engraved in the high profile bas-relief style.
No, they are true sideplates. What they might have meant was false sidelocks. Picky point perhaps but then these are the guys who want to convince you they are "experts."

Even the lightest loads we shot, Winchester’s X-tra Lights, never failed to reset the firing pin for the second barrel (ditto for the F3).
Yes, indeed "ditto for the F3." The F3 will fire the second barrel with the very lightest of loads. It will even dry fire both barrels because the F3 has MECHANICAL triggers instead of the inertia triggers on the Beretta. On the Blaser there is no firing pin to reset. :rolleyes:

The only thing we found a bit weird about this gun, functionally speaking, was its barrel selector. The safety is top-tang mounted like normal, but the barrel selector is in a forward/backward-activated switch located within the trigger guard in front of the trigger.
Weird as in never seen one like it? Maybe these clowns should take a look at a Krieghoff. It uses the same style of selector in the same place. Perazzi and Kemen also use a selector inside the trigger guard although it's behind the trigger.

That shooter didn’t even really notice much more recoil from the 3-inch BB shells used on the sea fowl, and that says a lot about how an over/under is constructed and balanced.
It also says a lot about how an 8.5 lb. gun soaks up recoil. It has nothing to do with the construction and balance of an over/under which will, if too light or poorly fitting, kick the living crap out of you like any other gun. These guys at Gun Tests must have forgotten the basic laws of physics. The only Newton these guys would be familiar with is Fig.

If you’ve yearned for a Kreighoff but can’t bring yourself to shell out the bucks, then the EL Gold Pigeon II may be a perfect choice at roughly half the price.
This is just pee-in-your-pants funny and not just because they misspelled Krieghoff. Anyone who would say, "I really wanted a Krieghoff but I think this Beretta is a perfect choice instead," would be instantly regarded as a fool at most clay ranges.

Where I would agree with these guys (even a stopped clock is right twice a day) is that the Blaser is a better choice than the Beretta. What they don't understand is why it's a better choice. With the Blaser what you pay for is on the inside. In many respects the Blaser is one of the most innovative and interesting target o/us to come down the line in some years. This fact was entirely lost on the assorted mouth breathers at Gun Tests.

Anyone interested in reading what serious shotgun nutz think about the Blaser should give these a look.

www.clay-shooting.com/guntests/blaserF3.pdf

http://www.trulockandharris.com/reviews.asp?ID=3
 
Back
Top Bottom