- Location
- The Conservative part of Ontario
I've owned all three over the years.
The CO2 had tons of power for the first ten shots, then pathetic. (22 cal) It was a Crosman handgun, so accuracy can't be compared to the rifles, still I'll rate it as terrible. Gave it away to a local actor, for a western production. Many years ago.
The break action spring powered rifle, I still have. It's a Slavia, it would at one time (1965 or so) shoot through both sides of a steel can. (177). Today, it will shoot through one side of an aluminum can (sometimes). It was also reasonably accurate.
Less so today.
The Pneumatic, was a Crosman pump. It was powerful, if you pumped the crap out of it, even though it was a 22, but not terrifically accurate. It died after about a decade of use. Gave it away, for parts.
The CO2 had tons of power for the first ten shots, then pathetic. (22 cal) It was a Crosman handgun, so accuracy can't be compared to the rifles, still I'll rate it as terrible. Gave it away to a local actor, for a western production. Many years ago.
The break action spring powered rifle, I still have. It's a Slavia, it would at one time (1965 or so) shoot through both sides of a steel can. (177). Today, it will shoot through one side of an aluminum can (sometimes). It was also reasonably accurate.
Less so today.
The Pneumatic, was a Crosman pump. It was powerful, if you pumped the crap out of it, even though it was a 22, but not terrifically accurate. It died after about a decade of use. Gave it away, for parts.
Last edited: