Today I looked at a 1951 SKS that aleady had installed on it a Tapco (not Fab, as I had posted earlier) non-folding stock and a Tapco (not Fab, as I had posted earlier) removable magazine. I like the look of the thing over the OEM stock and the length of pull on the Tapco is far better for me.
First, I must say that the quality of the metal parts and workmanship on the SKS appears to be excellent. In particular, that bayonet system is very impressive and so is the reciver and even the dust cap. The bolt looks massive and rugged. I can see why people are impressed with the SKS.
Anyway, the reason I'm writing is to ascertain the reliability/durability of the Tapco magazine. Those plastic lips sure look flimsy and the clerk said he was not even sure if the stripper clip could be used to load the mag.
So, is that plastic magazine reliable and durable?
Thanks
First, I must say that the quality of the metal parts and workmanship on the SKS appears to be excellent. In particular, that bayonet system is very impressive and so is the reciver and even the dust cap. The bolt looks massive and rugged. I can see why people are impressed with the SKS.
Anyway, the reason I'm writing is to ascertain the reliability/durability of the Tapco magazine. Those plastic lips sure look flimsy and the clerk said he was not even sure if the stripper clip could be used to load the mag.
So, is that plastic magazine reliable and durable?
Thanks
Last edited:


















































