- Location
- Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Which is better for shooting 1000 meters for comps? and hunting? your thoughts people......this will be my first rifle.....thanks.....
Tikka T3 Tactical .308 Win V.S Rem 700p .308
- Thread starter mad_machinist
- Start date
Steve David
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Oshawa, Ontario
I have shot both several times, and owned a few 700P's, never a Tikka, but I would take the Tikka anytime over the 700P.
I have a 700p and my brother the tikka tac. Both are used for hunting and competition guns.
I know it gets said alot but, It really is a matter of personal preference.
Between the two I prefer my 700p.
The biggest thing I don't like about the Tikka is the stock. It feels plasticy compared to the remmy and I can't get used to the adjustable cheek piece, especially in a snap shooting hunting situation.
I think muzzle brakes, which I don't think is required on a .308 anyway, are obnoxious especially when standing beside it. Also becomes a bit of a snag fest / dirt collector when going through the bush. I know, you could use it without, but then why would you get it if you aren't going to use it. There are better paperweights in the world.
I've found aftermarket parts unavailable and pricey - extra mag was over $100.
Of course, If you asked my brother, these would all be things he would count as positives in the Tikka's favour.
I will give it credit for a much smoother action and drop magazine (excluding cost of mags).
Performance wise, there won't be much of a difference IMO. So snuggle them both up and pick the one that feels best.
I know it gets said alot but, It really is a matter of personal preference.
Between the two I prefer my 700p.
The biggest thing I don't like about the Tikka is the stock. It feels plasticy compared to the remmy and I can't get used to the adjustable cheek piece, especially in a snap shooting hunting situation.
I think muzzle brakes, which I don't think is required on a .308 anyway, are obnoxious especially when standing beside it. Also becomes a bit of a snag fest / dirt collector when going through the bush. I know, you could use it without, but then why would you get it if you aren't going to use it. There are better paperweights in the world.
I've found aftermarket parts unavailable and pricey - extra mag was over $100.
Of course, If you asked my brother, these would all be things he would count as positives in the Tikka's favour.
I will give it credit for a much smoother action and drop magazine (excluding cost of mags).
Performance wise, there won't be much of a difference IMO. So snuggle them both up and pick the one that feels best.
I forgot to add that, and Xs2 I had to do a bit of fiddling with the 700 to equal the tikka. Or should say Tikka..sss
Some do some do not, I have had some 700s that were tack drivers out of the box as well.
One thing I've noticed is how everyone on forums praises the accuracy of the Tikka. Yet, on every review site the Remingtons show a tendency for .5 moa out of the box, and the Tikka's are generally just over .5 moa.
The only Tikka I'm interested in is the Master Sporter in .308. I like the TRG style wood stock. I hate the plastic/polymer stock.
The only Tikka I'm interested in is the Master Sporter in .308. I like the TRG style wood stock. I hate the plastic/polymer stock.
- Location
- Vancouver Island BC
Tactical this and tactical that....I have an old Remington 600 in .308 that will shoot as good or better than any Tikka I've owned.
If you want cheap overpriced plastic stocks with mags that restrict overall length, then buy a Tikka.
If you want accuracy and lots of after market goodies, buy Remington.
If you want cheap overpriced plastic stocks with mags that restrict overall length, then buy a Tikka.
If you want accuracy and lots of after market goodies, buy Remington.
- Location
- Scarborough, ON
If you want an action - buy a Remington.
If you want a rifle - buy a Tikka.
Being the Sako guy I am It pains me to say I like this rifle. I've knocked 700's for years. My tune has changed a bit now.
What caliber?
