Thinking of using Spitzers in your pre 1903 Mauser ? Think twice!

Nabs

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 99.6%
257   1   1
Location
Somewhere...
This question comes up on this forum and on others I am apart of so I thought I would help settle the issue.

As a courtesy to others and to help share what I have learned about my Gewehr 88/05, Gewehr 98 and Kar98a, I thought I would post these quotes from a favourite book of mine; "German Gew. 88 'Commission' Rifle" by Paul S. Scarlata (You may remember it from another post of mine in a similar thread):

"Adopted by secret directive in April 1903, the new spitzer bullet...had a diameter of 0.323 inches (8.22mm) [and] weighed 154gr."

As for the 198 gr spitzer, a quote from the author (based on the Gewehr 88 but I think it still applies to all late 19th early 20th century German service rifles):

"I feel it is necessary to include a caveat here. While the German army and others apparently felt that firing a Patrone S (154 gr spitzer) in the Infanteriegewehr 88 was perfectly safe, over the years many ballisticians, gunsmiths and others have attempted to dissuade shooters from doing so. The reasons are many but the primary one is that you must look with askance upon the practice of pushing a .323" diameter bullet down a barrel that was designed and bulit for one measuring .318".

...

Then there are the large quantities of surplus 7.9 Patrone sS (198 gr spitzer) ammunition presently available on the surplus market, usually at very attractive prices. This version of the 7.9x57 cartridge was developed late in the Great War for use in machine guns and features a 198-gr. boattail spitzer bullet... , it goes without saying that firing the Patrone sS in 88 type rifles or carbines cannot be discouraged too strongly!"


Be warned and think twice before using Patrone sS in your late 19th, early 20th century Mauser.

The infamous "S" stamp

"Doesn't this mean I can safely fire a 154 or 198 gr spitzer in my rifle ?"

Not necessarily. The "S" stamp means the rifle was rated as being able to accept the new Patrone S round introduced in 1903. The conversion process to "S" involved: reaming out the neck portion of the chamber, the lead being lengthened, and the rear sight being modified.

Because bore diameters may vary by design or by fouling build up, it is always best to clean your rifle's bore as best as you can and slug the bore.

Not sure how to slug your bore ?

Heres a good youtube video on the subject. The only thing I would do differently in the start is use the rod to help push the steel ball or bullet weight down the barrel from the muzzle as you do not want to damage the crown of the rifle (as that will drastically affect your shooting afterwards).

Link.

As some of the bore measurements from my reference book have been noted as not being accurate by a fellow who has slugged and dealt with hundreds of these early barrels, I have posted this information as a guide, It deals with the Gewehr 88.

1888- 1890 .3215" / .314 These are the original rifling specs that were discontinued because the bore wore out too quickly.


1890- ### .3215" / .311 This is the "standard" Gew.88 rifling configuration. Probably 90% of Commission Rifles will fall in this category.


1896-###. 323+" / .311 These are the "Z" marked rifles.
These were the first german rifles to have these specifications.


189x-??? .318" / .311 A small minority of Gew 88 fall into this category.


1920- 30s . 318" / .308 The Czechs made replacement barrels for Gew 88s and are commonly found on 88s from South America. These can be identified by the presence of Czech proofs, and a Z in a circle under the shroud.

I would like to ask this be stickied for future reference.
 
Last edited:
Just to put it in basics - pre 1903 8mm rifles, especially Gew 88's, have a .318 bore whereas post 1903 8mm rifles have .323 bores. Big bullet in small bore = problems.
 
Just to put it in basics - pre 1903 8mm rifles, especially Gew 88's, have a .318 bore whereas post 1903 8mm rifles have .323 bores. Big bullet in small bore = problems.

You are correct. Here are some more quotes from my book that I used to help explain the subject to someone on another forum but they also support what you mentioned:

"The original Infanteriegewehr 88 barrel had a land diameter of .311" (7.9mm) [and] nominal groove diameter of .319" (8.1mm). "

"The following year [1897], the German army purchased 2,000 of the improved Mausers(Gewehr 98s essentially) known as the Infanteriegewehr 88/97, chambered for the standard 7.9mm Patrone 88 , for field trials".

"While production of the Gewehr 98 purposely chambered for the Patrone S (154 gr spitzer) had begun in 1903, all of those produced prior to that were chambered for the Patrone 88 and their barrels had the same land/groove diameters as the Infanteriegewehr 88."
 
eehhh...ummmm...

weren't A LOT of G88s re barreled?....course that doesn't mean it shouldnt be slug-Oed

Some were re-barreled but not all. Re-barreled Gewehr 88s will have a "Z" marking on their receiver indicating that they have had their grooves deepened to .323 and in some cases .324. Many were not touched and have varying bore diameters. My 1890 Erfurt Gewehr 88/05 had the 1905 modifications done to it sometime between 1903 and 1905 but the barrel and receiver match back to 1890 and slugged out to .321". The groove diameter is also stamped on the left side of the rear sight base but keep in mind that the barrel jacket must match the receiver for this to be accurate.

"Rifles produced after July 1896 were fitted with barrels having the deeper rifling (.321-324") and thus do not bear the "Z" marking.".
 
Looking at Gew 88s, remember that when they were first built they had a really thin section over the front half of the chamber. The 'nm" mod put this right; there is near a pound difference in barrel weight. Take the handguard tube off and compare: BIG difference.

