Understanding Fill Rates

bearhunter

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Uber Super GunNutz
Rating - 100%
178   0   0
Location
okanogan

Understanding Fill Rate in Ammunition Reloading: Why It Matters and How to Manage It​

Writer: MaxMax
Mar 93 min read

Updated: 5 days ago

Summary: This blog post explores the concept of fill rate in ammunition reloading, its importance, and the reasons why maintaining a fill rate between 80% and 100% is desirable. We discuss the potential dangers of press loads, the risks associated with low fill rates such as in subsonic loads, and how these risks can be mitigated using filler materials. Additionally, we examine how the positioning of powder within the cartridge can impact ballistic performance, referencing research by Reload Swiss.





Powder positioning in cartridge

Powder positioning in cartridge







What is Fill Rate in Ammunition Reloading?


Fill rate refers to the volume of the cartridge case that is occupied by the powder charge. A high fill rate means the powder nearly fills the case, while a low fill rate leaves significant empty space. Achieving the correct fill rate is essential for both safety and performance, making it a fundamental consideration in the reloading process. Also, see more information about the fill rate definition here.





Why Fill Rate Matters


A consistent fill rate is crucial for reliable ballistic performance. Powder burns more uniformly when it is compacted within the cartridge, leading to predictable pressure curves, velocities, and accuracy. Poor fill rates can result in inconsistent ignition, velocity deviations, and potential safety hazards.





The Ideal Fill Rate: 80% to 100%


A fill rate between 80% and 100% is often recommended because:

  • It promotes consistent ignition and burn rates.
  • Reduces the risk of powder shifting within the case during handling or firing.
  • Minimizes pressure fluctuations that can occur with partial loads.

This range ensures that there is enough powder to generate the required pressure without leaving excessive empty space that could cause erratic performance.



What Are Pressloads and Why Are They Bad?


Pressloads occur when powder is excessively compressed within the case, leading to:

  • Irregular ignition due to excessive compaction.
  • Inconsistent velocities and poor shot-to-shot accuracy.
  • Potentially dangerous pressure spikes that can damage the firearm or injure the shooter.

Maintaining a fill rate within the recommended range helps avoid press loads and ensures safe, reliable performance. It is essential to carefully measure powder charges and avoid over-compression during the reloading process.



However: There are often exceptions from the general rule. Sometimes a slight pressload can achieve the best accuracy and velocity. It depends on the caliber, powder, and gun. This is why testing various loads for a specific gun is so important. An example of a very well-working press load is i.e.: 6.5 Creedmore, Hornady brass, .264 | 143gr | Hornady ELD-X, 42.5gr | 2.75g ReloadSwiss RS 62, COL: 2.80" | 71.1mm.





Risks of Low Fill Rates


Low fill rates, such as those used in subsonic loads, can lead to several issues:

  • Inconsistent powder burn due to uneven distribution within the case.
  • Dangerous pressure variations can affect accuracy and safety.
  • Increased risk of detonation (rapid, unintended combustion) which can cause severe damage.

Subsonic loads often require lower powder charges, making fill rates challenging to manage. Understanding these risks is essential for reloaders working with specialize. Filler materials, like cotton or foam wads, can be used to:

  • Keep powder positioned near the primer for consistent ignition.
  • Ensure uniform burn rates by preventing powder migration within the case.
  • Reduce pressure variations and improve shot-to-shot consistency.

Proper selection and placement of fillers can make low-fill cartridges safer and more reliable, especially when working with subsonic ammunition.





Powder Positioning and Its Impact on Ballistics


The position of powder within a cartridge can also significantly affect ballistic performance. Needless to say, this is more relevant for low-fill rate situations. Research by Reload Swiss has shown that pressure differences can occur depending on how the powder is distributed inside the case. Powder resting against the primer (see above image 1) ignites differently than powder settled at the front of the case (see above image 2) , leading to variations in pressure and velocity.

Here is an example of how the positioning of the powder influences muzzle velocity and pressure (.308 Winchester, RS14 10.5 gr, Fill rate 74%, Lapua Brass, Lapua Subsonic B416 200 gr, S&B LR primer, C.O.L.: 66.6 mm):



Position of the Powder
1 -on Primer 2 - Horizontal3 - at the bullet
Velocitym/s / fps315 / 1033320 / 1050325 / 1066
Pressurebar / psi1651 / 239461924 / 279051996 / 28950



To ensure consistent ballistic performance, reloaders should:

  • Use filler materials when necessary.
  • Handle cartridges carefully to prevent powder shifting.
  • Experiment with different powders and charges to find the most stable combinations.



Conclusion: Maintaining an optimal fill rate is essential for safe and accurate ammunition reloading. By understanding the importance of fill rate, avoiding press loads, mitigating risks associated with low fill rates, and considering powder positioning, reloaders can achieve more reliable and precise results. Reloading is both an art and a science, and careful attention to fill rate ensures that every shot is consistent, accurate, and safe.
 
I've started packing my light reloads with toilet paper. 1/2 sheet of Kirkland tp in a .308 case loaded with 10 gr. 700X, for example.
 
Partial truths. There's nothing scientific about this article - no testing, just a cobbling together of reloading "knowledge".

None of this applies to the use of fast pistol powders. Handgun and rifle loads have employed very fast powders using fill rates well below 50% for decades - without fillers.
 
For the new person, a person who hasn't heard of it before, the information about the potential for detonation is very important.

We take it for granted, but it's because we've been warned.
 
For the new person, a person who hasn't heard of it before, the information about the potential for detonation is very important.

We take it for granted, but it's because we've been warned.
Good warning, but principally that applies if you use the same powder that you would usually fill the case with.
Let's say you usually fill with Varget, at 50% fill you should be using something more like IMR4198.
At 25%, it should be a pistol powder.
I'm painting with a very broad brush, so take it with a fistful of salt...
 
For the new person, a person who hasn't heard of it before, the information about the potential for detonation is very important.

We take it for granted, but it's because we've been warned.
Firstly, even though it has proven impossible to replicate, I am in the camp that believes that detonation is a real phenomenom. Detonation manifests itself in hangfires, and in some reported cases damaged firearms.

That said, it's a somewhat vague special case of the use of "slower" smokeless powders with a "fill rate" somewhere below published minimum loads. As to how slow a powder, certainly slower than H4895, which is commonly used for reduced loads with fill rates as low as 60% of Max Load. Hodgdon warns against using other rifle powders in this way.
 
Last edited:
Such a practice also serves to protect against an inadvertant double charge.

So... even if it costs more... it might be worth it.
 
The article above was sent to me by XXRELOAD.

I don't believe it's main intention was to warn against a possible Kaboom from squib loads, but added as a "caution"

From what I could see, the article was mostly to show how powder capacities can and do effect accuracy, under different conditions.

Squib Kabooms don't happen often. No one is saying they do. Conditions for it happening are documented in "scientific" articles.

As for the article not pertaining to pistol cartridges, I agree, but that's like comparing Grapefruit to Grapes.
 
Back
Top Bottom