Creedmoor has had sooooo much hype since SHOT last year. Most manufacturers jumped on the band wagon.
My best opinion as why Creedmoor is superior to the 260.
No real downsides per say to the .260, I just think the 6.5x47L and 6.5 Creedmoor are better. At the end of the day, if you pick .260, it will be a fine cartridge.
I believe that the small primers are superior for primer pocket durability, which both cartridges have in certain brass brands. 6.5 Creedmoor hands down wins in factory support, and much easier to get quality factory ammo for. Big plus for those that don't reload or want the ability to purchase quality ammo off the shelf from time to time. The 6.5x47L is considered the most inherently accurate 6.5mm cartridge out of the three, and is somewhat of a favorite among benchresters in the 6.5mm flavour. One of the easiest 6.5mm cartridge to develop a load for that is accurate and with very low velocity spreads.
The .260 doesn't do anything better than the other two cartridges, IMO. It goes marginally faster, but with the small rifle primers on the other cartridges, you can push the other two to .260 speeds if you wanted to. However, I'm not one to advocate for a couple of extra fps. I'm more about finding a velocity node and getting ES's down. It's not a race after all.
The .260 is not a bad cartridge, I just think that the 6.5x47L and 6.5 Creedmoor can do anything the .260 can do, while doing it better.
The .260 seems to be losing popularity every year, so I must not be the only one that sees advantages in the other two cartridges.
Holy 2005 Batman! Here in the US, you never hear anyone mentioning 260. Its rare to see one at a PRS match. It's dying, everyone knows its dying, no one pushes it here. Any why would they? There are new rifles, ammo and brass coming out for the Creed like mad and you can find rifles chambered in it at any gun shop down here. Pretty much every store has match 6.5 Creed ammo and quite a few even have match 6mm Creed factory ammo on the shelf. And its CHEAP! What do they have in 260? Maybe one type of hunting ammo and the occasional used rifle.
Who cares if the performance is similar? All of the industry support is behind the Creed. It makes ZERO sense to go 260 unless you already have tons of brass for it or an endless supply of free 308 to convert.
Holy 2005 Batman! Here in the US, you never hear anyone mentioning 260. Its rare to see one at a PRS match. It's dying, everyone knows its dying, no one pushes it here. Any why would they?
I got a laugh out of the 2005 comment. I got interested in the .260 when the Savage model 12 LRP was on the cover of "Rifle Shooter" back in 2008 or so. They tested it is the 6.5 cm and I think it was the first time I had heard of the Creedmoor. I knew I could buy Lapua brass in .260 and not creedmoor back then so I went with the .260 That said life got in the way and I had to put most of my long distance shooting on the back burner. Now things have settled down a bit and here I see the Creedmoor is a fan favorite and the roles have reversed. Honestly when I look at the Creedmoor I think "Man that round sure has a cool name, but why did they invent it?" From what I can tell it is almost exactly the .260 rem but with a name out of a Jason bourne movie. blackbriar, treadstone.......... Creedmoor? Just rolls off the tongue better than A-Square or Remington.
So if a guy owns a .260 rem and feels like he should have gone 6.5 creed and then AI's his chamber because deep down he knew .260 rem was the better way to go......... good idea? bad idea?




























