Think Our Black Rifle Laws Suck? The Full-Auto Dream

blaxsun

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
769   0   0
Every week we seem to see various comments or threads for full auto or suppressors, leading to the obvious comparison between Canada and our closest neighbour, the US. Most of these are really "wishful thinking" and not necessarily based in reality.

Until lapsing in 2004, the prior 1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban prohibited the following. Some of this should look familiar...

• All fully-automatic firearms
AR-15's by name, and semi-automatics that accepted detachable magazines and two or more of the following: folding/telescoping stock, pistol grip, bayonet mount, threaded barrel/flash suppressor and grenade launchers
• Semi-automatic pistols with detachable magazines and two or more of the following: magazines that attach outside the pistol grip, threaded barrel or suppressor, barrel shroud, weight of 50oz+ or semi-auto versions of full auto pistols
• Semi-automatic shotguns with two or more of the following: detachable magazines, folding/telescoping stock, pistol grip or fixed capacity of more than 5 rounds
• Magazines with a capacity in excess of 10 rounds
• Provisions in the AWB were made for the possession or sale of pre-existing firearms and devices (aka: "grandfathering").

Here are some interesting current facts:

• Silencers are prohibited in 12/50 states, plus DC
• Full auto is prohibited in 10/50 states, plus DC
• Short barrel rifles are prohibited in 9/50 states, plus DC
• Short barrel shotguns are prohibited in 12/50 states, plus DC
• Magazine capacity is restricted in 8/50 states (usually 10-12 rounds)

Let's start with SBRs. In Canada, you can own any SBR (<18.5" barrel or <26" overall length) with a restricted PAL. There are no firearms registration fees at this time and transport is regulated with ATTs. Let's compare the US:

• An SBR is classified as any shoulder-fired firearm with a barrel length of <16" or an OAL of <26" (now you know where that goofy chin stock comes into play)
• SBRs require a $200 BTAF tax stamp (this involves an application, lengthy background check, consent from local LE and registration).
• SBR firearms can only be transferred through a Class-III firearms dealer (no direct sale between buyer and seller)
• BTAFE notification is required prior to taking across state lines (ATT)
• SBR owners are required to carry their BTAF tax stamp with the firearm at all times

Now let's look at suppressors. In addition to being prohibited in 12 states, silencers also require the same BTAF tax stamp and registration.

• Silencers require a $200 BTAF tax stamp (this involves an application, lengthy background check, consent from local LE and registration).
• Silencers can only be transferred through a Class-III firearms dealer (no direct sale between buyer and seller)
• BTAFE notification is required prior to taking across state lines (ATT)
• Silencer owners are required to carry their BTAF tax stamp at all times

What about full-auto? This is where the real fun begins... Full-auto firearms are highly-regulated by the NFA act.

• Only FA firearms manufactured in or prior to 1986 may be owned by civlians
• Complete M16s will run you $18,000!!! The drop-in auto sears (DIAS) for existing semi-automatic AR15 lowers run $9,000 - $12,000. More details on the drop-in sears, technical aspects and legalities can be found here.
• Full-autos and auto-sears require a $200 BTAF tax stamp (this involves an application, lengthy background check, consent from local LE and registration), 2 sets of fingerprint cards and 2 passport photos)
• The application can take anywhere from 50-90 days to 9 months (even the slightest error results in immediate rejection). In addition to the background check, an extensive FBI criminal check is also run.
• Full-autos can only be transferred through a Class-III firearms dealer (no direct sale between buyer and seller)
• BTAFE notification is required prior to taking across state lines (ATT)
• Full-auto owners are required to carry their BTAF tax stamp at all times

So just to re-cap... provided you're not in one of the 8-12 states that outright prohibits SBRs, suppressors, full-autos and limits magazine capacity - this is what you're looking at to get SBR/full-auto/suppressed setup:

• 3 separate applications, 3 background checks, 3 letters/applications from local LE, 1 extensive FBI background check and fingerprints on file
• 1-2 BTAF tax stamps ($400; $200 for the FA/SBR and $200 for the suppressor, if it's detachable) which are required to be carried with the firearm at all times.
• Upwards of $500 for a suppressor (usually more)
• Anywhere from $9,000-$12,000 for a DIAS (more for an actual FA M16)
• Then you still have your upper, optics and accessories

The bottom line is that even if all of these options were available in Canada, this involves an investment of between $15,000-$20,000... for a single firearm.

Now you shouldn't take this as any endorsement of Canadian firearm laws, because there is certainly room for improvement/overhaul (specifically, ATTs along with transport and storage requirements for restricted firearms).

But it does serve to illustrate that the grass is 'not always necessarily greener' on the other side. And while having the "full-auto" dream in the US is certainly possible, it is prohibitively expensive for the vast majority of firearms owners (the same as it would be in Canada).

Comments/discussion welcome.
 
