Which is better- Ruger Mark 3 or Browning Buck

[target]

I presently own a Taurus Tracker 22 LR revolver and like it well enough. I would like to get a 22 LR semi auto, but am limited to either a Ruger Mark III target 5.5" or a Browning Buck Standard 5.5". They both feel good in my hand but without being able to shoot them before I buy them I cannot decide if the Ruger's $60.00 extra cost is worth it. It looks like a better gun, but that does not always reflect it's target performance. The Browning's chamber is visible regardless of which side you lay it down with the action open. The Ruger has the loaded chamber indicator and a left side chamber opening.

 

[Varmit]

I started a similar topic a couple of days ago, have a look, got some good replies from the guys, thanks a lot. I think I will go with the ruger.

 

[South]

I started a similar topic a couple of days ago, have a look, got some good replies from the guys, thanks a lot. I think I will go with the ruger.

Do you have a link? Or subject title?

 

[NAA]

Ruger MkIII

Probably, just boils down to personal preference. I prefer the Ruger...

 

[ontgunner]

I've got the Ruger and two Brownings (Camper & Splash).
Wouldn't sell any of them (Ruger is a tad more accurate, the Splash is the nicest to shoot).

 

[target]

Wow! I started this thread in Feb. of '06!

Since then I sold the Tracker and got a Buckmark URX back in March of '06.

The Buckmark's a keeper.