It's lucky that I haven't yet received my RPAL, because the waiting period has given me the opportunity to explore all of what are to me a myriad new firearm possiblities.
I intend to purchase only two long guns -- the new 10/22 breakdown version and something else which until just recently I thought was going to be either a mini 14 or an M305. Well, unfortunately for me, chocolate and vanilla aren't the only two firearms flavors. I've discovered there may be other flavors that are just as good, maybe even better.
I had almost decided on acquiring an M305, but the following video entitled "The Top 10: Combat rifles", really through a wrench in the works:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KvrG4T2K4sE
As you can see, the M305/M14 is number 10 on that video's list and AK47 is number 1.
I lived in the States through the Vietnam war era as a gun-loving young adult, so I remember much of what was claimed about the M14, M15(was it the 16 at that time, or was it even an AR15?) and AK47 that appears in that video. Basically, I remember from that time that the M14 and its ammo were too heavy to be lugged around the jungles and a real efffort had to be made to keep them clean, but they could shoot through just about anything; the M15 was too prone to a variety of failures and its bullets could be diverted by just about anything and their penetration was nowhere near as good as the 7.62; the AK47 was really king of the hill primarily for its reliability, even in terrible environmental conditions, and it still delivered 7.62 firepower.
On the scale of aesthetics, however, everything is precisely the opposite, IMO. In short, the AK47 is, as Arnold said when he saw Predator's face for the first time, "one ugly motherf..ker"! To me it's actually repulsive.
Anyway, after watching that video and having it remove some memory cobwebs from my brain, I was more than interested in the AK47, but, after further investigation, I have learned that the AK47 and all of its so-called "variants" are prohibited in Canada. However, there's this rifle called a VZ-58L that's at least somewhat similar to the AK and, according to the following video, every bit as reliable:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIRN_XKMyhI&feature=relmfu
The same man also has a video in which he breaks down both firearms:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TexeQ0QPFU&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PLF2F5B7D4D0B84429
Again, in it he claims that the (19)58 is every bit as reliable as the (19)47.
After having watched the disassembly of the 58 just one time, I believe that if I were handed one right now, I could disassmble and reassemble it with no problem. I can not say that about the M305, even though I have seen a video of it being disassembled a couple of times. In short, it looks like a dream to clean and maintain and it's not the least bit, shall we say, finicky or "high maintenance".
I don't really know enough about the SKS M4 to say anything about it other than that I like the way it looks!
I have to say right off the bat that I'm not a hunter, nor am I concerned about precise accuracy at great distance. I don't care if a firearm is 0.75" MOA or 3" MOA at 100 meters.
Most of all, I care about reliability of fire (hence my choice of username), but I definitely want a semi-auto long gun, rather than the ultimate reliability of say a bolt-action. I want lots of reliable shots and I want them fast.
I must also admit that I'm concerned about the price and availability of surplus 7.62x51 ammo versus 7.62x39, the latter of which seems both plentiful and very inexpensive.
So I'm writing this to get some comments from owners of these firearms -- particularly from owners who own more than one of them.
From owners of the 58L I'd particularly like to know about its reliability and, if it is very reliable, did this help you accept how it looks? I mean, once again with feeling, I find that firearm ugly! (But some of the most beautiful cars are the most unreliable PsOS and, after you've been robbed by them a few times at the dealership, they get ugly really quick. I'm hoping an butt-ugly, cheap to shoot, ultra-reliable firearm can have the oppostite effect.)
Anyway, please educate me! I'm not "invested" in any way, shape or form in any make or model of firearm, so please feel free to fire at will (poor Will). If you've had the time to plow through this post to this point, I'm sure you've got what it takes to reply to it.
I intend to purchase only two long guns -- the new 10/22 breakdown version and something else which until just recently I thought was going to be either a mini 14 or an M305. Well, unfortunately for me, chocolate and vanilla aren't the only two firearms flavors. I've discovered there may be other flavors that are just as good, maybe even better.
I had almost decided on acquiring an M305, but the following video entitled "The Top 10: Combat rifles", really through a wrench in the works:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KvrG4T2K4sE
As you can see, the M305/M14 is number 10 on that video's list and AK47 is number 1.
I lived in the States through the Vietnam war era as a gun-loving young adult, so I remember much of what was claimed about the M14, M15(was it the 16 at that time, or was it even an AR15?) and AK47 that appears in that video. Basically, I remember from that time that the M14 and its ammo were too heavy to be lugged around the jungles and a real efffort had to be made to keep them clean, but they could shoot through just about anything; the M15 was too prone to a variety of failures and its bullets could be diverted by just about anything and their penetration was nowhere near as good as the 7.62; the AK47 was really king of the hill primarily for its reliability, even in terrible environmental conditions, and it still delivered 7.62 firepower.
On the scale of aesthetics, however, everything is precisely the opposite, IMO. In short, the AK47 is, as Arnold said when he saw Predator's face for the first time, "one ugly motherf..ker"! To me it's actually repulsive.
Anyway, after watching that video and having it remove some memory cobwebs from my brain, I was more than interested in the AK47, but, after further investigation, I have learned that the AK47 and all of its so-called "variants" are prohibited in Canada. However, there's this rifle called a VZ-58L that's at least somewhat similar to the AK and, according to the following video, every bit as reliable:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WIRN_XKMyhI&feature=relmfu
The same man also has a video in which he breaks down both firearms:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TexeQ0QPFU&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PLF2F5B7D4D0B84429
Again, in it he claims that the (19)58 is every bit as reliable as the (19)47.
After having watched the disassembly of the 58 just one time, I believe that if I were handed one right now, I could disassmble and reassemble it with no problem. I can not say that about the M305, even though I have seen a video of it being disassembled a couple of times. In short, it looks like a dream to clean and maintain and it's not the least bit, shall we say, finicky or "high maintenance".
I don't really know enough about the SKS M4 to say anything about it other than that I like the way it looks!
I have to say right off the bat that I'm not a hunter, nor am I concerned about precise accuracy at great distance. I don't care if a firearm is 0.75" MOA or 3" MOA at 100 meters.
Most of all, I care about reliability of fire (hence my choice of username), but I definitely want a semi-auto long gun, rather than the ultimate reliability of say a bolt-action. I want lots of reliable shots and I want them fast.
I must also admit that I'm concerned about the price and availability of surplus 7.62x51 ammo versus 7.62x39, the latter of which seems both plentiful and very inexpensive.
So I'm writing this to get some comments from owners of these firearms -- particularly from owners who own more than one of them.
From owners of the 58L I'd particularly like to know about its reliability and, if it is very reliable, did this help you accept how it looks? I mean, once again with feeling, I find that firearm ugly! (But some of the most beautiful cars are the most unreliable PsOS and, after you've been robbed by them a few times at the dealership, they get ugly really quick. I'm hoping an butt-ugly, cheap to shoot, ultra-reliable firearm can have the oppostite effect.)
Anyway, please educate me! I'm not "invested" in any way, shape or form in any make or model of firearm, so please feel free to fire at will (poor Will). If you've had the time to plow through this post to this point, I'm sure you've got what it takes to reply to it.


















































