Lee Enfield said:"Fulton Armoury" & "Smith Enterprises" consider Norinco mags to be USGI equivilent.
Coming from "Fulton's" thats really saying something.
From a 5 round point of view, besides fit and finish...they both work....
Winters said:I know a yank that said the Marstar mags hold only a tight 18 rounds when 're-built'...
Of no consequence to us Canucks at this stage of the game though. My Marstar 5/5 and 5/20 round mags work 100%, although 2 of the 20's are really tight to get the 5th round in - they could have drilled the hole an 1/8" lower.
Morpheus32 said:If you have drilled holes, they are not marstar....all that I have seen have modified followers rather than rivets....
Jeff
Rusty Shackleford said:I got both my 5/20's from Marstar and they both have rivets.
Morpheus32 said:Are these recent mags? All that I have seen have the extended follower not a rivet....
Jeff
Hungry said:I've competed with both the USGI(all through the 80's and 90's) and Norinco M14 (2001 - 2005) magazines with great success.
Not a single hangup or hesitation from either maker. I was very happy with my Norinco M14 mags with the large fin welded on the bottom of the follower.
No need to rush out and spend all your hard earned money on USGI mags. Save your money. Well, then again, if you don't have a mortgage and kids to send to University, by all means go out and buy USGI magazines! Honestly, Norc mags from Marstar do it for me.
Nope, Johnone from Marstar ain't paying me for this plug. I just don't like watching all of you spend your money into this direction. Buy lots of practice ammo and enter my Service Rifle matches. THAT will increase your shooting skills.
Cheers,
Barney
Morpheus32 said:That is interesting as the last bunch that I have seen...basically over the last two years have been with the modified follower...
Jeff
I believe that a lot of Norinco M-14 mags are being sold in the US as USGI.