Unissued 1943 Savage No.4 (pics)

Claven2

CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
406   0   2
Location
Onterrible
I posted this example on my usual site (MSC) a while back, but in the end, I figured there are many here who don't go there that might be interested in seeing pics of what unissued Savage No.4's look like. I took fresh (better) pics today and am posting them here for your viewing pleasure.

This was part of a batch that turned up here 20-25 years ago, still in the cardboard shipping boxes. Sadly, when I got this from an estate a couple months ago, the boxes were already tossed out :(

The rifle still had the original light application of factory cosmolene on just the metal when it came to me. The bore was heavily greased and the rifle was un-fired since leaving the factory (still unfired by me). All I've done was degrease the rifle, add a sling, and I very carefully cleaned off a few areas where surface rust was just starting to appear on the areas that didn't have grease on them. She still looks new except for bluing loss on the buttplate screws from being displayed in a rack for many years.

Many (most?) of the Savages you encounter today have had other finishes applied, are heavily oxidized, have been to India, etc. to the point you don;t often get to see how they left the factory. Factory fresh LB's are BY FAR more common up here.

So without further ado, here is a parkerized unissued 1943 Savage No.4MkI* looking like a GI would have first seen it during the war. Mk2 flip sight, stamped-construction front sight protector, slab-side cocking piece. Every par,t wood too, is S-stamped. Magazine (S marked) hand-numbered to the rifle. EDIT: To the fellow who PM'd me - yes, the barrel is 2-groove. Virtually all 1943 production should have been2-groove when it left the factory.

If a rifle you encounter doesn't look like this, then it's been monkeyed-with somewhere along the line ;)

Here is a photo taken in bright sunlight through a window, no flash. It makes the stock color look a little washed-out.



Here is the same shot with a camera flash:



The color in-hand is somewhere between the two. There is definitely a reddish-orange tone to the wood. I don't know if this is a factory-applied pigment, or a function of the original RLO dip tanks being contaminated with wood tannin from seeing thousands of stocks, or if it's the oxidizing effect of RLO aging for 70+ years. No way to know today. But an untouched rifle should look like this one TODAY. The interior wood surfaces ARE oil treated, but would not see much oxygen and are much lighter natural-birch coloured. Yes, the wood is all yellow birch.

Here is the other side.



Notice the oil-blacked safety spring. It looked just like this when the grease was wiped off, imperfections from rattling around the parts bin and all. The patchy finish is a by-product of the oil blacking process wearing off from factory handling, it isn't very robust. Most you see are worn down to plum bluing. By 1943 the factory was using a smaller ordnance bomb stamp. On this rifle, it was applied crookedly and only the "flame" is showing, the round part of the bomb not having indented the steel.



Nice clean park-lubrite. Same finish you see on M1911A1's from the same period.



Bolt handles are hand stamped, the Letter-digit in a larger font than the numerals. This is how the factory did it. The receiver serial was machine-applied, the bolt serial was hand-stamped. The C is larger on every example I have come across than I can verify is original.



Hand-stamped Savage magazine. Done in a different font than the rest of the rifle, mags were added and numbered to rifles at a much later stem in the manufacturing process in a different part of the factory.



Hope that was helpful to some folks :) Now I need to decide what to do with the rifle, display it, shoot it, or sell it to finance the next treasure hunt - lol.

Ain't collecting a great hobby?
 
Last edited:
Well done you! What a beautiful piece of history and if it were mine, I'd have a very hard time parting with it. My brother just picked up an essentially unfired Ross M10 issued to the County of York Home Guard with a proper representative era bayonet for under a grand! I've had some good deals over the years, but I envy you.
 
A "G.I." is an American Army soldier. They always referred to British Army soldiers as "Tommies" and I've heard the expression "Johnnie Canuck" (there was a comic book by that name), but I'm not sure there was a regular nickname for them.
 
These were delivered to allies ALL over the world, including India, European resistance groups, even the Russians. This particular rifle probably didn't leave the US during the war at all. FWIW.

There are no import/export markings and no commercial proof marks. IMO it never went to England. More likely than not, when these first turned up, they were probably found in a CF depot having been shipped from Canadian Arsenals. When Savage closed the No.4 production line, they sent everything to Longbranch, including machine tools, gauges, spare parts, and any completed rifles that had not been shipped to Ordnance at that time.
 
I remember when those rifles were available, over 40 years ago. A friend has one still in the packaging and grease.
 
I remember when those rifles were available, over 40 years ago. A friend has one still in the packaging and grease.

Was it that long ago? I still used to see them semi-regularly at gunshows in the late 1980's/ early 1990's. I haven't seen one trade hands publicly in many years though.
 
Yes, it was when my kids were still small. My son turned 48 this past week.
The rifles were packed in individual cardboard boxes, with the bolt in a separate little cardboard box with the serial number written on it.
I have no idea where the rifles came from.
 
Yes, it was when my kids were still small. My son turned 48 this past week.
The rifles were packed in individual cardboard boxes, with the bolt in a separate little cardboard box with the serial number written on it.

I've seen the boxes before. This one still had it's boxes when the last owner cared for it. His family threw them in the trash, thinking them unimportant. Sad really. At least the rifle was still as-new. I degreased it as I saw no point in keeping it greased without the cartons. Plus I wanted to photograph it properly.
 
I have wondered too if Savage stained the wood. It sure looks like it, but why?

I have never seen the cardboard boxes myself, the wrapped rifles I have come across did not have them. I assumed they would have been stored in crates.