In my younger and extremely sillier days, I actually fired RWS AP aircraft ammo through an '88..... still have all my fingers, too. Some idiots have a lotta luck.
 
Looking at Gew 88s, remember that when they were first built they had a really thin section over the front half of the chamber. The 'nm" mod put this right; there is near a pound difference in barrel weight. Take the handguard tube off and compare: BIG difference.

In my younger and extremely sillier days, I actually fired RWS AP aircraft ammo through an '88..... still have all my fingers, too. Some idiots have a lotta luck.

You are correct, Gewehr 88s, Kar 88s, and Gewehr 91s had very thin barrels. This is why you must be very careful with them. Some will have "Z" marking for deepened rifling or a "." (punch mark) on the receiver to indicate a re-enforced barrel. Others may have "nm" or Neumaterial". These barrels were made from a higher quality steel and are marked with "nm" under the make of model mark or on the barrel.

My Gewehr 88/05 has not been modified since 1903-05 and the barrel is still the same one put on at the Erfurt factory in 1890 (and is a thin one at that). Can't be to careful with her and modern ammo.
 
I was informed on another forum that some of the bore measurements noted in my reference book are not accurate. To help stabilize the issue, I have borrowed some bore diameter measurements from another forum and posted them here. They relate to the Gewehr 88.

1888- 1890 .3215" / .314 These are the original rifling specs that were discontinued because the bore wore out too quickly.


1890- ### .3215" / .311 This is the "standard" Gew.88 rifling configuration. Probably 90% of Commission Rifles will fall in this category.


1896-###. 323+" / .311 These are the "Z" marked rifles.
These were the first german rifles to have these specifications.


189x-??? .318" / .311 A small minority of Gew 88 fall into this category.


1920- 30s . 318" / .308 The Czechs made replacement barrels for Gew 88s and are commonly found on 88s from South America. These can be identified by the presence of Czech proofs, and a Z in a circle under the shroud.
 
Very interesting, could you describe your 88/05 or perhaps post some pictures ? I am always interested in these rifles.

It's served in the Turkish army at some point, as the rear sight leaf has been replaced. The receiver ring has the notch for the spitzer rounds cut out of it and the "S" stamped on it. I'll take pictures tonight.
 
It's served in the Turkish army at some point, as the rear sight leaf has been replaced. The receiver ring has the notch for the spitzer rounds cut out of it and the "S" stamped on it. I'll take pictures tonight.

Yep, sounds like a standard Turked 88 alright. That is what my present day 88/05 is as well. She wasn't reworked (receiver blued) in the 1930s and did not go as far as an 88/05/35 aka Turfek 1935. Only her rear sight was modified and a replacement bolt put in.

Looking forward to the pictures.
 
Sorry I got home too late to take photos, but if I have a chance over the weekend I will. The ones I have on my computer are from when I first bought it and hadn't cleaned it up from being in someone's closet for 20 years.

I had an 88/05/35 but sold it to buy my 88/05. The stock looked like a Turk Mauser stock. Had a nice grain to it too but 88/05s are much nicer rifles. Under the Turkish crest I could just make out Leowe Berlin 1889, which is a shame for such an old receiver to end up Turked like that!
 
Also, my Gew. 88/05 is an 1891 Danzig. All my current German rifles are Danzig made, actually. I also have an 1888 Danzig Gew. 71/84 and a 1917 Danzig Gew. 98 (converted to a K98.)
 
Wow, my rifles are extremely similar. As you can see from my signature, most of my rifles are Danzig (some of the same dates as yours as well). My Gewehr 98 1917 Danzig was converted to Kar98b specifications in the 1920s and even had a barrel replacement in 1939. What an interesting piece to have Imperial, Weimar, and Third Reich proof marks all beside each other. I would be very interested in seeing pictures of your collection so I can compare them with mine.
 
I had always assumed the bore stamp on the receiver measured the grooves but I just recently learned that is the measurement of the lands (7,92 = .3118", 7,91 = .3114", and 7,90 = 3.110"). It looks like my Gewehr 98s and Kar98a should have a groove depth of .323 with lands ranging from .3110" to .3118". Being new to the rifling process and exactly what happens in the bore when a round is fired, I found this information very interesting. It also cleared up alot of mis-conceptions I had about the early Gewehr 98s. The Gewehr 88 still presents some issues as far as exactly what the land and groove depth will be as it was changed more than once during the rifle's service life. You can't avoid the bore slugging process for this one.
 
Turns out my 71/84 is a Spandau. Got a shot of my Gew 88's receiver though:

1891.jpg
 
Very interesting. Looks like an "S" certification along with a 1905 modification. The receiver also looks blued which may indicate it was re-finished by the Turks in the 1930s or it is simply tarnishing of the steel alloy used in the manufacturing of the receiver. I have a Gewehr 98 that has a similar receiver that was once bright finished but now it is tarnished.

I also found it interesting how the Danzig crown stamp changes depending on the year and/or make of model. My 1905 Danzig's crown stamp is quite different from my 1917 and both are different from your 1891.

Very interesting indeed.

I can also see what looks like the Danzig fireproof on the right side of the receiver wall, muzzle forward, along with a possible "RC" or Revisions Commission stamp just above it.

Any unit markings ?

Thanks for sharing.
 
Back
Top Bottom