thoughts on ruger 77/44

MiG25

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
69   0   0
Location
B.C.
anybody tried one of these? looks like an interesting rifle.

comments on accuracy, funtioning, etc?
 
My father in law has an old semi auto ruger in 44. Not the same action but the same result. It's a good laugh but not all that accurate. 2" groups @ 100yds.
He loves it for being so light and was even naive enough to pack it out for his cow elk draw that he waited for four years to get. Need I say the elk were there on his last day to hunt but they were out of range for his cabbage tosser. He never got another chance. I told him to pack his 06........... :roll:

What do you want to use it for, hunting or play?
 
for the only reason to have such a big bore..... bear defence!

i think it would be neat to have a "fat .22".
 
That's what Kurt uses it for now. He and the Missus love to hike up to fire towers and such through the summer months and totted it for defense, the perfect 'lil lotta.

We loaded up 300 gr xtp's and 265gr hornady's for it, settled with the 265's as they held up better.

I would try to find one you could try out before buying as I don't know what kind of resale market there is for one should you not be happy with it.
If your up this way sometime I could go grab Kurt's gun and let you yard off a few rounds. 8)
 
Can't load heavy 300 grainers in mine. The rotary mag is too short. 3" @ 100 with most loads. More than accurate for 150 yard range. I find my Win 94 much more accurate and will feed ANYTHING. The 77 is my wifes rifle and she loves it. Easier for her to use than my clumsy tube mag(to her). I also like the fact you can slip a whole mag into the rifle if you see an animal from the vehical.
Best, cheapsk8
 
yeah, i imagine that the rotary mag limits the OAL of the rounds.

my uncle has a win 94 in 44 mag, neat rifle, wouldn't feed new out of the box though.
 
I had one for a while--found it ok with jacketed bullets but not up to snuff with cast--oal and feeding issues, accuracy issues. Was light and handy though.

44Bore
 
44Bore said:
I had one for a while--found it ok with jacketed bullets but not up to snuff with cast--oal and feeding issues, accuracy issues. Was light and handy though.

44Bore

Had a Ruger 77/44 for awhile. Seemed like too much rifle for that ctg. If you're using the .44 Rem Mag in a rifle better in a lever/carbine I think.
 
ruger 44

I don't have a 77, but I do have the lever 96-44. I find 2-3 inch groups as close to perfection as a guy can shoot. I've read a few american forums where guys have improved accuracy by replacing the factory barrel. I am actually looking for a custom barrel maker to turn out such a product. I mounted a Tasco shotgun scope on it this fall for mulie season. I used in the opening week when the deer were still 'curious' and not too spooked. My mule buck was 100 +/- 5 yds, and with jacketed 180 grn., the bullet entered the lungs/heart and bounced around, not even exiting the other side! The small buck walked about 5 yds and collapsed. The analogy of a fat .22 is about right. It's a great light gun for packing. I look forward to using it next summer knocking a few pesky beavers off their dams.:p
 
Back
Top Bottom