As to being monkeyed with, I would imagine the rifles could have been shifted around many times after leaving the factory, some suffering damage along the way, so that could explain why some un-issued rifles have parts from other factories not marked Savage.

Again from what I have read, the various factories got parts from all over, so some rifles could have mis-matched wood and other bits as they left the factory.
 
To those looking, keep in mind not all savage stocks were yellow birch. If I were to garner a guess, yellow birch would be an oddball wood, as they used this heavily in aircraft manufacture in ww2. Being relatively uncommon in the forest it would mostly be allocated for that use. Beech was and is very common and was used by savage to make stocks. The odd coloring of this stock may have been the tannins from the many beech stocks they have dipped in the BLO combined with the yellowing of Linseed over time.

Nice example. Thanks for sharing!
 
To those looking, keep in mind not all savage stocks were yellow birch. If I were to garner a guess, yellow birch would be an oddball wood, as they used this heavily in aircraft manufacture in ww2. Being relatively uncommon in the forest it would mostly be allocated for that use. Beech was and is very common and was used by savage to make stocks. The odd coloring of this stock may have been the tannins from the many beech stocks they have dipped in the BLO combined with the yellowing of Linseed over time.

Nice example. Thanks for sharing!

I would challenge you to present photos of beech furniture marked with the Savage . I think you will NEVER find such a piece of wood.

Beech is/was VERY uncommon in Massachusetts where the factory was located. I discussed this with Ian Skennerton at one point and all he said was "Charles Stratton's books contain errors". He was right - those books are often wrong.

EVERY beech stock on a Savage I have ever seen was marked "F" for fazakerley and was an in-service FR or FTR replacement.

The only non-birch woodwork marked Savage I have ever seen were a few walnut rear hand guards. And I've seen more Savage furniture than most over the years. I would believe otherwise if photos surface of Savage S-marked wood of other types. Savage woodwork is usually marked with an S inside a square, or a stylized squared-off S.
 
Last edited:
I have wondered too if Savage stained the wood. It sure looks like it, but why?

I have never seen the cardboard boxes myself, the wrapped rifles I have come across did not have them. I assumed they would have been stored in crates.

As to being monkeyed with, I would imagine the rifles could have been shifted around many times after leaving the factory, some suffering damage along the way, so that could explain why some un-issued rifles have parts from other factories not marked Savage.

Again from what I have read, the various factories got parts from all over, so some rifles could have mis-matched wood and other bits as they left the factory.

In the MSC thread, someone posted pics of the original carton boxes, but from another similar rifle. They aren't my photos, so I'm not free to re-post them here. Ive seen a few original boxes from this batch myself, but not in many years. Savage is the only maker I know of that packed the rifles in cardboard and then packed the cartons into crates. The US did this with other rifle types as well - I suspect is was simply cheeper than building better crates.

As to mix and match parts, from the brit factories, yes. Not Savage. There is no record of Savage ever getting parts from anywhere but Savage. LB, on the other hand, used a LOT of Savage parts on 1944 rifle production for a brief period after Savage ceased manufacture and their spare parts became available. By 1945, all the LB parts were made in-house again.

If you see variances to this, it's generally accepted the parts were changed in service. The unissued rifles out there are the only real "proof" most advanced collectors would accept to the contrary - such proof has yet to surface.
 
Drool!!! Exceptional rifle and a good write up to go along with it. I have what appears to be an unissued, non-serialed British No.4 at home. I can't provide any more details, as I am away at the moment.
 
Yeah, it's not likely I will see another for sale anytime soon ;) I may still sell it though - I basically bought it to document it for MSC, which is completed. I did't get any deal on it either - I paid full fare ;)
 
My Father-in-Law bought one of those rifles way back in the late fifties. I saw it last summer at the cabin. He bought it before my wife was born, to keep at the property since it was so wild up there, with a box of cartridges and never once fired it. It hung on the wall next to the canoe paddles, I've seen photos of it in the album and I asked about it ten years ago or so and got no positive reply.
Anyway last summer I had to repair some animal damage in the attic and there it was in the rafters, wrapped and sealed in vapour barrier and duct tape, sleeping away the whole C-68 fiasco.
The cartridges are still there with it. I'll just let it sleep some more and maybe "find" it again after the old boy makes his exit.
 
I have wondered too if Savage stained the wood. It sure looks like it, but why?

I have never seen the cardboard boxes myself, the wrapped rifles I have come across did not have them. I assumed they would have been stored in crates.

As to being monkeyed with, I would imagine the rifles could have been shifted around many times after leaving the factory, some suffering damage along the way, so that could explain why some un-issued rifles have parts from other factories not marked Savage.

Again from what I have read, the various factories got parts from all over, so some rifles could have mis-matched wood and other bits as they left the factory.

it is not unlikley that late longbranch rifles left the factory with savage parts, also, it was war time and they had no consideration for collectors 70 years away, so it wouldnt surprise me to find early parts on a late rifle, imagine the last box or 2 of one style gets put on the shelf to await assembly and gets shoved to the back by the next several boxes of new style parts. one day that box makes its way to the assembly line and the foreman says to put them on, hes got numbers to meet.

also, it wouldnt surprise me if a factory made excess of a particular part, it would send them to the next factory that needed them.
 
For those who might be interested, I listed it in the EE. Whether it sells or not, hopefully this thread has helped a few people out wrt seeing a proper example :)
 
Back
Top Bottom