What would you build?

BlackRam

CGN frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
142   0   1
Location
Northeastern BC
I have a new Montana 1999 LH SS short action with magnum bolt face that I picked up for a project (338Win Mag). Originally told that it was a long action with a magnum bolt face.
Have since decided against the project, in favour of a Sako 85 LH Hunter. (You know how that goes! LOL)
Have had this up for sale for a year at a reasonable price ($400 under cost) with no interest.
Have been thinking that if I build a rifle, it may sell easier...or may just keep it. Nothing fancy.

Been thinking of either the 6.5 PRC, 270 WSM or the 338 RCM. 6.5 PRC is first choice, and the 338 RCM second. (I already have a 6.5x55 and a 6.5 Creedmoor, and a 338 Federal and a 338-06)

Which would you build?
 
First, fix the bolt handle.

Second, you never make money on resale by doing custom work... unless you are doing it all yourself.

Third, with two 6.5's and two .338's, why not change it up for this project? Split the difference with a .30 cal or go to a .375 cal of your choosing... you should be able to make a .375 Ruger work with some bolt work.
 
Problem is the short action magnum its not the action if it was a standard bolt face it would have sold long ago . A Winchester 70 lh wsm is a hard sale on its own but if its a 3006 it will sell $300 more and quick lefties are mostly buying common calibers as a rule . Iam a lefty and have seen your action listed I think a 25 wsm would be kool but it would have to be a keeper cause you would never be able to sell it so a PRC 6.5 .
 
Those of us in our "right minds" shoot left handed rifles! LOL
I realize that I cannot recoup monies on a custom build, but if I can source a cheap barrel and stock (looking for take-offs to use and can do some of the work with a friend) it shouldn't cost me a lot to put a rifle together. Can make a decent budget rifle for someone.
I already have a 300 WSM (and a 30-30, 307 Win and 30-06) so am covered in the 30 cals. Have thought about it for resale, but not seeing alot of 300 WSM's selling right now, with more interest in the PRC's and most have returned to the Win Mag. Too bad, because I like the WSM better and believe that most shoot it better than the Win Mag (less powder = less recoil) The 6.5 PRC is also on my radar, and would be a step up in performance in my battery and would not be a bad thing to keep!
I also have a 376 Steyr, so no need for a 375 Ruger.
Would like to keep it as a non-wildcat for resale considerations so the 25 and 35 WSM's are out (the Sambar is a cool cartridge, but not on my radar at this time). I do like the 25 cals, but in stepping up from my 250 Savages and 250AI, I would opt for a 25-06 to pair with my 280, 30-06 and 338-06.
The 338 RCM is a neat cartridge, and also on my radar, so if I do end up keeping it, it won't be a terrible thing either!
The 7mm WSM is a great cartridge too, but I am covered with a 7mm-08, a 284 Win, a 280 Rem and a 7mm STW. So that made it easier to consider the 6.5 PRC.
I have owned all of the 270 factory cartridges but the 6.8 SPC over the years, and while I prefer the Wby, the WSM is a great cartridge, and I do not have any other 277 cal rifle at the moment, so it would also fit. And as it seems to be the most popular WSM, believe it may be the easiest to sell.
 
I'd sell it for what it took to make it go away. Better/easier to sell and take your loss now than down the road after you get a custom rifle you may not want.
 
Those of us in our "right minds" shoot left handed rifles! LOL
I realize that I cannot recoup monies on a custom build, but if I can source a cheap barrel and stock (looking for take-offs to use and can do some of the work with a friend) it shouldn't cost me a lot to put a rifle together. Can make a decent budget rifle for someone.
I already have a 300 WSM (and a 30-30, 307 Win and 30-06) so am covered in the 30 cals. Have thought about it for resale, but not seeing alot of 300 WSM's selling right now, with more interest in the PRC's and most have returned to the Win Mag. Too bad, because I like the WSM better and believe that most shoot it better than the Win Mag (less powder = less recoil) The 6.5 PRC is also on my radar, and would be a step up in performance in my battery and would not be a bad thing to keep!
I also have a 376 Steyr, so no need for a 375 Ruger.
Would like to keep it as a non-wildcat for resale considerations so the 25 and 35 WSM's are out (the Sambar is a cool cartridge, but not on my radar at this time). I do like the 25 cals, but in stepping up from my 250 Savages and 250AI, I would opt for a 25-06 to pair with my 280, 30-06 and 338-06.
The 338 RCM is a neat cartridge, and also on my radar, so if I do end up keeping it, it won't be a terrible thing either!
The 7mm WSM is a great cartridge too, but I am covered with a 7mm-08, a 284 Win, a 280 Rem and a 7mm STW. So that made it easier to consider the 6.5 PRC.
I have owned all of the 270 factory cartridges but the 6.8 SPC over the years, and while I prefer the Wby, the WSM is a great cartridge, and I do not have any other 277 cal rifle at the moment, so it would also fit. And as it seems to be the most popular WSM, believe it may be the easiest to sell.

