Updated.......Windage scope bases?

[kamlooky]

Weaver makes a windage adjustable ring set labeled "Grand Slam".
Item # 49318 and I used the Matte tint.
A few photos per yer viewing.
These are a lot nicer than the Mullet style and don't wish fer eye bleach.
A few bucks more than the yuckie ones, but worth the investment over the
cost of Burris Z's with inserts.
'Bout arff the cost......................

[URL=http://s614.photobucket.com/user/kamlooky/media/VZ24%20257impr/DSC00393_zpsesyzkpm4.jpg.html][/URL]

[URL=http://s614.photobucket.com/user/kamlooky/media/VZ24%20257impr/DSC00397_zps3dnk90mb.jpg.html][/URL]

[URL=http://s614.photobucket.com/user/kamlooky/media/VZ24%20257impr/DSC00398_zpsxjvz5k2r.jpg.html][/URL]





Need to get the rear over a bit and on the receiver are
Weaver #45 on the rear and #46 on the front.
What are any options for rear adjustable bases?

 

[RobertMcC]

Need to get the rear over a bit and on the receiver are
Weaver #45 on the rear and #46 on the front.
What are any options for rear adjustable bases?

Leupold. Have to buy both front/rear set because front pivots. Avoid mangle lock rings.

 

[tiriaq]

You might be able to get away with Burris Signature Zee rings, using the eccentric inserts to shift the scope laterally.

 

[Lszwajda]

Or you can try millet angle-lock rings

 

[RobertMcC]

Or you can try millet angle-lock rings

Theyre junk. nick named mangle locks

 

[Lszwajda]

Leupold. Have to buy both front/rear set because front pivots. Avoid mangle lock rings.

Lol. I see what you did there

 

[kamlooky]

You might be able to get away with Burris Signature Zee rings, using the eccentric inserts to shift the scope laterally.

Might be enough.
Screws are dang tight, maybe loctited in.
Forgot about these insertable rings.

Thanks for the ideas.........

 

[RobertMcC]

Lol. I see what you did there

I only ever had 1 set and trying to get them setup you curse them, also puts too much strain on the tube and need almost like a laser precision scope line up tool.

Leupold rings/bases are nice because its loosen, tighten, no strain on the scope.

 

[cosmic]

I've used the Millet rings in the past without issues - if you have a bit of mechanical aptitude you should be fine.

 

[hunter5425]

I've used these htt p://www.weaveroptics.com/rings_bases/rings/detachable_top_mount/default.aspx on a rifle that was drilled a bit off and they worked , though they wee not a nice to use as Leupold rings.

 

[silverfoxdj]

You might be able to get away with Burris Signature Zee rings, using the eccentric inserts to shift the scope laterally.

I've used these and it worked well for me..

 

[Rod B]

I've used the Millet rings in the past without issues - if you have a bit of mechanical aptitude you should be fine.

I have only one set of these. They are ok if you take the time to adjust both front & rear equally. That said I much prefer the Burris Signature rings.

 

[Quiet]

I've used the millet rings on a number of rifles. I count the clicks on the scope to centre the reticle for windage and then boresight on a plumb line to adjust the millet bases for windage. The important thing is to leave the ring caps extremely loose when doing this. Then I lap the rings with a broomstick and emery cloth to make sure it is straight before putting the scope back in and tightening the caps.

The problem I've encountered with the millets is that the heads of the screws break off when they've been installed and re-installed a couple of times. I've had 3 screws break so far. Had to shoot the nationals one year with my scope held into place with a plastic tie down strap because of that.