It is my understanding that the "book" is telling you what primer they used, what brand of brass, how much powder, how deep they seated which particular bullet - and then tell you what they got for velocity in their barrel, with their chamber. As per Post #2, if you change any part of that recipe, is not really much reason why you would get the exact same results? In Nosler's case, they even report the grains weight of water they got within that case with that bullet seated to that depth.
I am not so sure that I go for the idea there is "faster" or "slower" barrel - but I do know there is cleaner, or more fouled; rougher or smoother; larger or smaller diameter; different groove and rifling widths and depths; longer or shorter barrels. In some cases, is even left hand twist versus right hand twist - not sure that affects velocity, but is another difference - one to the other. Chambers vary slightly in dimension, and is alleged that even the fit of the brass to that chamber can affect muzzle velocity.
For example - just the chamber length - SAAMI sets a Min and Max length - is apparently desirable for precision and target guys to want near or at perfect Minimum - even though a chamber up to .003" (or in some cases .009") longer will still be within SAAMI standards - which is what factories probably follow - they will (or should) pound out stuff between Min and Max lengths - not all the same. Apparently not what you pay for, to have a "precision" chamber done.
Perhaps leads to an over-reliance on gauges, measurements and numbers - I think you want your brass to fit snuggly - not .001" too long, or .001" too short. Is fussy to do - perhaps why SAAMI publishes a "range" of acceptable dimensions - until you measure and confirm, do not know what you have - but is most likely somewhere between Min and Max. Not likely we are set up to alter the chamber, so can get similar effect in how we re-size our brass - I think.