It appears you left a little out of your opening post...

My best suggestion is to take pictures of the rifle upside down and sell it that way...
 
That'd be the most sensible course of action for sure.

Yeah, he should mention what he's selling the bare action for, and then we'd understand why it hasn't been sold, instead of saying $400 less than cost. When you can buy a nice new similar and complete rifle for the same price, why just buy an action.


Also, why use a long action for a short chambering build.. It seems the whole point of compact magnums is to save weight with a short action.

I'd go 358 norma or 338WM with that action if I were doing a build with it.
 
Look into Sherman wildcats. From your list it looks like you could use a 6SST, 7SS or SST or a 25SST. Depending what the gun will be used for will depend which caliber. For an all around deer gun and able to stretch it out I may go 25SST with a fast twist to shoot the 131 Blackjack. I am in the process of building a 6SST and a 7SST switch barrel gun. With ADG brass available for the Sherman Shorts it makes the choice to build a wildcat much easier. Little to no brass prep on a wildcat is a plus in my book. All the Sherman shorts will run in a true short action where the SAUM and WSM need the bullet seated deeper to fit in the mag.
 
Yeah, he should mention what he's selling the bare action for, and then we'd understand why it hasn't been sold, instead of saying $400 less than cost. When you can buy a nice new similar and complete rifle for the same price, why just buy an action.


Also, why use a long action for a short chambering build.. It seems the whole point of compact magnums is to save weight with a short action.

I'd go 358 norma or 338WM with that action if I were doing a build with it.

Yessir, I've looked at the ad a few times over the last few months. As much as I like M70 type actions, it's a hard pill to swallow.

OP says he ordered a Mag LA, but received a Mag SA. I thought I'd missed something, but that is why all the suggestions for SA chamberings.
 
Why do you keep thinking this is funny or in any way helpful?

Great question to the original poster of the question...
No worries...at least for me....but others may be more sensitive to these type of remarks, so remember, if you are teasing those you know, make sure other know it! (RESPECT!)

I have dealt with this type of reply and attitude for almost 30 years since i got my first left handed rifle, so my typical response to day is referring to us lefty's as being in our "right minds", as right handed people are left brained and lefty are right brained. I am actually right handed and left eyed dominant, so in order to become the most proficient that I can be with a weapon, rifle or bow, I shoot left handed.
I guess this means that I use both sides of my brain! LOL

Most lefty's are taught to shoot with right handed firearms, as only 10% of the population is left handed and only 10% of those individuals shoot. That means that only 1% of the firearms manufactured are left handed. They do not consider that nearly 30% of the population is left eye dominant. In my experience with setting up and teaching new archers how to use their equipment, it hhas been my experience that 27% of my customers have been left eye dominant, and of those, most are female and of aboriginal descent.
It does cost manufacturers more money to retool their production lines to be able to make left handed, so many have neither done this or have opted to discontinue the practice.
I do see a number of manufacturers starting to make firearms specifically for youth and women (our fastest growing segment of this challenged industry), yet most are not offering these in left hand configurations. Savage and Remington seem to be the main ones to do so.

Put a left handed firearm into the hands of a right handed, right eye dominant person and ask them to use it, and most will give you that blank stare of a monkey trying to solve a trigonometry problem. Yet they do not stop to think what it is like for the lefty to have to deal withthis same issue most of the time. They really cannot relate to the issue.
Not trying to belittle these people in any way, but to open their perspectives. I do not think many stop to think about the issue, so are unaware.It takes a little awareness training to do so. Most respond well to this when made aware.
I laearned to shoot right handed on right handed rifles, as that is how my grandpa taught us, as he was taught in the US Navy. I still practice right handed with my firearms, as you never know when something may happen, such as an eye injury, and you may need to shoot from your weak side. (some pistol sports require shooting from the weak side, such as IDPA, but I have not seen them make you shoot from your non-dominant eye). Get a stick in the eye when following up a wounded bear; what are you going to do? Food for thought.
 
Back
Top Bottom