Winchester 1886 New Production 45/70 Loads

aakoksal

CGN frequent flyer
Rating - 100%
66   0   1
Location
YYC, Alberta
Good days,

I was wondering if anybody reloading for this rifle. Any issues sending 325gr jacketed projectiles with 2150fps?

Just purchased one of these, and never reloaded 45/70 before, there is data out there for 45/70 Lever Guns, but I'm thinking those are older guns... The Manual of the gun says the gun is designed to shoot modern factory cartridges only...

Thanks in advance...
 
The online Hodgdon Reloading Data Center lists data for all three sets of .45-70 load ranges. May help answer your question. Your gun will certainly also fire low pressure loads, intended for Springfield trapdoor rifles. Otherwise, stick to load data in the 1886 range.
 
There's a guy on Youtube who owns a 1886 modern rifle that he had converted to 50-110 , he also has one o 45-70. He reload them to max capacity and gets more than that safely. The 1886 was the base for the 71 winchester that digest higer pressure loads. As always start with a normal load and up from there and watch for hi pressure signs. If you want to watch his channel go to " lever 50-110 "
 
The online Hodgdon Reloading Data Center lists data for all three sets of .45-70 load ranges. May help answer your question. Your gun will certainly also fire low pressure loads, intended for Springfield trapdoor rifles. Otherwise, stick to load data in the 1886 range.


Stick to Alex's suggestion religiously.

The ballistics of the load you suggest must be getting very close to .458 win mag pressures. You are right to assume your "new rifle" must be stronger than the old turn of the century rifle...to a point it will be...of course stronger modern alloyed metal , but still the 1886 engineering design...this means the barrel wont blow up with published manual handloaded ammo but with handloaded hot rodded ammo ( as your suggestion seems to be to me) MAY cause breakage to other less robust pieces/parts of the action.

Another point I will make that you don't seem to know is that "modern 4570" ammo is loaded to be within the weakest pressure points of even older collector rifles for the simple fact that some of that ammo will be used in those older guns ( Springfield trapdoors the most obvious in this case).

In one sentence, "modern ammo" doesn't mean "hot-rodded" in any instande for the 45-70.
 
Thanks, everyone. Manual clearly says the gun is designed to handle SAAMI pressures, so I'll just go with the Hodgdon reloading data. Reloaded 5 rounds of 4 groups, starting 50 grains all the way up to 53. The last two groups ended up being compressed, we'll see how things go. I'll report back if I still have my fingers attached... :)
 
Haha, right on, already looking for one of those; trying to decide if I should look for a Quigley’s Sharps in 45/110 or stick to 45/70... Decisions, decisions...

If you ever decide to buy a .45-110 be sure to get a supply of brass before you get the rifle. It can be very hard to find at times. Back when I bought mine it was pretty easy to get Norma 2.88 .45 Basic brass. Now I know of people who've waited months to get some.

With respect to that Miroku built 1886, it won't hurt to shoot SAMMI spec loads ( reloading to SAMMI spec for the .45-70 is generally a bit hotter than the factory 405gr ammo anyway. The factory 405gr stuff is pretty light to prevent some poor fellow from blowing up his trapdoor. ) I suspect that the new Miroku built 1886's are probably at least as strong as a new Marlin 1895, but I don't load Marlins to 40,000 psi either :).

When it comes to the Hodgdon data, I usually don't go past starting loads on them with .45-70 lever guns. You'll find that Hodgdon's starting loads for .45-70 lever guns are sometimes hotter than Hornady's max loads for instance. When reloading the .45-70 you want to be pretty careful as there is a fair bit of unsafe data around. The cartridge won't show pressure signs until it's way past safe.

Chris.
 
My Hornady 8th edition book lists loads up to 2,150 fps with their FTX bullet in a 22" barrel.

Their loads seem to be conservative, for one powder and 300 grain jacketed bullets they top out at 48 grains. Hodgdon's data for the same powder has a starting load at 53 grains and a max of 57!

Hornady: 22" barrel max 2,100fps
Hodgdon: 24" barrel max 2.400 fps

Pretty dramatic difference, but I'm not sure why. There's no way they get that much of a pressure difference between different jacketed bullets.
 
Haha, right on, already looking for one of those; trying to decide if I should look for a Quigley’s Sharps in 45/110 or stick to 45/70... Decisions, decisions...

aakoksal and guntaker have mentioned the BIGGIE as far as I'm concerned: BRASS availability.

I went with the .45-70s after trying to find brass for other rifles I could have bought at pretty good prices.
There was a reason,for the discounted prices of course; with no brass they were wall hangers.
I stocked up on a lot of .45-70 brass when it was available to me as I found these single shot buffalo guns breed, but they did like different powders, loads and bullet weights to wring out their best accuracy. (Well as best as I can shoot) (OK, not very well).
It goes without saying that a testing time of different bullet weights, charges and powder types is in your future, but it's all fun.
Please let us know how you make out and stay safe.
 

Attachments

  • THG W Sharps 26_zps56efb28a.jpg
    THG W Sharps 26_zps56efb28a.jpg
    92.1 KB · Views: 69
Thanks, everyone. Manual clearly says the gun is designed to handle SAAMI pressures, so I'll just go with the Hodgdon reloading data. Reloaded 5 rounds of 4 groups, starting 50 grains all the way up to 53. The last two groups ended up being compressed, we'll see how things go. I'll report back if I still have my fingers attached... :)

SAAMI pressure limit for the 45-70 is 28,000 CUP. That is the limit your owner's manual is referencing.

The loads shown in various reloading manuals for the Ruger #1 and the new production 1885 High-walls clock in at about 40,000 CUP.

