Trial delay means poachers get off Scot-Free.

ElkMasterC

Regular
EE Expired
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Well.....this ####es me off. Clearly poachers, with kids, showing the kids how to steal from everyone.
Now they might walk because of trial delays, and teach the kids another lesson. Nicely done to all involved, poachers AND our Court system

____________________ ____________________ ____________________ ____________________ _______________


Deer used as shooting gallery, court told

Defence seeks to have charges dropped because of three-year delay

bilde




September 30, 2013

By Cam Fortems
Daily News Staff Reporters

The Crown alleges Lower Mainland men on a hunting trip in the South Cariboo used a herd of deer as target practice, leaving the dead animals in the middle of a field.
A prosecutor also charged Monday in B.C. Supreme Court that a deer was shot by a teenage son of one the hunters, under his watch.
One of the deer killed was a doe, standing with a fawn.
But the defence is seeking to have the charges thrown out based on a nearly three-year delay in the case coming to trial.
Paramjit Singh Chahal, his 23-year-old son Sukhraj Singh Chahal, and Sukhvinder Singh Kalkat are together charged with 16 counts under the Wildlife Act and Firearm Act.
The Crown alleges three mule deer were shot on Nov. 12, 2010, at OK Ranch, in the South Cariboo about 50 kilometres west of Clinton.

Defence lawyer Mark Rowan argued charges should be stayed, saying an unreasonable delay in a trial is a breach of the three men's rights under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Provincial court judge Stephen Harrison is set to rule on the application Tuesday.
Prosecutor Joel Gold outlined Crown allegations that the three hunters, along with two children aged 12 or 13, drove up and down High Bar Road in a pickup.
They stopped the truck several times, getting out to shoot and kill three deer standing among a large group browsing on the hill.
Only one of the three had a limited-entry tag to take an antlerless mule deer during that season. Gold said a deer fitting that class was taken, gutted at roadside and taken back to a hunting camp.
But conservation officers saw two more deer shot and left where they fell. One of them was shot by Kalkat's 13-year-old son, who had no hunting licence, the Crown alleges.
"Why they shoot them is speculative," Gold said. "There's a lot of deer on the hill. Perhaps they're practicing."
Conservation officers had been tipped off, Gold said. One of them secretly watched the truck using binoculars while another looked through a high-power scope at the deer that were felled.
"Leaving kills in the field is bad example-setting and mentoring of these two young hunters," Gold said. "It's very serious conduct in hunting ethics."
All three men are charged with carrying a loaded firearm, discharging a firearm across a highway, shooting in a no-shooting area, hunting wildlife out of season and failure to retrieve wildlife. Kalkat is additionally charged with hunting with a person under 19 who has no licence.
While still unproven, the charges nonetheless resulted in Kalkat, an insurance agent, being turned around at the U.S. border. He is also seeking to become president of a Rotary chapter, but the charges remain hanging over that bid.
Sukhraj Chahal, who Rowan said is seeking a career in policing or corrections, was unable to apply while the charges hung over him.
"It's the sheer length of this delay," said Rowan, noting mule deer are not endangered and adding the charges "aren't on the serious end of the Wildlife Act."
The delay was caused in part by impending heart surgery of one of the conservation officers, which resulted in an adjournment of 10 months in the first scheduled trial.
Rowan said much of the time his clients suffered while under the charges is a result of "institutional delay" — lack of court time. That delay could harm the defence case, which relies on memory, he said.
"There was a failure to prioritize. . . . I don't blame anyone in administration. It may simply be an inability to prioritize."


Link here: http://www.kamloopsnews.ca/article/2...ery-court-told
 
Last edited:
They are Not Hunters, they are Poachers..the thieves walk amongst us.
I hope it costs them thousands of $$$$ and public embarrassment ...
Three years to come to trial , because one of them probably left the country for a 8 month vacation back to the
mother land and then having to reschedule the court date is what likely happened and is not being reported
as of yet...
Hmm, fine upstanding citizens who want to apply for a career in policing and another who wants to volunteer in Rotary
while yet another was denied entry into the United States because he has a charge against him??
I love the Lawyers comment suggesting the Laws that where being broken where not serious ...
Seriously, shooting over a highway in a ''No Shooting'' area or leaving wildlife to rot ? Not to mention they knew this after presumably having passed the BC CORE ?
Hmm, I wonder how that would go over at a Rotary Convention ??
Sure glad they are not in my neighbor hood.
Tight Groups,
Rob



ps, I have no knowledge if the accused caused the delay...just an assumption/accusation.
It is plausible after all.
 
Last edited:
They're vandals, nothing more.

I do think a person has a right to a speedy trial.... this case was delayed by the accused, so no wash in this situation. imo.
 
Unfortunate and not trivial , but a lot more serious charges have been lost the same way. Justice has definitely swung too far to favor the Accused. Thought the Harper government was going to address the problem and what exactly is an unreasonable wait for a trial ? Different judge might have another opinion, sounds like grounds for an appeal.

Grizz
 
ive beat HTA charges with that same line.
:)

btw, poachers illegally harvest.
these guys didnt harvest ####, they were just out there killin
 
I have an acquaintance that hit a taxi while driving with more beer than he should've. Got charged with DUI. Went to court, got thrown out because of delays. (He knew he was guilty all day long).

Court appearance was on a Friday, so Friday night he goes out to the bar to celebrate...but smarter this time and calls a cab. Guess who shows up at the door to take him to the bar? That's right, the very same cab driver he saw in court that day. Cab driver just said something like "Good to see you've learned your lesson" :).

Realistically it looks like 3-4 years since the event, and they still weren't in court. Can you imagine having to live for 3-4 years with charges hanging over your head and no resolution? The crime is heinous, but by the same token, nobody should have to live for that long with that hanging over their head. It doesn't mitigate what they've done, but the delay alone is a pretty severe punishment in itself - which is why I think this stuff gets thrown out. We don't want federal employees being able to harass us extensively simply by letting court cases linger on - that's a very bad tactic, one that shouldn't go unpunished either.
 
Back
Top Bottom