Used bcl102 received today

Status
Not open for further replies.
S

Stephano

Member
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Location
Northern Muskokas
I received a FDE BCL102 today that I ordered Dec 12. I opened the receiver of the rifle to give it once over and upon inspection I found there to be a lot of gas and powder residue in the receiver of the rifle, and the BCG was had external wear marks, sloppy rings, and dirty. I ran a patch down the barrel and it came out sooty black, not oily. Looking over the exterior of the rifle i could where a scope had been mounted (clamp marks) on the rail.

I am quite sure I ordered a new BCL102. I will have to call SFRC in the morning as this is unacceptable.
 
They are all test fired from the factory in a proving chamber and random ones are fired for accuracy. It’s all part of the QC checks everyone keeps asking about.

Ryan


Stephano said:
I received a FDE BCL102 today that I ordered Dec 12. I opened the receiver of the rifle to give it once over and upon inspection I found there to be a lot of gas and powder residue in the receiver of the rifle, and the BCG was had external wear marks, sloppy rings, and dirty. I ran a patch down the barrel and it came out sooty black, not oily. Looking over the exterior of the rifle i could where a scope had been mounted (clamp marks) on the rail.

I am quite sure I ordered a new BCL102. I will have to call SFRC in the morning as this is unacceptable.
Click to expand...
 
I’m locking this. It was test fired and tested for accuracy, nothing more. Stephano, I replied to your pm.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom