Super Long Range Hunting

X-man said:
I don't pretend to have all the answers, just the ones I've personally discovered on my journey to become what I believe to be an ethical hunter. Sure, that makes what I say a little biased and most definitely subjective, but I'm sure when you step back and consider your own comments, the same can be said of yours.

A healthy debate and a free exchange of ideas, personal views and experiences is critical for us all to grow as individual hunters and to allow us to be able to view an argument from all sides. As my mother was so fond of saying when a disagreement broke out between us boys, "...there's three sides to every argument, his side, your side and somewhere in the middle, the truth!"

You said it brother...:cool:

This place is awesome... gunnutz are the best!:D
 
Foxer said:
Well - in fairness mc you can't really compare the two. A sniper can afford a slightly 'marginal' shot that may wind up wounding the target instead of killing. As hunters, we tend to look for only those shots with a very high likelyhood of an instant kill.

Different situation.

I got to object to this one!!!!
You're not serious, are you?
It is customary to put some smilies after a post like this, otherwise guys like me get all worked up with their fatty fingers on the keyboard. :runaway:
 
Back
Top Bottom