One of the things that I've found important in shooting for accuracy -- in addition to ammo, of course -- is the trigger. I know the Tikka trigger can be easily lightened by a simple spring change. How adjustable is the trigger on the Remington 700? What about the Savage triggers? I had a Savage Mark II rimfire with an Accutrigger, which I lightened but not without difficulty. Am I correct that some Savage triggers can be adjusted down to less than half-a-pound?
Any thoughts on the Savage F/TR in .223?
Keep in mind that despite the rave reviews of some internet posters that the Tikka is a hunting gun, not a target rifle. The Remington 700 action is frequently used to build target rifles and gets a good reputation. HOWEVER, the bare action is typically all that is used. The action will be trued, and the bolt may be replaced, and the recoil lug replaced, and the barrel replaced, and of course the stock replaced. They kind of remind me of the Ruger 10/22's that owners try to modify to shoot accurately. They replace everything but the name on the box that they bought it in. I have a Remington 700 and I like the crispness of the trigger, but it is not real light to pull. You can adjust it, but you face the wrath of all the Remington lawyers if they find out you broke the seal on the screws. The trigger has gotten a reputation for firing on bolt closing and there are lawsuits taking place. The newer Remington 700 triggers need a 600 lb Remington Lawyer to pull them. Short story? Most replace the trigger on a 700 when they are used for target shooting.
As for the Savage AccuTrigger I have a rimfire and was able to tune it down to 12 oz pull, and it has had several thousands of rounds through it now, with it working perfectly. It cost me nothing but a bit of labour to do it.
The centerfire Target AccuTrigger Action guns that we are talking about are much higher quality and sophistication than the rimfire. They will adjust down to 6oz out of the box, and I have done it. There were a few initial issues, but I worked through it. It is a great action and trigger. It is way way better than my Remington 700 trigger. And my 700 trigger is from before the lawyers got their fingers in design.
The Savage F/TR I'm sure is a good gun for the intended purpose. F/TR is a restricted class of target shooting intended to somewhat replicate the military use of rifles.
""TR", standing for "Target Rifle", is a subcategory of F-Class competition, limited to .223- and .308-caliber rifles. At many matches, F-TR competitors are restricted to bipod, ruck or sandbags, though at the Nationals a front rest was allowed."
So a gun made for F/TR has restrictions that you as a non competitive shooter may not want to live with, such as being restricted to a miliary cartridge. The higher level F-Class has less restrictions, and Open Benchrest even less. If your interest is in maximum accuracy rather than playing a specific military based game, I would go for the gun that potentially is going to be most accurate.
So long story, but in the Savage Target Rifle Category without considering any rules restrictions, the straight
Benchrest model or the
F Class model make more sense to me. I like the straight rear stock on the F Class better than the Benchrest which has a slight taper. But they are pretty much the same gun. When you shoot a heavy gun like this on a benchrest, you typically let the gun free recoil on the rests, and you want it to go straight back. The trigger is not really pulled but pinched between the trigger and the back of the trigger guard. Or at least that is how I do it.
The issue I have with the F/TR is that it is set up to be shot off a bipod rather than a rest. At my age, I have absolutely zero interest in laying on my belly and shooting off a bipod, especially in the winter! Your interests may vary. I only shoot for accuracy, fun, and comfort. I really like the 6BR cartridge because it has good range, and minimal recoil, which makes it fun to shoot.