geologist said:What's all the crying about? It's not like it was a Python!![]()
Cocked&Locked said:no, whats the crying about, it's not like it's a smith and wesson![]()
Here's where my education begins: Lacking any sophisticated test instruments, the load I was using felt comparable to any factory ammo I had used in the past. 9.0gr of Titegroup behind a 240gr SJSP. This was 10% below the maximum load as published in the Hogdon manual. It shot with consistent accuracy and was economical because it was the same powder as I had used in the .45. I now realize my quest to economize reloading may well prove to be the source of this misfortune.
Fall Guy said:This one, along with the great photos, should be made a sticky in reloading as a warning to all. At least the owner was very forthcoming. Kudos.
When I load hot, I do everything one at a time. And I wouldn't be progressive loading hot just to blast at paper either.
The range for 240 Grain LSWC is 4.7 and 10.0 grains of Titegroup. A double charge at minimum (for punching paper) would have resulted in a stiff round only.
geologist said:What's all the crying about? It's not like it was a Python!![]()
Round five was somewhat damaged - the bullet was pressed into the case by about one-eight of an inch. A little more and it may have detonated as well.



