For comparison the SAAMI limits for the old 30-06 are 50,000 CUP.
 
There's a guy on Youtube who owns a 1886 modern rifle that he had converted to 50-110 , he also has one o 45-70. He reload them to max capacity and gets more than that safely. The 1886 was the base for the 71 winchester that digest higer pressure loads. As always start with a normal load and up from there and watch for hi pressure signs. If you want to watch his channel go to " lever 50-110 "

Read the last sentence in gunlakers post #10. With the vast difference in quality of design of rifles chambered in 45-70, the worst advise you can forward to a novice of both the rifles & cartridges 9s to "watch for pressure signs"...pressure signs in modern primers & brass dont become evident until over 50,000...as Chris stated, way to late to look for brass pressure as the pressure signs you will/may see is shrapnel spread all over the place from a 25,000 rifle.
 
I'm seeing people on the interwebs with all their wisdom stating Winchester/Miroku rifles are good up to 50,000psi. Hope I could verify that...

Back to the drawing board, I guess...
 
Why don't you call Hodgdon and ask the question? Their "lever action" load does what you want to do, which was 325 gr @ 2150 fps.

I suspect they'll be familiar with the situation you're in and can offer advice.

The few times I've called them they were great to talk with.
 
I'm seeing people on the interwebs with all their wisdom stating Winchester/Miroku rifles are good up to 50,000psi. Hope I could verify that...

Back to the drawing board, I guess...

I see people on the Internet who claim Elvis is still alive and that Trdeau Jr is the best PM Canada has ever seen.
 
I'm seeing people on the interwebs with all their wisdom stating Winchester/Miroku rifles are good up to 50,000psi. Hope I could verify that...

Back to the drawing board, I guess...

I would never load an 1886 to 50,000 psi. I don't think there are any credible sources publishing data in that range other than for strong single shots. The strongest commercial loads I know of are made by Garrett Cartridges. Their Hammerhead ammo is loaded to something like 35k cup from what I remember. I believe that they state their ammo is ok in newer 1886's.

To give you an idea of some of the dangers I will give you two examples from some time ago. Both happened to me. The .45-70 was the first cartridge I'd reloaded so I was not very experienced when this happened.

1. I was loading using data from the Lyman handbook. I was using their data for Reloder 7 and 405gr cast bullets. I never went up to max loads, always staying a grain or two below max. One day I bought a chronograph and decided to check velocities. At Lyman's starting powder charge I was hitting max velocity but in an 18.5" barreled marlin. I spoke with Alliant to ask why this would be so. They told me that the powder had been changed since they bought out Hercules who made the original Reloder 7. They said what I was seeing is what they'd expect and that Lyman was publishing data using the old powder. Have no idea how fast the heavier loads were going because I disassembled them.

2. At this point I'd been loading .45-70 for a year or so and was still into shooting painful .45-70 loads. One day I decided to try some of Hdogdon's loads in my Marlin. They were not max loads, somewhere in the middle of the range for lever guns using H-4198 and I don't remember the bullet, but probably 400gr Speer. I'm quite meticulous so no errors in powder charge, same oal, primeds, brass, etc. After shooting the loads I deprimed the cases and found that my RCBS Rock Chucker could barely resize the brass. It took huge force on the handle. The resized brass had a ridge in it near the web where the die had reached the end of its travel. The web of the brass had significantly changed diameter. I was really lucky that my rifle didn't disassemble itself. That was published data with brand new brass.

The internet is full of pictures of disassembled rifles, mostly Marlin 1895's in .45-70 that were pushed too hard.

One other thing I found with my chronograph. Case volume is very significant. if you try thicker brass like Federal or Remington with data specifies Winchester brass, you'll have to back off the load significantly.

Nowadays I mostly shoot black powder cartridge rifles, but when I shoot smokeless in my Marlin it's mostly under Sammi pressures, except for the cartridges I keep for grizzly defense. Those are 405gr cast bullets at 1700 fps which can be achieved with reasonable pressures for a modern lever gun.

Chris.
 
Well, got to shoot the rifle today. 50grains of IMR 4198 produced 2185 fps average speed. This is almost the same as the load data provided in Hodgon site, so I presume the pressure they published would be relatively accurate at 37,000 CUP.

The rifle was pleasant to shoot, action cycled and ejected spent case smoothly without any hesitation. I didn't see any high-pressure signs, but I wasn't expecting to see any as others suggested here...

The distance was 100 meters, I was a bit surprised to see that the gun shoots high. Maybe I need to get used to the buckhorn rear sights. I had to take the rear sight all the way down to the first notch, put the front bead all the way to the bottom of the rear sight and I still had to aim 4 or so inches below the point of hit... Wonder if that is a sign that these rounds were a bit fast for what the gun expects to shoot...? Maybe I need a taller front sight...

Thanks again for all the knowledge that you guys shared...
 
Well, got to shoot the rifle today. 50grains of IMR 4198 produced 2185 fps average speed. This is almost the same as the load data provided in Hodgon site, so I presume the pressure they published would be relatively accurate at 37,000 CUP.

The rifle was pleasant to shoot, action cycled and ejected spent case smoothly without any hesitation. I didn't see any high-pressure signs, but I wasn't expecting to see any as others suggested here...
.

That data on the Hodgson site you used was for "Modern Rifles" such as the Ruger #1, Winchester/Browning M1885, and Siamese Mausers not Lever actions. You are also more than 2 grains over the maximum load Hornady lists for their 325 grain bullet.

It may or may not be safe in your rifle but at the end of the day it is your rifle and your eyes
 
Back
Top Bottom