I've noticed recently there's a trend towards these triggers. They seem counter-intuitive to me. Doesn't the finger slide down the trigger on the pull? Shouldn't there be as much surface area contact on the trigger as possible? And wouldn't the lack of contact affect sensing trigger break. It just sounds like something for ease of use rather than something to improve shooting. I haven't read any articles on this or anything so please educate me. I hope it's not just some more yuppie anti-establishment pimp out BS.
The Flat Trigger: Where'd that come from?
- Thread starter B.H.B
- Start date
It's an ingenious solution to a non-existent problem. People have been executing proper trigger control on curved surface triggers for decades.
But having said that - it strikes me that a flat trigger may allow for a straight push back on a highly sensitive trigger, as on a precision air rifle or target rifle.
But having said that - it strikes me that a flat trigger may allow for a straight push back on a highly sensitive trigger, as on a precision air rifle or target rifle.
I personally find that the flat trigger feels much better for my big hands - the slightly further forward position seems more natural somehow
I also like the look of the flat trigger better but its the practical aspect that I like most
I also like the look of the flat trigger better but its the practical aspect that I like most
CreamySmooth
CGN frequent flyer
It's preference. I prefer the flat triggers that are wider and flatter for my AR. Don't know why, just find it easier to pull faster. Pure preference for me.
