The inventor of the PIAT

RangeRover

Regular
GunNutz
Rating - 100%
244   0   0
Location
Alberta
While hunting for a different book, I came across "The Adventures & Inventions of Stewart Blacker". The book has been around since 2006, but I hadn't heard of it. The book is Stewart Blacker's memoirs, put together and edited by his grandson.

Interesting read in the Boy's Own style, as the monocled soldier, aviator, and inventor makes his way from Sandhurst to the Army of the Hind, to Flanders and then on to Everest and Military Intelligence Research in the Second World War.

On the way he worked on synchronization of aerial guns, and invented and improved spigot weapons including the Bombard, the HedgeHog, the Petard and the PIAT.

The book is worth a read and can be found fairly cheaply on the used book web sites - in case you need one more book to get you through the last vestiges of this really long winter.
 
IIRC the PIAT is also covered in Robert Stewart Macrae's 'Churchills Toyshop'. Though I am not 100% certain. I remember one of the books on MI9 covered the creation of the PIAT briefly.
 
Blacker talks about Cain as well as two others who won the VC in action with the PIAT - and is highly vitriolic about the initial reluctance to accept the weapon which meant it was not available in 1940 when it could have been put in use against the initial German attacks in the war.
 
Last edited:
FWIW, post-WWII (1950) the UK dropped the PIAT in favour of the American Bazooka.

100 meter accuracy and fuze reliability were issues with the PIAT.

Each system has it's pluses and minuses. One of the handier features of the PIAT is that it was "safe"
to fire from inside a room. It also had minimal firing signature, which is handy when your opponent can shoot back.
No so for any of the full rocket-propelled anti-armour systems.

Lot of great reading on the PIAT here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PIAT
 
How did the PIAT rate compared to a Bazooka or Panzerschreck?

the piat didnt have nearly as big of a firing signature as the other 2, since it didnt have a rocket motor, but it was brutal to #### the first time and even worse to fire

the piat and bazooka were pretty equal in terms of penetration though
 
From the wiki link:

A contemporary (1944–45) Canadian Army survey questioned 161 army officers, who had recently left combat, about the effectiveness of 31 different infantry weapons, in that survey the PIAT was ranked the number one most “outstandlingly effective” weapon, followed by the Bren gun in second place.[28]

An analysis by British staff officers of the initial period of the Normandy campaign found that 7% of all German tanks destroyed by British forces were knocked out by PIATs, compared to 6% by rockets fired by aircraft. However, they also found that once German tanks had been fitted with armoured skirts that detonated hollow-charge ammunition before it could penetrate the tank's armour, the weapon became much less effective.[7]
PIAT in 1948 museum (Beyt Gidi), Tel Aviv, Israel

The PIAT was used in all theatres in which British and Commonwealth troops served, and remained in service until the early 1950s, when it was replaced by the American bazooka.[15] The Australian Army briefly used PIATs at the start of the Korean War alongside 2.36-inch (60 mm) bazookas, but quickly replaced both weapons with 3.5-inch (89 mm) M20 "Super Bazookas".[29] As part of the Lend Lease agreement, between October 1941 and March 1946 the Soviet Union was supplied with 1,000 PIATs and 100,000 rounds of ammunition.[30] The PIAT was also utilized by resistance groups in Occupied Europe. During the Warsaw Uprising, it was one of many weapons that Polish Underground resistance fighters used against German forces.[31] And in occupied France, the French resistance used the PIAT in the absence of mortars or artillery.[32] After the end of the Second World War, the Israeli Haganah used PIATs against Arab armour during the 1948 Israeli War of Independence.[33]
A soldier of the Duke of Cornwall's Light Infantry carrying a PIAT, November 1944

Six Victoria Crosses were awarded to members of the British and Commonwealth armed forces for actions using the PIAT:[34]

On 16 May 1944, during the Italian Campaign, Fusilier Frank Jefferson used a PIAT to destroy a Panzer IV tank and repel a German counterattack launched against his unit as they assaulted a section of the Gustav Line.[35]
On 6 June 1944, Company Sergeant Major Stanley Hollis, in one of several actions that day, used a PIAT in an attack against a German field gun.[36]
On 12 June 1944 Rifleman Ganju Lama used a PIAT to knock out several Japanese tanks that were preventing his unit from advancing in an area of Burma.[37]
Between 19–25 September 1944, during the Battle of Arnhem, Major Robert Henry Cain used a PIAT to disable a Tiger tank that was advancing on his company position, and force another three German Panzer IV tanks to retreat during a later assault.[38]
On the night of 21/22 October 1944, Private Ernest Alvia ("Smokey") Smith used a PIAT to destroy a German Mark V Panther tank, one of three Panthers and two self-propelled guns attacking his small group. The SPs were also knocked out. He then used a Thompson submachine gun to kill or repel about 30 enemy soldiers. His actions secured the bridgehead on the Savio River in Italy.[39]
On 9 December 1944, Captain John Henry Cound Brunt utilised a PIAT, amongst other weapons, to help repel an attack by the German 90th Panzergrenadier Division.[40]
 
Have a PIAT with dummy round. I agree the thing is a bugger to ####. (200 lb spring) Only did it once. THEN I read the handbook. You must NOT dry fire the PIAT or you can damage it! The spring must be eased down. Uncocking the bloody thing was worse than cocking it!
 
Have a PIAT with dummy round. I agree the thing is a bugger to ####. (200 lb spring) Only did it once. THEN I read the handbook. You must NOT dry fire the PIAT or you can damage it! The spring must be eased down. Uncocking the bloody thing was worse than cocking it!

now imagine it recocking itself while against your shoulder post haste upon firing it

you can shoot a can full of lead out of it to decock it iirc
 
Have a PIAT with dummy round. I agree the thing is a bugger to ####. (200 lb spring) Only did it once. THEN I read the handbook. You must NOT dry fire the PIAT or you can damage it! The spring must be eased down. Uncocking the bloody thing was worse than cocking it!

200lb! Jeez.
 
Have a PIAT with dummy round. I agree the thing is a bugger to ####. (200 lb spring) Only did it once. THEN I read the handbook. You must NOT dry fire the PIAT or you can damage it! The spring must be eased down. Uncocking the bloody thing was worse than cocking it!

I'd still like to have one. There is a certain cool factor to the PIAT that you don't see in any of the other anti tank pieces. Anybody have one they want to sell?
 
Back
Top Bottom