Last edited:
If I had to get a 200$ tax stamp and lengthy background check for a suppressor and/or 30 round magazine I would not hesitate for one second.

I really have no understanding why people want full auto, it's fun for about an hour but it's not worth the cost of the ammo or the $15,000 dollar price tag at all.
 
So, allowing silencers and getting rid of ATTs would put us quite a bit farther ahead of the US in terms of the cost associated with firearms rights. Silencers are a tricky subject, but removing ATTs is probably in the horizon.

I guess in the US, you gotta pay to play...
 
So, allowing silencers and getting rid of ATTs would put us quite a bit farther ahead of the US in terms of the cost associated with firearms rights. Silencers are a tricky subject, but removing ATTs is probably in the horizon.

I guess in the US, you gotta pay to play...

Don't forget mag limits. I personally would prioritize legalizing regular capacity magazine over everything else. Just my 2 cents.
 
My priority list is hi cap mags, no ATT, supressor, ar hunting and revision of storage laws. I don't care about auto.
 
yup... to get silencers, full auto, SBRS, all the yanks have to do is register, pass a background check and do paper work...

all of which we have to do for all restricted guns... SBR or not, with no option for paying $ to go any further...

didnt always use to be that way of course, but the antis were really at work down there during the late 80's and the 90's


its not an American, or Canadian issue, is what I want people to take from this...

dont be afraid to support orgs like the NRA... and make DAMN sure you donate at least modest sums of money, or even TIME, to the CSSA

remember folks, were all in this together,

normal cap mags is my #1 issue since it makes shooting sports almost impossible... even 10 rounds mags are pretty bad
 
I've never really thought our gun laws were that bad. At least we can still own and operate a wide variety of cool guns unlike some places.

I don't mind registration and ATTs. The mag cap is my biggest beef.
Honestly, I'd be willing to get a separate registration and ATT just for a high cap mag, or silencer, if it meant I could own one.

My gut tells me if we were willing to volunteer to such terms we might just have a chance at getting such things.
 
one thing- that 200 dollar taxwas established back in 34 or something when 200 dollars meant something- a LOT of money- now it's your local chief leo's signature that really carries the weight whether you can go full/silenced/whatever
 
I would gladly jump through any hoop and wait, as well as pay money to have a can on my rifle. Also the Mag limits are a joke. It hurts the shooting sports and criminals have access to all the hi capacity magazines they want with a drill. Oh wait but Iam sure they wouldn't break the law :rolleyes:
 
• Only firearms manufactured in or prior to 1986 may be owned by civlians
• Used AR15 lowers will run you $9,000 - $13,000; a new AR15 lower is $18,000!!!

Can someone explain this to me? How can you get a new AR15 lower if it must be manufactured before 1986? (From what I understand the lower is considered the firearm is it not?)
 
It's all BS, if we have to jump through all the hoops to be allowed to own firearms, there should be NO restrictions. I should be able to own what I want.
So picking and choosing between supressors, or full auto, full cap. mags is useless. Once you start doing that, you give up control and leave them (antis) in charge. Opens the door to more useless regs. and restrictions.
I'll gladly pay a 200 dollar tax to own what I want.

The gun control groups in the states are starting to push hard again and more laws/regulations are the politicians way of trying to keep everyone happy.

Good summary. Was very interesting to see how it does work. Instead of gossip. I knew about the tax, but not the other regulations.
 
So, allowing silencers and getting rid of ATTs would put us quite a bit farther ahead of the US in terms of the cost associated with firearms rights. Silencers are a tricky subject, but removing ATTs is probably in the horizon.

I guess in the US, you gotta pay to play...

Most definitely. 1 in 5 states still prohibit all of the above: no full-auto, no suppressors, no SBR black rifles or SB shotguns and comparable magazine restrictions. So less joy than Canada, and we won't even touch base on firearms ownership in California (even more draconian).

And it's important to remember that the $200 BTAF tax stamp is not the entire cost, because it prevents individual sales. Everything is required to go through a Class-III firearms dealer, and there are no doubt additional fees for this as well. Thus, every time a suppressor or SBR is bought or sold - a $200 fee is incurred - resulting in an extremely poor to non-existant resale market (most would rather buy the latest and greatest since they're essentially "stuck" with it).

As for full-auto, the additional hoops required are on par with having the RCMP run a complete background check and being thoroughly vetted by CSIS as well! Not too mention having your fingerprints permanently on file! I've glossed over some of the more technical aspects; the auto sear is actually the regulated component, and can only be used in a specific registered FA lower.
 
one thing- that 200 dollar taxwas established back in 34 or something when 200 dollars meant something- a LOT of money- now it's your local chief leo's signature that really carries the weight whether you can go full/silenced/whatever

The alternative to the CLEO signature requirement is to form a trust or corporation to which the Title II items are registered.
 
Back
Top Bottom